Skip to main content
Log in

Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How might argumentation scholars approach sound? Using the analytics afforded by strategic maneuvering, this essay identifies three unique features of sonic presentational devices: they are immersive, immediate and embodied. Although these features offer arguers presentational resource, they also pose new problems to the reasonable resolution of disagreement: immersion hazards overlap (mask), immediacy risks rate of delivery beyond reflection (velocity), and materiality can coerce listeners (force). To theorize strategic use of sound, I reconstruct and analyze a popular Radiolab segment “The Unconscious Toscanini of the Brain.” I find Radiolab uses three different sonic figures: (1) synchronicity, or the translation of data into sound to foreground temporal relations; (2) musical stings, an auditory invocation of embodied memory and (3) the wave, a sonic strategy to arouse and narrow attention. I conclude that Radiolab’s use of sound is reasonable because it extends the critical discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I selected diegetic/non-diegetic because Radiolab is a podcast. If my paradigm case involved an urban setting, then I would adopt sound object/soundscape. These different terms share the same basic features. Like diegetic sound, sound objects are sounds at the center of a listener’s attention, while soundscapes, like non-diegetic sound, sit at periphery of a listener’s attention.

  2. Some may argue that recording a sound gives it a degree of fixity. While sound can be recorded and replayed, this prompts a qualitatively different mode of interpretation (Chion 2016; Sterne 2003). Capturing sound for study through recording and repetition is like ascertaining the qualities of a train as it speeds by—the observer apprehends broad shapes and themes, but not precise descriptions. Moreover, attempts to alter sounds immediacy, such as slowing it down or speeding it up create entirely different objects. For instance, think of the difference a voice sound when it is slowed down or speed up.

  3. Some research even suggests that distractions, like loud noises, can create the conditions for persuasion (e.g., Buller 1986).

  4. Audio of the podcast to listen along can be found here: http://www.radiolab.org/story/91503-the-unconscious-toscanini-of-the-brain/.

References

  • Abumrad, Jad. 2012. The terrors and occasional virtues of not knowing what you’re doing. Transom Review 8: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abumrad, Jad., and Robert Krulwich 2007. Emergence. Radiolab [Podcast]. http://www.radiolab.org.

  • Augoyard, Jean. F., and Henri Torgue. 2005. Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds. Trans. A. McCartney. Quebec: McGill-Queens University Press.

  • Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Gordon C. 1990. Music, mood, and marketing. Journal of Marketing 54: 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chion, Michael. 1994. Audio-Visual. Trans. C. Gorbamn. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Chion, Michael. 2016. Sound: An Acoulogical Treatise. Trans James. A Steintrager. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Corbin, Alain. 1998 The Village Bells. Trans. Martin Thom. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • DeNora, Tia. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Francis. 2009. Sounding New Media. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Justin. 2014. Yellow rain: Radiolab and the acoustics of strategic maneuvering. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3: 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, FransH, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2001. Managing disagreement: Rhetorical analysis within a dialectical framework. Argumentation and Advocacy 37: 15–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg, Brabara. 2010. Summative: Listeners’ evaluation of radiolab program: Choice. Informal Science. Retrieved from http://informalscience.org/projects/ic-000-000-001-394/Radio_Lab_–_A_New_Approach_to_Science_Storytelling_on_Radio.

  • Fullberg, Paul. 2003. Using sonic branding in the retail environment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 3(2): 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, Ana Maria Ocha. 2014. Aurality: Listening and Knowledge in Nineteenth-Century Colombia. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, Greg. 2010. Sonic Persuasion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, Greg. 2013. The sonorous envelope and political deliberation. Quarterly Journal of Speech 99: 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Steve. 2012. Sonic Warfare: Sound, Affect, and the Ecology of Fear. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groarke, Leo, and S. Dewey. 2003. Are musical arguments possible. In Proceedings of the Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, et al., 419–423. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groarke, Leo. 2014. Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation 29(2): 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guéguen, Nicholas, Céline Jacob, Hélène Le Guellec, Thierry Morineau, and Marcel Lourel. 2008. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: A field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcholism Clinical and Experimental Research 32: 1795–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, Joshua. 2010. On speech and public release. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13: 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, Joshua, Greg Goodale, Markio Hall, and Rosa A. Eberly. 2013. Auscultating again: Rhetoric and sound studies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43(5): 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, Clara. 2015. Sonic branding: A consumer-oriented literature review. Journal of Brand Management 22: 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harold, Christine, and Kevin M. DeLuca. 2005. Behold the corpse: Violent images and the case of Emmett Till. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8(2): 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschkind, Charles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Seth S. 2012. The Universal Sense. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huron, David. 1989. Music in advertising: An analytic paradigm. The Musical Quarterly 73: 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idhe, Don. 2007. Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Daniel. 2003. Sonic Branding: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, Henry W. 1990. Rhetoric as a Wedge: A Reformation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 20: 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellaris, James J., and Robert Kent. 1992. The influence of music on consumers’ temporal perceptions: Does time fly when you’re having fun? Journal of Consumer Psychology 1: 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjedlsen, Jens E. 2015. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29: 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBelle, Brandon. 2010. Acoustic Territories. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. 2005. Norms of presentational force. Argumentation and Advocacy 41: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshal. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall., and Bruce R. Powers. 1989. The Global Village. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, Ronald E. 1982. Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing 46: 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Whan C., and Mark S. Young. 1986. Consumer response to television commercials: The impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research 23: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, Damien. 2014. Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics. State College: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radiolab. (2007). Emergence [Blog post], Retrieved from http://www.radiolab.org/2007/aug/14/.

  • Schafer, R.Murray. 1977. The Soundscape. Merrimac, MA: Destiny Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Jonathan. 2003. The Audible Past. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Jonathan. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, Carl Frank. 2008. Sound branding and corporate voice. In Usability of Speech Dialogue Systems, ed. Thomas Hempel, 147–155. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Eckstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eckstein, J. Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers. Argumentation 31, 663–680 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9416-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9416-4

Keywords

Navigation