Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of spinosad with three traditional grain protectants against Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) at different temperatures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The insecticidal effects of deltamethrin, chlorpyriphos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl, and spinosad were evaluated against adults of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and larvae of Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Spinosad was applied at 1 and 0.5 ppm, deltamethrin at 0.5 ppm, chlorpyriphos-methyl at 2.25 ppm, and pirimiphos-methyl at 4 ppm. All tests were carried out on wheat for E. kuehniella and in maize for P. truncatus, at three temperature levels, 20, 25, and 30 °C. Mortality of the exposed individuals of P. truncatus was measured after 7, 14, and 21 days of exposure, and 60 days later, the progeny production in the treated and untreated substrate was recorded. In the case of Ephestia kuehniella, mortality was assessed after 25 days. Spinosad was highly effective against P. truncatus adults, even at 0.5 ppm, but 1 ppm provided a better “speed of kill” and a higher suppression of progeny production. Mortality of the exposed P. truncatus adults after 21 days of exposure on maize treated with 0.5 ppm of spinosad was 100 %, regardless of the temperature level tested. A complete (100 %) mortality level was also noted in the case of maize treated with deltamethrin and pirimiphos-methyl, while in the case of chlorpyriphos-methyl, mortality at the 21 day exposure ranged between 61 and 90 %. Progeny production was completely suppressed only on maize treated with deltamethrin. In contrast, pirimiphos-methyl was the most effective grain protectant for E. kuehniella, since mortality was usually <99 %. In general, for both species tested, temperature had a significant effect on mortality, but this trend was different at different insecticides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur FH (1996) Grain protectants: current status and prospects for the future. J Stored Prod Res 32:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur FH, Throne JE (2003) Efficacy of diatomaceous earth to control internal infestations of rice weevil and maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Econ Entomol 96:510–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Chintzoglou GJ (2008a) Effectiveness of spinosad dust against different European populations of the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val. J Stored Prod Res 44:47–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Chintzoglou GJ, Peteinatos GG, Boukouvala MC, Petrou SS, Panoussakis EC (2008b) Effect of temperature and grain on insecticidal efficacy of spinosad dust against Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). J Econ Entomol 101:976–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Yiatilis AE, Vayias BJ, Mavrotas CS, Tomanovic Z (2008c) Influence of temperature and humidity on the efficacy of spinosad against four stored-grain beetle species. J Insect Sci 8:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou CG, Arthur FH, Throne JE (2009) Efficacy of grain protectants against four psocid species on maize, rice and wheat. Pest Manag Sci 65:1140–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daglish GJ (2008) Impact of resistance on the efficacy of binary combinations of spinosad, chlorpyriphos-methyl and s-methoprene against five stored-grain beetles. J Stored Prod Res 44:71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daglish GJ, Head MB, Hughes PB (2008) Field evaluation of spinosad as a grain protectant for stored wheat inAustralia: efficacy against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) and fate of residues in whole wheat and milling fractions. Aust J Entomol 47:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang L, Subramanyam B (2003) Activity of spinosad against adults of Rhyzopertha dominica (F) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) is not affected by wheat temperature and moisture. J Kansas Entomol Soc 76:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang L, Subramanyam B, Dolder S (2002) Persistence and efficacy of spinosad residues in farm stored wheat. J Econ Entomol 95:1102–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Getchell AI, Subramanyam B (2008) Immediate and delayed mortality of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults exposed to spinosad-treated grain. J Econ Entomol 101:1022–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golob P (2002) Chemical, physical and cultural control of Prostephanus truncatus. Integr Pest Manag Rev 7:245–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertlein MB, Thompson GD, Subramanyam B, Athanassiou CG (2011) Spinosad: a new natural product for stored grain protection. J Stored Prod Res 46:151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MG, Borgemeister C, Nansen C (2002) Ecological studies on the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Col.: Bostrichidae) and their implications for integrated pest management. Integr Pest Manag Rev 7:201–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Subramanyam B (2003) Responses of Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) to primiphos-methyl, spinosad, and combinations of pirimiphos-methyl and synergized pyrethrins. Pest Manag Sci 60:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Subramanyam B (2007) Effectiveness of spinosad against seven major stored-grain insects on corn. Insect Sci 14:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutambuki K, Ngatia CM, Mbugua JN, Likhayo P (2002) Evaluation of the efficacy of spinosad dust against major storage insect pests. In: Credland PF, Armitage DM, Bell CH, Cogan PM, Highley E (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international working conference on stored-product protection. CAB International, Wallington, pp 888–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak MK, Daglish GJ (2007) Combined treatments of spinosad and chlorpyrifos-methyl for management of resistant psocid pests (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae) of stored grain. Pest Manag Sci 63:104–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DG, Bret BL (1997) Fate of spinosad in the environment. Down Earth 52:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek JD, Weston PA, Barney RJ (1995) Lepidoptera and Psocoptera. In: Subramanyam B, Hagstrum DW (eds) Integrated management of insects in stored products. Marcel Decker, New York, pp 41–70

  • Subramanyam B (2006) Performance of spinosad as a stored-grain protectant. In: Lorini I, Bacaltchuk B, Beckel H, Deckers D, Sundfeld E, dos Santos JP, Biagi JD, Celaro JC, Faroni LRDA, Bortolini de OFL, Sartori MR, Elias MC, Guedes RNC, da Fonseca RG, Scussel VM (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international working conference for stored-product protection, 15–18 Oct 2006. Campinas, ABRAPOS, Säo Paulo, pp 250–257

  • Thompson GD, Dutton R, Sparks TC (2000) Spinosad-a case study: an example from a natural products discovery program. Pest Manag Sci 56:696–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler PS, Hodges RJ (2002) Phytosanitary measures against larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), in international trade. Integr Pest Manag Rev 7:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vayias BJ, Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Tatsi G (2010) Insecticidal action of the combined use of spinosad and deltamethrin against three stored product pests in two stored hard wheat varieties. In: Carvalho OM, Fields PG, Adler CS, Arthur FH, Athanassiou CG, Campbell JF, Fleurat-Lessard F, Flinn PW, Hodges RJ, Isikber AA, Navarro S, Noyes RT, Riudavets J, Sinha KK, Thorpe GR, Timlick BH, Trematerra P, White NDG (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored product protection, 27 June–2 July 2010, Estoril, Julius-Kühn-Archiv 425, ISBN: 978-3-930037-65-0, Berlin, pp 921–924

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the research projects 34.115 and 34.154 (Research Committee, Agricultural University of Athens). The authors would like to thank Elanco, Syngenta, and Bayer for providing the insecticides for experimentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos G. Athanassiou.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Traugott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozidi-Metaxa, E., Athanassiou, C.G. Comparison of spinosad with three traditional grain protectants against Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) at different temperatures. J Pest Sci 86, 203–210 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-012-0445-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-012-0445-y

Keywords

Navigation