Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of photodynamic therapy on quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration in Korea

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess quality of life (QOL) changes in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) before and after treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Methods

In 625 patients with AMD, the EuroQol Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) for general health status and the Visual Function Questionnaire (VF-4D) for vision-related reading ability, independence, and fear for the future were used and the results compared between within 1 week before PDT and 1 year after PDT. Subscale QOL changes were also scored with the Korean versions of EQ-5D and VF-4D.

Results

EQ-5D scores of male patients were higher than those of female patients (P < 0.05), and scores of unilateral patients were higher than those of bilateral patients (P < 0.001). Among all patients, 41.2% had a higher EQ-5D score after PDT. The mean differences between before and after treatment, estimated by three different models, the Korean model, the UK model, and the Japanese model, were all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Utility measured by the VF-4D score after PDT increased by 16.1% (P < 0.001), and subscale utilities indicated significant improvements in fear for the future (21.1%), reading ability (16.6%–14.5%), and independence (11.6%).

Conclusions

PDT for patients with AMD improved both general health-related QOL and vision-related QOL, as well as subscale scores, as evaluated by EQ-5D and VF-4D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992;99: 933–943.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, et al. The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1128–1134.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferris FL III. Senile macular degeneration: review of epidemiologic features. Am J Epidemiol 1983;118:132–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chopdar A, Chakravarthy U, Verma D. Age related macular degeneration. BMJ 2003;326:485–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Joyce CRB. Requirements for the assessment of individual quality of life. In: McGee HM, Bradley C. editors. Quality of life following renal failure: psychosocial challenges accompanying high technology medicine. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic; 1994. p. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGee HM, O’Boyle CA, Hickey A, O’Malley K, Joyce CRB. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med 1991;21:749–759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH, Kim EJ, Kim SJ. A cost-utility analysis of ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration in South Korea. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell J, Bradley C. Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with are-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1893–1900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chia EM, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Smith W, Cumming RR, Mitchell P. Impact of bilateral visual impairment on health related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:71–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hewitt AW, Jeganathan VS, Kidd JE, Pesudovs K, Verma N. Influence of photodynamic therapy for age related macular degeneration upon subjective vision related quality of life. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:972–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyo T, Matsumoto Y, Tochigi K, et al. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration after photodynamic therapy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2006;110: 710–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kyo T, Yuzawa M, Tochigi K, et al. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration 1 year after photodynamic therapy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2007;111: 315–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laouar K, Dupeyron G, Audemard D, Arnaud B, Arndt C. Quality of life in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with photodynamic therapy. J Fr Ophthalmol 2007;30: 233–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Luke M, Ziemssen F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gelisken F. Quality of life in a prospective, randomized pilot-trial of photodynamic therapy versus full macular translocation in treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration-a report of 1 year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1831–1836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: 5-year results of two randomized clinical trials with an open-label extension: TAP Report No. 8. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:1132–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Japanese Age-Related Macular Degeneration Trial (JAT) Study Group. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in Japanese patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD): results of the Japanese AMD trial (JAT) extension. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2008;52:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez-Pastor LJ, Ortega A, Garcia-Layana A, Giraldez J. Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab with photodynamic treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ther 2008;30: 2463–2451.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JH, Kim SJ. Quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with photodynamic therapy. A paper presented at the 98th annual conference of Korea Retina Society, November 2007.

  21. Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) and Verteporfin In Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Study Groups. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization with verteporfin: fluorescein angiographic guidelines for evaluation and treatment—TAP and VIP Report No. 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1253–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown GC, Sharma S, Brown MM, Kistler J. Utility values and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmology 2000;118: 47–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma S, Brown GC, Brown MM, et al. Converting visual acuity to utilities. Can J Ophthalmol 2000;35:267–272.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S, Busbee B. Quality of life associated with visual loss: A time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states. Am Acad Ophthalmol 2003;110: 1076–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bush JW. General health policy model: quality of well-being (QWB) scale. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, editors. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: LeJacq; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee DW, Kwon OW. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization-Interval and number of application of verteporfin therapy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2004;45:736–743.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, et al. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4016–4023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradley C. Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. Lancet 2001;357:7–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Childs AL, Bressler NM, Bass EB, et al. Surgery for hemorrhagic choroidal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: quality of life findings: SST report no. 14. Ophthalmology 2004;111: 2007–2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamashiro K, Tsujikawa A, Nishida A, Kurimoto, Y. Determinants of patient satisfaction with photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:368–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ha Kyoung Kim.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Kwak, H.W., Lee, W.K. et al. Impact of photodynamic therapy on quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration in Korea. Jpn J Ophthalmol 54, 325–330 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-010-0825-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-010-0825-x

Keywords

Navigation