Abstract
Background: Specialized 12-step based groups have emerged to address the needs of persons recovering from both substance abuse and psychiatric illness. Objective: This study investigates the role of social support in mediating the association between mutual aid participation and subsequent substance use for dually diagnosed persons. Method: A cohort of Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR) members in New York City were studied prospectively over a two-year period. Findings: Longer DTR participation during the first year of the study was associated with lower substance use in the second year; that effect was partially explained by the maintenance of high level of social support. Conclusion: These findings speak of the enduring influence of 12-step attendance on reducing substance use, and underline the importance of both 12-step attendance and supportive networks for dually diagnosed persons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcoholic Anonymous. (1990). AA 1989 membership survey. NY Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.
Allen, J. P. (2000). Measuring treatment process variables in alcoholics anonymous. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 227–230.
American Psychiatric Association. (1995). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with substance abuse disorders: Alcohol, Cocaine, Opioids. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(Nov suppl): 1–59.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bogenschutz, M., & Akin, S. (2000). 12-Step participation and attitudes towards 12-step meetings in dual diagnosis patients. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18(4), 31–45.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Denzin, N. (1987). Treating alcoholism: An alcoholics anonymous approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dual Recovery Anonymous (1993). The dual diagnosis recovery book. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Finney, J. W. (1995). Enhancing substance abuse treatment evaluations: Examining mediators and moderator of treatment effects. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7, 135–150.
Fiorentine, R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 93–116.
Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. (2000a). Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: The additive effects of integrated recovery activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(1), 65–74.
Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2000b). Exploring the additive effects of drug misuse treatment and twelve-step involvement: Does 12-step ideology matter? Substance Use and Misuse, 35(3), 367–397.
Fiorentine, R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25(1), 93–116.
Girden, E. R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (pp. 07–084). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gonzalez, G., & Rosenheck, R. (2002). Outcomes and service use among homeless persons with seriously mental illness and substance abuse. Psychiatric Services, 53(4), 437–446.
Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press.
Havassy, B. E., Hall, S. M., & Wasserman, D. A. (1991). Social support relapse: Commonalities among alcoholics, opiate users, and cigarette smokers. Addictive Behavior, 16, 235–246.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 65, 599–610.
Humphreys K., & Noke J. M. (1997). The influence of post-treatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(1), 1–16.
Humphreys, K., Huebsch, P. D., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1999a). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(3), 558–563.
Humphreys, K., Mankowski, E. S., Moos, R. J., & Finney, J. W. (1999b). Do enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse. The Society of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 54–60.
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.
Kaskutas, L. A., Bond, J., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effect of alcoholics anonymous. Addiction, 97(7), 891–900.
Kassel, J. D., & Wagner, E. F. (1993). Processes of change in alcoholics anonymous: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychotherapy, 30(2), 222–234.
Kelly, J. F., Myers, M. G, & Brown, S. A. (2000). Multivariate process model of adolescent 12-Step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(4), 376–389.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
Kessler, R. C. (1995). The national co-morbidity survey: Preliminary results and future directions. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 139–151.
Kingree, J. B. (1995). Understanding gender differences in psychosocial functioning and treatment retention. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 1(1), 77–92.
Kissin, W., & Ginexi, E. M. (2000). The impact of self-help involvement on recovery course. Presented at the 62th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, San Juan, PR.
Kurtz E. (1982). Why A. A. works: The intellectual significance of alcoholics anonymous. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43(1), 38–80.
Kurtz, L., Garvin, C., Hill, E., Pollio, D., McPherson, S., & Powell, T. J. (1995). Involvement in alcoholics anonymous by persons with dual disorders. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 12(4), 1–18.
Laudet, A., Magura, S., Vogel, H., & Knight, E. (2000). Support, mutual aid and recovery from dual diagnosis. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(5), 457–476.
Laudet, A., Magura, S., Vogel, H., & Knight, E. (2003). Participation in 12-Step-based fellowships among dually-diagnosed persons. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 21(2), 19–39.
Laudet, A., Magura, S., Cleland, C., Vogel, H., & Knight, E. (2003). Predictors of retention in dual-focus self-help groups. Community Mental Health Journal, 39(4), 281–297
Longabaugh, R., Wirtz, P. W., Zweben, A., & Stout, R. L. (1998). Network support for drinking: Alcoholics anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction, 93, 1311–1333.
Magura, S., Laudet, A., Mahmood, D., Rosenblum, A., Vogel H., & Knight, E. (2003). The role of self-help processes on achieving abstinence in dual recovery. Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 399–413.
Mankowski, E., Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. (2001). Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in 12-step self-help groups after substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(4), 537–563.
Margolis, R., Kilpatrick, A., & Mooney, B. (2000). A retrospective look at long-term adolescent recover: Clinicians talk to researchers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32(1), 117–125.
McCrady, B., & Miller, W. (1993). Research on alcoholics anonymous: Opportunities and alternatives. New Brunswick, NJ: Alcohol Research Documentation, Rutgers–The State University of New Jersey.
McIntire, D. (2000). How well does AA work? An analysis of published AA surveys (1968–1996) and related analyses/comments. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18(4), 1–18.
McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzger, D. et al. (1992). The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 19–21.
Minkoff, K., & Drake, R. E. (1991). (Eds.), Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance use disorder. new directions for mental health services (Vol. 50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Moos, R., Finney, J., Ouimette, P. C., & Suchinsky, R. (1999). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: I. Treatment orientation, amount of care, and 1-year outcomes. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(3), 529–536.
Morgenstern, J., & McCrady, B. S. (1993). Cognitive processes and change in disease-model treatment. In B. McCrady. & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Research on alcoholics anonymous, opportunities and alternatives (pp. 153–166).
Morgenstern, J., Labouvie, E., McCray, B. S., Kahler, C. W., & Frey, R. M. (1997). Affiliation with alcoholics anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 768–777.
Nealon-Woods Ferrari, J. R., & Jason, L. A. (1995). Twelve -step program use among Oxford House residents: spirituality or social support in sobriety? Journal of Substance Abuse, 7(3), 311–318.
Noordsy, D., Schwab, B., Fox, L., & Drake, R. (1996). The role of self-help programs in the rehabilitation process of persons with severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Community Mental Health Journal, 32(1), 71–81.
Pristach, C., & Smith, C. (1999). Attitudes towards alcoholics anonymous by dually diagnosed patients. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 18(3), 69–76.
Project MATCH Research Group (1997). Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH post-treatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.
Ribisl, K. M. (1997). Role of Social Networks in Predicting Substance Abuse Treatment Outcome in A Dual Diagnosis Sample. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco.
Richter, S. S, Brown, S. A., & Mott, M. (1991). The impact of social support and self-esteem on adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Journal of Substance Abuse, 3, 317–85.
Rudy, D. (1986). Becoming alcoholic: Alcoholics anonymous and the reality of alcoholism. Southern Illinois University Press)
Snow, M. G., Prochaska, J. C., & Rossi, J. S. (1994). Process of change in alcoholics anonymous: Maintenance factors in long-term sobriety. Journal of Studies Alcohol, 55, 362–371.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sobel, M. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology(pp. 159–186). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Timko, C., Finney, J. W., Moos, R. H., Moos, B. S., & Steinbaum, D. P. (1993). The process of treatment selection among previously untreated help-seeking problem drinkers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 5(3), 203–20.
Timko, C., Moos, R. H., Finney, J. W., & Lesar, M. D. (2000). Long-term outcomes of alcohol use disorders: Comparing untreated individuals with those in alcoholics anonymous and formal treatment. Journal of Studies Alcohol, 61, 529–540.
Trumbetta, S. L., Mueser, K. T., Quimby, E., Bebout, R., & Teague, G. B. (1999). Social networks and clinical outcomes of dually diagnosed homeless persons. Behavior Therapy, 30(3), 407–430.
Vogel, H. S., Knight, E., Laudet, A. B., & Magura, S. (1998). Double trouble in recovery: Self-help for the dually diagnosed. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 21(4), 356–364.
Weisner, C., Greenfield, T., & Room, R. (1995). Trends in the treatment of alcohol problem: in the U.S. general population. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 55–60.
Zaslav, P. (1993). The role of self-help groups in the treatment of the dual diagnosis patient. In Solomon, J., Zimber, S. & Sholler, E. Dual diagnosis (pp. 105–126). NY: Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laudet, A.B., Cleland, C.M., Magura, S. et al. Social Support Mediates the Effects of Dual-Focus Mutual Aid Groups on Abstinence from Substance Use. Am J Community Pschol 34, 175–185 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7413-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7413-5