Abstract
The recent empirical works have pointed out that the realized skewness, which is the sample skewness of intraday high-frequency returns of a financial asset, serves as forecasting future returns in the cross section. Theoretically, the realized skewness is interpreted as the sample skewness of returns of a discretely observed semimartingale in a fixed interval. The aim of this paper is to investigate the asymptotic property of the realized skewness in such a framework. We also develop an estimation theory for the limiting characteristic of the realized skewness in a situation where measurement errors are present and sampling times are stochastic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Neuberger (2012) uses the term realized skewness for a different concept.
Recall that, for a locally square-integrable martingale M such that \(M_0=0\), \(\langle M\rangle \) denotes the predictable quadratic variation of M, i.e., the predictable increasing process such that \(M^2-\langle M\rangle \) is a local martingale (such a process always exists and is unique; see e.g., Theorem 4.2 from Chapter I of Jacod and Shiryaev (2003).
References
Aït-Sahalia, Y., Jacod, J. (2014). High-frequency financial econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Amaya, D., Christoffersen, P., Jacobs, K., Vasquez, A. (2015). Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of equity returns? Journal of Financial Economics, 118, 135–167.
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Meddahi, N. (2005). Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities. Econometrica, 73, 279–296.
Bakshi, G., Kapadia, N., Madan, D. (2003). Stock return characteristics, skew laws, and the differential pricing of individual equity options. Review of Financial Studies, 16, 101–143.
Bandi, F. M., Russell, J. R. (2006). Separating microstructure noise from volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 655–692.
Bibinger, M., Vetter, M. (2015). Estimating the quadratic covariation of an asynchronously observed semimartingale with jumps. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 67, 707–743.
Billingsley, P. (1999). Convergence of probability measures (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Friend, I., Westerfield, R. (1980). Co-skewness and capital asset pricing. The Journal of Finance, 35, 897–913.
Fukasawa, M. (2010). Realized volatility with stochastic sampling. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 120, 829–852.
Harvey, C. R., Siddique, A. (1999). Autoregressive conditional skewness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34, 465–487.
Harvey, C. R., Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. The Journal of Finance, 55, 1263–1295.
Jacod, J. (2008). Asymptotic properties of realized power variations and related functionals of semimartingales. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 118, 517–559.
Jacod, J., Protter, P. (1998). Asymptotic error distributions for the Euler method for stochastic differential equations. Annals of Probability, 26, 267–307.
Jacod, J., Protter, P. (2012). Discretization of processes. New York: Springer.
Jacod, J., Shiryaev, A. N. (2003). Limit theorems for stochastic processes. New York: Springer.
Jacod, J., Li, Y., Mykland, P. A., Podolskij, M., Vetter, M. (2009). Microstructure noise in the continuous case: The pre-averaging approach. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 119, 2249–2276.
Kinnebrock, S., Podolskij, M. (2008). A note on the central limit theorem for bipower variation of general functions. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 118, 1056–1070.
Koike, Y. (2016). Quadratic covariation estimation of an irregularly observed semimartingale with jumps and noise. Bernoulli, 22, 1894–1936.
Koike, Y. (2017). Time endogeneity and an optimal weight function in pre-averaging covariance estimation. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, 20, 15–56.
Kozhan, R., Neuberger, A., Schneider, P. (2013). The skew risk premium in the equity index market. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 2174–2203.
Li, Y., Mykland, P. A., Renault, E., Zhang, L., Zheng, X. (2014). Realized volatility when sampling times are possibly endogenous. Econometric Theory, 30, 580–605.
Liptser, R. S., Shiryayev, A. N. (1989). Theory of martingales. New York: Springer.
Liu, Z., Wang, K., Liu, J. (2014) . Realized skewness at high frequency and the link to a conditional market premium. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224216.
Martellini, L., Ziemann, V. (2009). Improved estimates of higher-order comoments and implications for portfolio selection. Review of Financial Studies, 23(4), 1465–1502.
Martin, O., Vetter, M. (2016) Testing for simultaneous jumps in case of asynchronous observations. arXiv:1606.07246.
Mitton, T., Vorkink, K. (2007). Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Review of Financial Studies, 20(4), 1255–1288.
Neuberger, A. (2012). Realized skewness. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 3423–3455.
Novikov, A. (1975). On discontinuous martingales. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 20, 11–26.
Podolskij, M., Vetter, M. (2009). Estimation of volatility functionals in the simultaneous presence of microstructure noise and jumps. Bernoulli, 15, 634–658.
Podolskij, M., Vetter, M. (2010). Understanding limit theorems for semimartingales: A short survey. Statistica Neerlandica, 64, 329–351.
Vetter, M., Zwingmann, T. (2017). A note on central limit theorems for quadratic variation in case of endogenous observation times. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 11, 963–980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to thank the Editor, the Association Editor and two anonymous referees for their very extensive and constructive suggestions that helped to improve the paper considerably. Koike’s work is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16K17105, JP17H01100; Liu’s work is partially supported by FDCT of Macau (No. 078/2013/A3 and No. 202/2017/A3) and NSFC (No. 71471173).
About this article
Cite this article
Koike, Y., Liu, Z. Asymptotic properties of the realized skewness and related statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 71, 703–741 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-018-0659-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-018-0659-8