Skip to main content
Log in

Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creation of a ranked set sample, by its nature, involves judgment ranking error within set units. This ranking error usually distorts statistical inference of the population characteristics. Tests may have inflated sizes, confidence intervals may have incorrect coverage probabilities, and the estimators may become biased. In this paper, we develop an exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile shift between two populations based on ranked set samples. This test is based on two independent exact confidence intervals for the quantile of interest corresponding to the two populations and rejects the null hypothesis of equal quantiles if these intervals are disjoint. It is shown that a pair of 83 and 93% confidence intervals provide a 5 and 1% test for the equality of quantiles. The proposed test is calibrated for the effect of judgment ranking error so that the test has the correct size even under a wide range of judgment ranking errors. A small scale simulation study suggests that the test performs quite well for cycle sizes as small as 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold B.C., Balakrishnan N., Nagaraja H.N. (1992). A first course in order statistics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N., Li T. (2006). Confidence intervals for quantiles and tolerance intervals based on ordered ranked set samples. Annals of Institute of Statistical Mathematics 58: 757–777

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn L.L., Wolfe D.A. (1992). Nonparametric two-sample procedures for ranked-set sample data. Journal of the American Statisttical Association 87: 552–562

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn L.L., Wolfe D.A. (1994). The effect of imperfect judgment rankings on properties of procedures based on the ranked-set samples analog of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 168–176

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z. (2000). On ranked set sample quantiles and their applications. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 83: 125–135

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • David H.A., Levine D.N. (1972). Ranked set sampling in the presence of judgment error. Biometrics 28: 553–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellT.R., Clutter J.L. (1972). Ranked-set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28: 545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande J.V., Frey J., Ozturk O. (2006). Nonparametric ranked-set sampling confidence intervals for quantile of a finite population. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 13: 25–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fligner M., MacEachern S.N. (2006). Ranked set sampling: Models and distribution free two sample methods under imperfect ranking. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101: 1107–1118

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J. (2005). Inference procedures based on order statistics. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

  • Gibbons J.D. (1985). Nonparametric statistical inference. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, D. R., Hirsch, R. M. (2002). Statistical Methods in Water Resources, U. S. Geological Surveys, http:/water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3.

  • McIntyre G.A. (1952). A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked-sets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre G.A. (2005). A method of unbiased selective sampling using ranked sets. The American Statistician 3: 230–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O. (1999). Two-sample inference based on one-sample ranked set sample sign statistics. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 10: 197–212

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, O. (2007). Statistical inference under a stochastic ordering constraint in ranked set sampling. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics (in print).

  • Ozturk O., DeshpandeJ.V. (2006). Ranked-set sample nonparametric quantile confidence intervals. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136: 570–577

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O., MacEachern S. (2004). Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison. Annals of Institute of Statistical Mathematics 56: 701–720

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O., Wolfe D.A. (2000). Optimal allocation procedure in ranked set two-sample median test. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 13: 57–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk O., Wolfe D.A. (2001). An improved ranked set two-sample Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. Canadian Journal of Statistics 28: 123–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rice J. (1995). Mathematical statistics and data analysis (2nd ed.). Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omer Ozturk.

About this article

Cite this article

Ozturk, O., Balakrishnan, N. Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples. Ann Inst Stat Math 61, 235–249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-007-0141-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-007-0141-5

Keywords

Navigation