Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Avian diversity in a temperate tree-based intercropping system from inception to now

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 March 2016

Abstract

Migratory bird populations in North America have been declining over the last several decades, largely due to habitat loss and forest cover fragmentation in both their summer breeding ranges and overwintering territories. Tree-based intercropping (TBI), which is a land-use system incorporating trees with agricultural crops on the same unit of land, is an alternative to conventional agriculture that provisions many ecological and environmental benefits in conjunction with agricultural production. This study seeks to assess the contributions of temperate TBI systems on avian biodiversity, and to quantify these changes as they develop in time. Standard bird monitoring protocols were used to examine avian communities in a TBI system at the University of Guelph’s Agroforestry Research Site in 2014 and compared to a similar study completed by Williams et al. in 1995 at the same site. The TBI system surveys were then compared to present (2014) and past (1995) avian communities living in other nearby agro-ecosystems including an abandoned field, conventional monocrop field, a willow plantation and a mature woodlot. The avian species richness and diversity at the TBI site was higher in 2014 (32 species; diversity index of 2.9) than in 1995 (17 species; diversity index of 2.2). Among land-use types, avian species richness was highest at the TBI site in both 2014 (32 species vs. 26, 24, 21, and 15) and 1995 (17 species vs. 7 and 4). The results of this study suggest that TBI systems may help to maintain and even enhance avian diversity in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspinall A, Malik A, Satel A, He Z (2009) Urban forest strategic management plan for the Township of Centre Wellington. Elora Environment Centre. http://www.ecee.on.ca/docs/NeighbourWoods-CentreWellingtonSUFMP-2009apr08.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2014

  • Bainard L, Koch A, Gordon A, Klironomos J (2013) Growth response of crops to soil microbial communities from conventional monocropping and tree-based intercropping systems. Plant Soil 363:345–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakermans M, Rodewald A, Vitz A, Rengifo C (2012) Migratory bird use of shade coffee: the role of structural and floristic features. Agroforest Syst 85:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird Studies Canada (2000) The marsh monitoring program quality assurance project plan. Bird Studies Canada. http://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/mmpqualplan.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2014

  • Cormier R, Gardali T, Wood J (2013) Assessing migratory stopover site quality for birds during fall migration along two California rivers. Western N Am Nat 73:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crins W, Gray P, Uhlig P, Wester M (2009) The ecosystems of Ontario, part I: ecozones and ecoregions. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. http://cnvc-cnvc.ca/uploads/the_ecosystems_of_ontario_part_1-ecozones_and_ecoregions_2009-corrected-june_2010.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2014

  • DeGraaf R, Yamasaki M (2003) Options for managing early-successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the northeastern United States. Forest Ecol Manag 185:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz I, Armesto J, Reid S, Sieving K, Willson M (2005) Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloé Island, Chile. Biol Conserv 123:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domokos E, Cristea V (2014) Effects of managed forests structure on woodpeckers (Picidae) in the Niraj valley (Romania): woodpecker populations in managed forests. North-West J Zool 10:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei B, Nocera J, Fyles J (2015) Interspecific competition and nest survival of the threatened Red-headed Woodpecker. J Ornithol 156:743–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie AR, Miller BK, Johnson KD (1995) Effects of ground cover on tree survival and growth in filter strips of the Cornbelt Region of the midwestern US. Agric Ecosyst Environ 53:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Gonzalez Villalobos JA (2007) Agroforestry sys- tems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff M, Bettinger K, Ferguson H, Brown M, Altman B (2000) A habitat-based point-count protocol protocol for terrestrial birds, emphasizing Washington and Oregon. USDA Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/gtr501.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2014

  • Jablonski K, McNulty S, Schlesinger M (2010) A digital spot-mapping method for avian field studies. Wilson J Ornithol 122:772–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and envi- ronmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir EM, Webb EL (2009) Can homegardens conserve bio- diversity in Bangladesh? Biotropica 40:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp D, Mendenhall C, Sandí R, Chaumont N, Ehrlich P, Hadly E, Daily G (2013) Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecol Lett 16:1339–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay Q (1985) Nectar from willow catkins as a food source for Blue Tits. Bird Study 32:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzys G, Waite T, Stapanian M, Vucetich J (2002) Assessing avian richness in remnant wetlands: towards an improved methodology. Wetlands 22:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell C, Riffell S, Kaiser S, Battin A, Smith M, Sisk T (2007) Edge responses of tropical and temperate birds. Wilson J Ornithol 119:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr S, Gauthreaux S, Kilgo J (2002) Importance of coarse woody debris to avian communities in loblolly pine forests. Conserv Biol 16:767–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Zhu P, Gurr G, Zheng X, Read D, Heong K, Yang Y, Xu H (2014) Mechanisms for flowering plants to benefit arthropod natural enemies of insect pests: prospects for enhanced use in agriculture. Insect Sci 21:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod C, Blackwell G, Benge J (2012) Reduced pesticide toxicity and increased woody vegetation cover account for enhanced native bird densities in organic orchards: orchard management and native birds. J Appl Ecol 49:652–660

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken J (2014) Are aerial insectivores being ‘bugged out’? Bird Watch Canada. http://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/BWCwi08.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2014

  • McMahon B, Carnus T, Whelan J (2013) A comparison of winter bird communities in agricultural grassland and cereal habitats in Ireland: implications for Common Agricultural Policy reform. Bird Study 60:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody K, Spoerndli C, Dorn S (2011) Within-orchard variability of the ecosystem service “parasitism”: effects of cultivars, ants and tree location. Basic Appl Ecol 12:456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H (2002) Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Appl Geogr 22:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nebel S, Mills A, McCracken J, Taylor P (2010) Declines of aerial insectivores in North America follow a geographic gradient. Avian Conserv Ecol 5:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttle T, Leidolf A, Burger L Jr, Loiselle B (2003) Assessing conservation value of bird communities with partners in flight-based ranks. Auk 120:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partners in Flight Science Committee (2012) Species assessment database, version 2012. Partners in Flight. http://rmbo.org/pifassessment. Accessed 23 July 2014

  • Pekin B, Pijanowski B (2012) Global land use intensity and the endangerment status of mammal species. Divers Distrib 18:909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen B (2002) Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11:1551–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph C, Droege S, Sauer J (1995) Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. USDA Forest Service. http://wwwtest.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/gtr-149/pg161_168.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2014

  • Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment (2014) Forest birds survey protocol. Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=bcaf2087-feef-4e7e-acbf-e788a0734e71. Accessed 18 May 2014

  • Schlossberg S (2009) Postlogging succession and habitat usage of shrubland birds. J Wildl Manag 73:226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small E (2011) The new Noah’s Ark: beautiful and useful species only. Part 1. Biodiversity conservation issues and priorities. Biodiversity 12:232–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskar A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiv Cons 10:1839–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury B (2007) Silence of the songbirds: how we are losing the world’s songbirds and what we can do to save them. Harper Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan N, Gordon A (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 61:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Thogmartin W, Howe F, James F, Johnson D, Reed E, Sauer J, Thompson F III (2006) A review of the population estimation approach of the North American Landbird conservation plan. Auk 123:892–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryjanowski P, Sparks T, Jerzak L, Rosin Z, Skórka P (2014) A paradox for conservation: electricity pylons may benefit avian diversity in intensive farmland. Conserv Lett 7:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein A, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twedt D, Wilson A, Henne-Kerr J, Hamilton R (1999) Impact of forest type and management strategy on avian densities in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. For Ecol Manag 123:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J, Perfecto I, Philpott S (2010) Ecological complexity and pest control in organic coffee production: uncovering an autonomous ecosystem service. Bioscience 60:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasileiadis V, Moonen A, Sattin M, Otto S, Pons X, Kudsl P, Veres A, Dorner Z, van der Weide R, Marraccini E, Pelzer E, Angevin F, Kiss J (2013) Sustainability of European maize-based cropping systems: economic, environmental and social assessment of current and proposed innovative IPM-based systems. Eur J Agron 48:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove D, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Koblents H, Gordon A (1995) Bird use of an intercropped corn field and old field in southern Ontario, Canada. In: Ehrenreich JH, Ehrenreich DL and Lee HW (eds) Proceedings of 4th North American agroforestry conference, Boise, 23–28 July 1995, pp 158–162

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge past funding contributions from OMAFRA in support of agroforestry research at the University of Guelph.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

    Sophie Gibbs, Brent Coleman, Andrew Gordon & Naresh Thevathasan

  2. City of Halifax, Halifax, NS, B3J 3A5, Canada

    Hanita Koblents

  3. Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada

    Brent Coleman

  4. Williams and Associates, Rockwood, ON, N0B 2K0, Canada

    Peter Wiliams

Authors
  1. Sophie Gibbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanita Koblents
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brent Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naresh Thevathasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Wiliams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Gordon.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9919-x.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibbs, S., Koblents, H., Coleman, B. et al. Avian diversity in a temperate tree-based intercropping system from inception to now. Agroforest Syst 90, 905–916 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9901-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9901-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation