Skip to main content
Log in

A Mathematical Model for Alternation of Polygamy and Parthenogenesis: Stability Versus Efficiency and Analogy with Parasitism

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work is a contribution to the understanding of the sempiternal problem of the “burden of factor two” implied by sexual reproduction versus asexual one, as males are energy consumers not contributing to the production of offspring. We construct a deterministic mathematical model in population dynamics where a species enjoys both sexual and parthenogenetic capabilities of reproduction and lives on a limited resource. We then show how polygamy implies instability of a parthenogenetic population with a small number of sexually born males. This instability implies evolution of the system towards an attractor involving both (sexual and asexual) populations (which does not imply optimality of the population). We also exhibit the analogy with a parasite/host system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is obviously possible to carry out all the ulterior developments in terms of the populations of males and females instead of sexually-born and asexually-born. According to (4) there is an equivalence between both descriptions. Biologists prefer the x and y description as it emphasizes the reproduction way instead of the sex of individuals.

References

  • Busch JW, Delph LF (2012) The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization. Ann Bot 109:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vienne DM, Giraud T, Guyon PH (2013) Lineage selection and the maintenance of sex. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igic B, Busch JW (2013) Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? N Phytol 198:386–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepers C, Dufay M, Billiard S (2014) How does pollination mutualism affect the evolution of prior self-fertilization? A model. Evolution 68–12:3581–3598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lherminier P, Sanchez-Palencia E (2015) Some remarks and examples on transient processes and attractors in biological evolution. Electron J Differ Equ Conf 22:63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SI, Kalisz S, Slotte T (2013) Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proc R Soc B 280:20130133l

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Françoise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchez-Palencia, E., Lherminier, P. & Françoise, JP. A Mathematical Model for Alternation of Polygamy and Parthenogenesis: Stability Versus Efficiency and Analogy with Parasitism. Acta Biotheor 64, 537–552 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-016-9293-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-016-9293-0

Keywords

Navigation