Skip to main content
Log in

Exponentially tilted empirical distribution function for ranked set samples

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study nonparametric estimation of the distribution function (DF) of a continuous random variable based on a ranked set sampling design using the exponentially tilted (ET) empirical likelihood method. We propose ET estimators of the DF and use them to construct new resampling algorithms for unbalanced ranked set samples. We explore the properties of the proposed algorithms. For a hypothesis testing problem about the underlying population mean, we show that the bootstrap tests based on the ET estimators of the DF are asymptotically normal and exhibit a small bias of order O(n−1). We illustrate the methods and evaluate the finite sample performance of the algorithms under both perfect and imperfect ranking schemes using a real data set and several Monte Carlo simulation studies. We compare the performance of the test statistics based on the ET estimators with those based on the empirical likelihood estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S., Lim, J., & Wang, X. (2014). The Student’st approximation to distributions of pivotal statistics from ranked set samples. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 43(4), 643–652.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, S., Jafari Jozani, M., & Modarres, R. (2014). Resampling unbalanced ranked set sampling with application in testing hypothesis about the population mean. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 19, 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baklizi, A. (2009). Empirical likelihood intervals for the population mean and quantiles based on balanced ranked set samples. Statistical Methods and Applications, 18(4), 483–505.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, S., & Ghosh, M. (2011). Empirical likelihood for small area estimation. Biometrika, 98(2), 473–480.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Bai, Z., & Sinha, B. K. (2004). Ranked set sampling: theory and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, T. R., & Clutter, J. L. (1972). Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCiccio, T. J., & Romano, J. P. (1990). Nonparametric confidence limits by resampling methods and least favourable families. International Statistical Review, 58, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals (with discussion). The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 9, 139–172.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerveger, A., Robinson, J., & Wong, A. (1999). On the relative accuracy of certain bootstrap procedures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 225–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J., Ozturk, O., & Deshpande, J. V. (2007). Nonparametric tests for perfect judgment rankings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 708–717.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J., & Wang, L. (2013). Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 60, 157–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1992). The bootstrap and edgeworth expansion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari Jozani, M., & Johnson, B. C. (2012). Randomized nomination sampling for finite populations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142, 2103–2115.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. K. (2010). Calibration estimation using exponential tilting in sample surveys. Survey Methodology, 36(2), 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostov, P. (2012). Empirical likelihood estimation of the spatial quantile regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 15(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Balakrishnan, N. (2008). Some simple nonparametric methods to test for perfect ranking in ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138, 1325–1338.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Lin, N., & Zhang, B. (2009). Empirical likelihood for balanced ranked-set sampled data. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 52(6), 1351–1364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, R., Hui, T. P., & Zhang, G. (2006). Resampling methods for ranked set samples. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 1039–1050.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A. B. (2001). Empirical likelihood. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, O., & Jafari Jozani, M. (2014). Inclusion probabilities in partially rank ordered set sampling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 69, 122–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schennach, S. M. (2005). Bayesian exponentially-tilted empirical likelihood. Biometrika, 92, 31–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schennach, S. M. (2007). Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Annals of Statistics, 35(2), 634–672.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S. L., & Sager, T. W. (1988). Characterization of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(402), 374–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vock, M., & Balakrishnan, N. (2011). A Jonckheere-Terpstra-type test for perfect ranking in balanced ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 624–630.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Ranked set sampling: its relevance and impact on statistical inference. In International scholarly research notices.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Amiri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amiri, S., Jafari Jozani, M. & Modarres, R. Exponentially tilted empirical distribution function for ranked set samples. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 45, 176–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2015.09.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2015.09.004

AMS 2000 subject classifications

Keywords

Navigation