Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective as the overarching theoretical underpinning in the context of IJVs, this study investigates (1) how exploitation capability and exploration capability as two critical building blocks of dynamic capabilities are independently and interactively associated with IJVs’ financial and competitive outcomes in an emerging economy, and (2) how the two context variables (IJV autonomy and organizational culture distance of IJV partners) moderate the effect of exploitation capability and exploration capability on IJV performance. Using a sample of 102 IJVs in an emerging economy, this study finds general support for the theoretical model. Results suggest that IJVs in a foreign emerging economy tend to perform better when they possess greater abilities to exploit current resources as well as by dynamically renewing their competitive advantage. Moreover, exploitation capability and exploration capability interact in such a way that they “reinforce” each other. Lastly, the contribution of exploitation capability and exploration capability to IJV performance is stronger when IJVs enjoy greater autonomy and when the organizational culture distance between partners of IJVs is small. Theoretical and managerial contributions are discussed and limitations and future research are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand, J., & Delios, A. 2002. Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arino, A. 1997. Partner selection and trust building in West European-Russian joint ventures: A western perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. 1987. Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 18: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28: 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, R. S., McDevitt, A. S., & McDevitt, I. 2010. On improving the robustness of Asian management theories: Theoretical anchors in the era of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27: 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23: 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. 1997. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18: 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K. 1991. Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. 2004. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S. E. A., Meyer, K. E., & Day, M. 2007. Exploitation and exploration learning and the development of organizational capabilities: A cross-case analysis of the Russian oil industry. Human Relations, 60: 1493–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., & Glaister, K. W. 2007. National and corporate culture differences in international strategic alliances: Perceptions of Chinese partners. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2003. From global to metanational. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, F., & Hau, l. N. 2009. Organizational context and knowledge acquisition in IJVs: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 44(1): 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galan, J. I., Sanchez-Bueno, M. J. 2009. The continuing validity of the strategy-structure nexus: New findings, 1993–2003. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1234–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P., Costa, J. E., & Ricart, I. 1993. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1994. Linking organizational context and management action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7: 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. 1994. What if the academy actually mattered?. Academy of Management Review, 19: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67: 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. 1988 Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange, (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business: 205–226. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, D. N., & Verburg, R. M. 2004. High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14: 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22: 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L., & Griffiths, A. 2005. The Impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, 27: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6: 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. 1997. Competition, cooperation and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22: 110–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. 2002. Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30: 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P., Salk, J., & Lyles, M. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1139–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L., & Veiga, J. F. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32: 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2000. Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35: 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2002a. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science, 13: 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2002b. Product diversification in international joint ventures: Performance implications in an emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2003. Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent-subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2007. From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China. Journal of World Business, 42: 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Park, S. H. 2004. Multiparty cooperation and performance in international equity joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Peng, M. W. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experiences, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 268–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Nyaw, M. K. 2001. A dual parent perspective on control and performance in international joint ventures: Lessons from a developing economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. A., Krogh, G. V., & Aadne, J. H. 2003. Knowledge acquisition and knowledge enablers in international joint ventures and their foreign parents. Management International Review, 43: 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. A., & Salk, J. E. 1996. Knowledge acquisition from foreign partners in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B. 1998. Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9: 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 2003. A scholar’s quest. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12: 205–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2007. Contextualising organizational learning: Lyles and Salk in the context of their research. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newburry, W., & Zeira, Y. 1999. Autonomy and effectiveness of equity international joint ventures (EIJV’s): An analysis based on EIJV’s in Hungary and Britain. Journal of Management Studies, 36: 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Y. S., & Park, Y. R. 2004. A framework of knowledge transfer in cross-border joint ventures: An empirical test of the Korean context. Management International Review, 44: 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. I. 2010. What matters to managerial knowledge acquisition in international joint ventures?: High knowledge acquirers versus low knowledge acquirers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, J., Meier, J., & Woetzel, J. 1995. MNCs in China. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P. 1994. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12: 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C. C., & Park, S. H. 2002. National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23: 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salk, J., & Lyles, M. A. 2007. Gratitude, nostalgia and what now?: Knowledge acquisition and learning a decade later. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. 2001. The Influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29: 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyogg, G., & Kliesch-Eberl, M. 2007. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Toward a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsie, J., Martin, X., & Miller, D. 2009. In with the old, in with the new: Capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1440–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, W., & Song, J. 1997. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioural integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32: 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. 2000. Explaining IJV survival in a transition economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 831–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M. A., & Dhanaraj, C. 2005. The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 213–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S. B., & Fladomoe-Lindquist, K. 2002. Internationalization, globalization and capability-based strategy. California Management Review, 45: 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. 1993. The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K., Nguyen, D. T., & Erramilli, M. K. 2004. Knowledge acquisition and performance of international joint ventures in the transition economy of Vietnam. Journal of International Marketing, 12: 82–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C.1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38: 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. 2003. Guest editor’s introduction: Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 2111–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9: 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Li, J. 2008. Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance. The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34: 925–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P., & Zeng, M. 2004. Strategies for competing in a changed China. Sloan Management Review, 45: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 991–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, A., & Duan, J. 2003. Interpartner fit and its performance implications: A four-case study of U.S.-China joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(4): 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, A., & Gray, B. 2001. Antecedents and effects of parent control in international joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, C., & Ergun, E. 2008. Organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An examination of relative effects of culture traits and the balanced culture hypothesis in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43: 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. F. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, W., Chen, R., Erramilli, M. K., & Nguyen, D. T. 2009. Acquisition of organizational capabilities and competitive advantage of IJVs in transition economies: The case of Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(2): 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, W., & Luo, Y. 2008. Performance implications of capability exploitation and upgrading in international joint ventures. Management International Review, 48: 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuniga-Vicente, J. A., & Vicente-Lorente, J. D. 2006. Strategic moves and organizational survival in turbulent environments: The case of Spanish banks (1983–97). Journal of Management Studies, 43: 485–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger (Rongxin) Chen.

Additional information

Wu Zhan and Roger (Rongxin) Chen made equal contributions to the paper.

The authors thank Senior Editor Klaus Meyer and two anonymous reviewers of APJM for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhan, W., Chen, R. Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities. Asia Pac J Manag 30, 601–632 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9235-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9235-3

Keywords

Navigation