Abstract
Three new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods, air-assisted (AA-DLLME), vortex-assisted (VA-DLLME) and ultrasound-assisted (UA-DLLME), were compared from the point of view of their analytical application for preconcentration of trace amounts of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene isomers (BTEX) in water samples. In all of these methods, no dispersive solvent is required and dispersion of extractant is carried out by air bubbles, vortex and ultrasound for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively. Advantages and disadvantages of these three liquid phase microextraction methods and their capability in dispersion of a similar extractant phase in sample solutions were comprehensively compared. All other extraction parameters, which have an influence on the microextraction, were also investigated and optimized. Under optimized conditions, analytical figures of merit for the three techniques were determined and compared. It was found that the limit of detection of the three methods is almost the same, while AA-DLLME has a wider linear dynamic range and the shortest analysis time. Enrichment factors of 182, 45 and 245 were achieved for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashemi SH, Kaykhaii M, Khajeh M (2015) Anal Lett 48:1815–1829
Müller E, Berger R, Blass E, Sluyts D, Pfennig A (1985) Liquid–liquid extraction. Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Han D, Row KH (2012) Microchim Acta 176:1–22
Spietelun A, Marcinkowski Ł, de la Guardia M, Namieśnik J (2014) Talanta 119:34–45
Rezaee M, Assadi Y, Hosseini MRM, Aghaee E, Ahmadi F, Berijani S (2006) J Chromatogr A 1116:1–9
Mirmoghaddam M, Kaykhaii M, Yahyavi H (2015) Anal Methods 7:8511–8523
Zhang H, Chen X, Jiang X (2011) Anal Chim Acta 689:137–142
Viñas P, Campillo N, Andruch V (2015) TrAC Trends Anal 68:48–77
Pusvaškienė E, Jurkina A, Vičkačkaitė V (2009) Chemija 20:175–179
Assadi Y, Ahmadi F, Hossieni MM (2010) Chromatographia 71:1137–1141
Faraji H, Tehrani RMA (2012) Int J Ind Chem 3:1–8
Vickackaite V, Pusvaskiene E (2009) J Sep Sci 32:3512–3520
Leong MI, Huang SD (2012) J Sep Sci 35:688–694
Khajeh M, Zadeh FM (2012) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:38–43
Hashemi M, Jahanshahi N, Habibi A (2012) Desalination 288:93–97
Kokosa JM (2013) TrAC Trends Anal Chem 43:2–13
Farajzadeh MA, Khoshmaram L (2013) Food 141:1881–1887
Zhang L, Chen F, Liu S, Chen B, Pan C (2012) J Sep Sci 35:2514–2519
Picó Y (2013) TrAC Trends Anal Chem 43:84–99
Rahmani M, Kaykhaii M, Ghasemi E, Tahernejad M (2015) J Chromatogr Sci 53:1210–1216
Yahyavi H, Kaykhaii M, Hashemi M (2016) RSC Adv 6:2361–2367
Farajzadeh MA, Mogaddam MRA (2012) Anal Chim Acta 728:31–38
Yazdi AS, Amiri AH (2008) Es’haghi Z. Chemosphere 71:671–676
Yazdi AS, Amiri AH (2009) Es, hagi Z. Talanta 78:936–941
Kaykhaii M, Moradi M (2008) J Chromatogr Sci 46:413–418
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the University of Sistan and Baluchestan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahmani, M., Kaykhaii, M., Safari, Z. et al. Comparison of Air-Assisted, Vortex-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Determination of BTEX Compounds in Water Samples Prior to GC-FID Analysis. Chromatographia 80, 109–117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3216-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3216-8