Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous Determination and Drug Dissolution Testing of Combined Amlodipine Tablet Formulations Using RP-LC

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the proposed work, the simultaneous analysis of amlodipine–rosuvastatin and amlodipine–atorvastatin in their dosage forms was achieved. Simultaneous dissolution profiles of the amlodipine–rosuvastatin and amlodipine–atorvastatin tablets are realized using Apparatus II with a simple, accurate and precise RP-LC method. The mobile phase consisting of 0.2 % H3PO4 and pH 5:methanol:acetonitrile (46:27:27) was used. The samples of 10 µL were injected onto a Zorbax SB C18 (100 mm, 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) column with 1.2 µL min−1 flow rate. The samples were detected at 236 nm. By plotting peak area ratios vs. concentration, the linearity for amlodipine–rosuvastatin and amlodipine–atorvastatin was determined. With the developed RP-LC method, AML, ROS and ATOR were detected within the range of 0.25–10, 0.5–10 and 0.25–25 µg mL−1, respectively. LOD and LOQ values were also calculated as 0.028, 0.058, 0.021 and 0.095 µg mL−1, 0.195 µg mL−1, 0.070 µg mL−1 for AML, ROS and ATOR, respectively. System suitability tests parameters, such as capacity factor, selectivity to previous peak, selectivity to next peak, resolution to previous peak, resolution to next peak, tailing factor, theoretical number of plates, were performed and found coherent with the ICH guideline parameters. The proposed method has been extensively validated in terms of recovery, and recovery results were between 99 and 101 %. For proving the precision, between-day and within-day repeatability results of the method were proposed. The method can be used for the simultaneous determination of amlodipine–rosuvastatin and amlodipine–atorvastatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karthikeyan VJ (2005) Adverse effects of statins: an update. Adverse Drug React Bull 233:895–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaldara E, Sanoudou D, Adamopoulos S, Nanas JN (2015) Outpatient management of chronic heart failure. Expert Opin Pharmacother 16:17–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Endo A (1992) The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. J Lipid Res 33:1569–1582

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schultheis A (1990) Hypercholesterolemia: prevention, detection and management. Nurse Pract 15:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein EA (1989) Management of hypercholesterolemia: approach to diet and drug therapy. Am J Med 87:S20–S27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meredith PA, Elliott HL (1992) Clinical pharmacokinetics of amlodipine. Clin Pharmacokinet 22:22–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang D, Verotta D, Schwartz JB (2006) Population analyses of amlodipine in patients living in the community and patients living in nursing homes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 79:114–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murdoch D, Heel RC (1991) Amlodipine: a review of its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. Drugs 41:478–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haria M, Wagstaff AJ (1995) Amlodipine: a reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. Drugs 50:560–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faulkner JK, Hayden ML, Chasseaud LF, Taylor T (1989) Absorption of amlodipine unaffected by food: solid dose equivalent to solution dose. Arzneimittelforschung 39:799–801

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abernethy DR, Gutkowska J, Winterbottom LM (1990) Effects of amlodipine, a long acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist in ageing hypertension: pharmacodynamics in relation to disposition. Clin Pharmacol Ther 48:76–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfammatter JP, Clericetti-Affolter CC, Truttmann AC, Busch K, Laux-End R, Bianchetti MG (1998) Amlodipine once-daily in systemic hypertension. Eur J Pediatr 157:618–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flynn JT, Newburger JW, Daniels SR, Sanders SP, Portman RJ, Hogg RJ, Saul JP (2004) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of amlodipine in children with hypertension. J Pediatr 145:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweetman SC (ed) (2002) Martindale The complete drug reference, 32nd edn. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 1214–1215

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chong PH, Yim BT (2002) Rosuvastatin for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia. Ann Pharmacother 36:93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. White CM (2002) A review of the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic aspects of rosuvastatin. J Clin Pharmacol 42:963–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kapur NK (2007) Rosuvastatin: a highly potent statin for the prevention and management of coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 5:161–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McKenney JM (2005) Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in treatment of dyslipidemia. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 62:1033–1047

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsson AG (2006) Expanding options with a wider range of rosuvastatin doses. Clin Ther 28:1747–1763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crouse JR (2008) An evaluation of rosuvastatin: pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and tolerability. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4:287–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sweetman SC (ed) (2002) Martindale. The complete drug reference, 32nd edn. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 1389–1390

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lennernäs H (2003) Clinical pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:1141–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Black DM, Bakker-Arkema RG, Nawrocki JW (1998) An overview of the clinical safety profile of atorvastatin (Lipitor), a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Arch Intern Med 158:577–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernini F, Poli A, Paoletti R (2001) Safety of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: focus on atorvastatin. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 15:211–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Malhotra HS, Goa KL (2001) Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia. Drugs 61:1835–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malinowski JM (1998) Atorvastatin: a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 55:2253–2267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweetman SC (ed) (2002) Martindale. The complete drug reference, 32nd edn. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 1218–1219

    Google Scholar 

  28. Löbenberg R, Amidon GL (2000) Modern bioavailability, bioequivalence and biopharmaceutics classification system. New scientific approaches to international regulatory standards. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang DJ, Jeong EJ, Lee HM, Kim BC, Lim SJ, Kim CK (2006) Improvement of bioavailability and photostability of amlodipine using redispersible dry emulsion. Eur J Pharm Sci 28:405–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu CY, Benet LZ (2005) Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm Res 22:11–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. FDA (1997) Guidance for industry: dissolution testing of immediate release solid oral dosage forms

  32. Limberg J, Potthast H (2013) Regulatory status on the role of in vitro dissolution testing in quality control and biopharmaceutics in Europe. Biopharm Drug Dispos 34:247–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The United States Pharmacopeia (The USP 32-NF 27) (2009) The official compendia of standards. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockwille

    Google Scholar 

  34. Swartz ME, Krull IS (1997) Analytical method development and validation. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ermer J, Miller JH (2005) Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH Pub, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Riley CM, Rosanske TW (1996) Development and validation of analytical methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  37. ICH Guidelines Topic (1995) Validation of analytical procedures, methodology international conference on harmonization, Brussels, Belgium

  38. Gumustas M, Kurbanoglu S, Uslu B, Ozkan SA (2013) UPLC versus HPLC on drug analysis: advantageous, applications and their validation parameters. Chromatographia 76:1365–1427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. ICH (2000) Stability testing of new drug substances and products (Q1AR) international conference on harmonization IFPMA, Geneva

  40. Soni T, Chotai N (2010) Assessment of dissolution profile of marketed aceclofenac formulations. J Young Pharm 2:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel N, Chotai N, Patel J, Soni T, Desai J, Patel R (2008) Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles of oxcarbazepine-HP b-CD tablet formulations with marketed oxcarbazepine tablets. Dissol Technol 15:28–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Hunninghake D (1998) Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol 81:582–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, Cain VA, Blasetto JW (2003) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial). Am J Cardiol 92:152–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McTaggart F (2003) Comparative pharmacology of rosuvastatin. Atheroscler Suppl 4(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel A. Ozkan.

Ethics declarations

All authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozkan, C.K., Kurbanoglu, S., Esim, O. et al. Simultaneous Determination and Drug Dissolution Testing of Combined Amlodipine Tablet Formulations Using RP-LC. Chromatographia 79, 1143–1151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3125-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3125-x

Keywords

Navigation