Abstract
The hemispheres of the avian brain are specialized to carry out different functions. Since each eye sends its input mainly to the contralateral hemisphere, birds respond differently to stimuli seen with the left eye than they do to stimuli seen with the right eye. The right hemisphere attends to novel stimuli, which easily distract it from ongoing functions. It assumes control in emergency or stressful conditions. The left hemisphere attends to learnt categories and controls behavior in routine, non-stressful situations. This division of function extends to processing of auditory, olfactory and even magnetic stimuli. Evidence for this comes from a number of avian species, and has been shown in both laboratory and field tests. Knowledge of these specializations is relevant to understanding the behavior of birds in the wild since birds respond in different ways to stimuli on their left and right sides (e.g. preferential response to predators and conspecific on the left side and to prey on the right side) and they choose to view different stimuli with the left or right eye. Individual differences in the strength of visual lateralization are determined by exposure of the embryo to light, versus incubation in the dark, and by the levels of steroid hormones in ovo. The importance of these influences on lateralization is discussed in terms of behavior in the natural habitat. The potential importance of hemispheric dominance in the welfare of birds is also considered.
Zusammenfassung
Die Hemisphären des Vogelhirns sind darauf spezialisiert, verschiedene Funktionen auszuführen. Da jedes Auge Eingänge (input) hauptsächlich zur kontralateralen Hemisphäre schickt, reagieren Vögel in unterschiedlicher Weise auf Stimuli, die sie mit dem linken oder rechten Auge gesehen haben. Die rechte Hemisphäre reagiert auf neue Stimuli, die leicht von alltäglichen Funktionen ablenken. Sie übernimmt auch Kontrolle in Notfällen oder Stress. Die linke Hemisphäre reagiert auf erlernte Kategorien und kontrolliert Verhalten in Routine and nicht-stressigen Situationen. Diese Funktionstrennung gilt auch in der Verarbeitung von visuellen, olfaktorischen und selbst magnetischen Stimuli. Beweise dazu sind bekannt in einer Reihe von Vogelarten und sind in Feld- und Labortests nachgewiesen worden. Erkenntnis dieser Spezialisierungen ist relevant zum Verständnis des Verhaltens von Vögeln in der Wildnis, da Vögel in verschiedener Weise auf Stimuli auf ihrer rechten oder linken Seite reagieren (z.B.: bevorzugterweise auf der linken Seite für Raubtiere und Artgenossen und auf der rechten Seite für Beutetiere), und sie wählen das linke oder rechte Auge, um verschiedene Stimuli zu betrachten. Individuelle Unterschiede in der Stärke der Lateralisierung sind abhängig davon, ob Embryos dem Licht ausgesetzt sind, oder in Dunkelheit bebrütet werden, oder aber von der Menge an steroiden Hormonen in ovo. Die Bedeutung dieser Einflüsse auf Lateralisierung werden hier in Bezug auf Tierverhalten im natürlichen Habitat diskutiert. Die potentielle Bedeutung von Gehirn-hemisphärischer Dominanz in der Wohlfahrt von Vögeln ist ebenso berücksichtigt.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso Y (1998) Lateralization of visual guided behaviour during feeding in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Process 43:257–263
Andrew RJ (1966) Precocious adult behaviour in the young chick. Anim Behav 14:485–580
Andrew RJ, Rogers LJ (2002) The nature of lateralization in tetrapods. In: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 94–125
Andrew RJ, Johnston ANB, Robins A, Rogers LJ (2004) Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralisation in chicks. II. Choice of familiar versus unfamiliar model social partner. Behav Brain Res 155:67–76
Anfora G, Frasnelli E, Maccagnani B, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2010) Behavioural and electrophysiological lateralization in social (Apis mellifera) but not non-social (Osmia cornuta) species of bee. Behav Brain Res 206:236–239
Austin N, Rogers LJ (2011) Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses (Equus caballus). Anim Behav (in press)
Bingman VP, Gagliardo A (2006) Of birds and men: convergent evolution in hippocampal lateralization and spatial cognition. Cortex 42:99–100
Brown C, Margat M (2011) Cerebral lateralization determines hand preferences in Australian parrots. Biol Lett 7:496–498
Bullock SP, Rogers LJ (1992) Hemispheric specialization for the control of copulation in the young chick, and effects of 5a-dihydrotestosterone and 17β-oestradiol. Behav Brain Res 48:9–14
Burt DM, Perret DI (1997) Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia 35:685–693
Casperd LM, Dunbar RIM (1996) Asymmetries in the visual processing of emotional cues during agonistic interactions by gelada baboons. Behav Process 37:57–65
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2009) Effects of embryonic light stimulation on the ability to discriminate left from right in the domestic chick. Behav Brain Res 198:204–246
Chiandetti C, Regolin L, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2005) Effects of light stimulation in embryo on the use of position-specific and object-specific cues in binocular and monocular chicks (Gallus gallus). Behav Brain Res 163:10–17, Erratum (2007) Behav Brain Res 177:175
Chiarello C, Maxfield L (1996) Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down. Brain Cogn 30:81–108
Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379
Daisley JN, Mascalzoni E, Rosa-Salva O, Rugani R, Regolin L (2009) Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:965–981
Daisley JN, Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2010) Logic in an asymmetrical (social) brain: transitive inference in the young domestic chick. Soc Neurosci 5:309–319
Deckel AW (1995) Lateralization of aggressive responses in Anolis. J Exp Zool 272:194–200
Denenberg VH (1981) Hemispheric laterality in animals and the effects of early experience. Behav Brain Sci 4:1–49
Deng C, Rogers LJ (1997) Differential contributions of the two visual pathways to functional lateralization in chicks. Behav Brain Res 87:173–182
Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002a) Factors affecting the development of lateralization in chicks. In: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 206–246
Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002b) Social recognition and approach in the chick: lateralization and effect of visual experience. Anim Behav 63:697–706
Dharmaretnam M, Andrew RJ (1994) Age- and stimulus-specific use of the right and left eyes by domestic chick. Anim Behav 48:1395–1406
Dharmaretnam M, Rogers LJ (2005) Hemispheric specialization and dual processing in strongly versus weakly lateralized chicks. Behav Brain Res 162:62–70
Evans CS, Evans L, Marler P (1993) On the meaning of alarm calls: functional references in avian vocal system. Anim Behav 46:23–28
Franklin WE, Lima SL (2001) Laterality in avian vigilance: do sparrows have a favourite eye? Anim Behav 62:879–885
Freire R, van Dort S, Rogers LJ (2006) Pre- and post- hatching effects of corticosterone treatment on behaviour of the domestic chick. Horm Behav 49:157–165
Ghirlanda S, Vallortigara G (2004) The evolution of brain lateralization: a game theoretical analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:853–857
Groothuis TGG, Carere C, Lipar J, Drent PJ, Schwabl H (2008) Selection on personality in a songbird affects maternal hormone levels tuned to its effect on timing of reproduction. Biol Lett 4:465–467
Gülbetekin E, Güntürkün O, Dural S, Cetinkaya H (2007) Asymmetry of visually guided sexual behaviour in adult Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Laterality 12:321–331
Güntürkün O (1985) Lateralization of visually controlled behaviour in pigeons. Physiol Behav 34:575–577
Güntürkün O (2002) Ontogeny of visual asymmetry in pigeons. In: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–273
Güntürkün O, Hahmann U (1999) Functional subdivisions of the ascending visual pathways in the pigeon. Behav Brain Res 98:193–201
Güntürkün O, Hoferichter H–H (1985) Neglect after section of the left telencephalotectal tract in pigeons. Behav Brain Res 18:1–9
Güntürkün O, Hellman B, Melsbach G, Prior H (1998) Asymmetries of representation in the visual system of pigeons. NeuroReport 9:4127–4130
Güntürkün O, Diekamp B, Manns M, Nottelmann F, Prior H, Schwarz A, Skiba M (2000) Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons. Curr Biol 10:1079–1081
Guo K, Meints K, Hall C, Hall S, Mills D (2009) Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 12:409–418
Harris L (1989) Footedness in parrots: three centuries of research, theory, and mere speculation. Can J Physiol 43:369–396
Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC (2000) Retinal asymmetry in birds. Curr Biol 10:115–117
Hogue M-E, Beaugrand JP, Lague PC (1996) Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger. Behav Process 38:241–252
Hunt GR, Corballis MC, Gray RD (2006) Design complexity and strength of laterality are correlated in new Caledonian crows’ pandanus tool manufacture. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1127–1133
Johnson ANB, Burne THJ, Rose SP (1998) Observation learning in 1 day old chicks using a one-trial passive avoidance learning paradigm. Anim Behav 56:1347–1353
Kaplan G, Johnson G, Koboroff A, Rogers LJ (2009) Alarm calls of the Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen): I. Predators elicit complex vocal responses and mobbing behaviour. Open Ornithol J 2:7–16
Keysers C, Diekamp B, Güntürkün O (2000) Evidence of physiological asymmetries in the intertectal connections of the pigeon (Columba livia) and their potential role in brain lateralisation. Brain Res 852:406–413
Koboroff A, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ (2008) Hemispheric specialization in Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) shown as eye preferences during response to a predator. Brain Res Bull 76:304–306
Koshiba M, Nakamura S, Deng C, Rogers LJ (2003) Light-dependent development of asymmetry in the ipsilateral and contralateral thalamofugal visual projections of the chick. Neurosci Lett 336:81–84
Kuenzel WJ, Masson M (1988) A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the chick (Gallus domesticus). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Land MF (1999) The roles of head movements in the search and capture strategy of a tern (Aves, Laridae). J Comp Physiol A 184:265–272
Levy J (1977) The mammalian brain and the adaptive advantage of cerebral asymmetry. Ann NY Acad Sci 299:264–272
Lippolis G, Joss JMP, Rogers LJ (2009) Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri); a missing link in the evolution of complementary side biases for predator avoidance and prey capture. Brain Behav Evol 73:295–303
MacNeilage P, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2009) Origins of the left and right brain. Sci Am 301:60–67
Mandel JT, Ratcliffe JM, Cersale DJ, Winkler DW (2008) Laterality and flight: concurrent tests of side-bias and optimality in flying tree swallows. PLoS ONE 3(3):e1748
Margat M, Brown C (2009) Laterality enhances cognition in Australian parrots. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4155–4162
Martin GR (1985) Eye. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds, vol 3. Academic, London, pp 311–371
Martin GR (2009) What is binocular vision for? A birds’ eye view. J Vis 9:1–19
Martin GR (2011) Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis 153:239–254
McGilchrist I (2009) The master and his emissary. Yale University Press, New Haven
McKenzie R, Andrew RJ, Jones RB (1998) Lateralization in chicks and hens: new evidence of control of response by the right eye system. Neuropsychologia 36:51–58
Mehlhorn J, Haastert B, Rehkämper G (2010) Asymmetry of different brain structures in homing pigeons with and without navigational experience. J Exp Biol 213:2219–2224
Mench JA, Andrew RJ (1986) Lateralization of a food search task in the domestic chick. Behav Neural Biol 46:107–114
Miklósi A, Andrew RJ, Dharmaretnam M (1996) Auditory lateralisation: shifts in ear use during attachment in the domestic chick. Laterality 1:215–224
Parsons CH, Rogers LJ (1993) Role of the tectal and posterior commissures in lateralization in the avian brain. Behav Brain Res 54:153–164
Peirce JW, Leigh AE, Kendrick KM (2000) Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia 38:475–483
Robins A, Rogers LJ (2004) Lateralised prey catching responses in the toad (Bufo marinus): analysis of complex visual stimuli. Anim Behav 68:567–575
Robins R, Rogers LJ (2006) Lateralized visual and motor responses in the green tree frog (Litoria caerulea). Anim Behav 72:843–852
Robins A, Lippolis G, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (1998) Lateralization of agonistic responses and hind-limb use in toads. Anim Behav 56:875–881
Rogers LJ (1980) Lateralisation in the avian brain. Bird Behav 2:1–12
Rogers LJ (1982) Light experience and asymmetry of brain function in chickens. Nature 297:223–225
Rogers LJ (1990) Light input and the reversal of functional lateralization in the chicken brain. Behav Brain Res 38:211–221
Rogers LJ (1995) The development of brain and behaviour in the chicken. CAB International, Oxon
Rogers LJ (1997) Early experiential effects on laterality: research on chicks has relevance to other species. Laterality 2:199–219
Rogers LJ (2000) Evolution of hemispheric specialisation: advantages and disadvantages. Brain Lang 73:236–253
Rogers LJ (2002) Lateralization in vertebrates: its early evolution, general pattern and development. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt J, Snowdon C, Roper T (eds) Advances study behaviour, vol 31. Academic, San Diego, pp 107–162
Rogers LJ (2007) Lateralization in its many forms, and its evolution and development. In: Hopkins WD (ed) The evolution of hemispheric specialization in primates, special topics in primatology, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23–56
Rogers LJ (2008) Development and function of lateralization in the avian brain. Brain Res Bull 76:235–244
Rogers LJ (2010) Relevance of brain and behavioural lateralization to animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 127:1–11
Rogers LJ, Anson JM (1979) Lateralisation of function in the chicken fore-brain. Pharm Biochem Behav 10:679–686
Rogers LJ, Deng C (1999) Light experience and lateralization of the two visual pathways in the chick. Behav Brain Res 98:277–287
Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (2006) An eye for a predator: lateralization in birds, with particular reference to the Australian magpie. In: Malashichev YB, Deckel AW (eds) Behavioral and morphological asymmetries in vertebrates. Landes Bioscience, George Town, pp 47–57
Rogers LJ, Rajendra S (1993) Modulation of the development of light-initiated asymmetry in chick thalamofugal visual projections by oestradiol. Exp Brain Res 93:89–94
Rogers LJ, Sink HS (1988) Transient asymmetry in the projections of the rostral thalamus to the visual hyperstriatum of the chicken, and reversal of its direction by light exposure. Exp Brain Res 70:378–384
Rogers LJ, Workman L (1989) Light exposure during incubation affects competitive behaviour in domestic chicks. App Anim Behav Sci 23:187–198
Rogers LJ, Zappia JV, Bullock SP (1985) Testosterone and eye-brain asymmetry for copulation in chickens. Experientia 41:1447–1449
Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ, Burne THJ (1998) Light exposure of the embryo and development of behavioural lateralisation in chicks: I. Olfactory responses. Behav Brain Res 97:195–200
Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2004) Advantage of having a lateralized brain. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S420–S422
Rogers LJ, Munro U, Freire R, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (2008) Lateralized response of chicks to magnetic cues. Behav Brain Res 186:66–71
Rosa Salva O, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2007) Chicks discriminate human gaze with their right hemisphere. Behav Brain Res 177:15–21
Rosa Salva O, Daisley JN, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2009) Lateralization of social learning in the domestic chick, Gallus gallus domesticus: learning to avoid. Anim Behav 78:847–856
Rosa Salva O, Daisley JN, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2010) Time-dependent lateralization of social learning in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus domesticus): effects of retention delays in the observed lateralized patter. Behav Brain Res 212:152–158
Schaeffel H, Howard HC (1987) Corneal accommodation in chick and pigeon. J Comp Physiol 160:375–384
Schwabl H (1993) Yolk is a source of maternal testosterone for developing birds. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 90:11446–11450
Schwabl H (1999) Developmental changes and among-sibling variation of corticosterone levels in an altricial avian species. Gen Comp Endocrinol 116:403–408
Schwarz IM, Rogers LJ (1992) Testosterone: a role in the development of brain asymmetry in the chick. Neurosci Lett 146:167–170
Templeton JJ, Christensen-Dykema JM (2008) A behavioural analysis of prey detection lateralization and unilateral transfer in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Behav Process 79:125–131
Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Clarendon, Oxford
Tucker VA, Tucker AE, Akers K, Enderson JH (2000) Curved flight paths and sideways vision in peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus). J Exp Biol 203:3755–3763
Valenci-Alfonso C-E, Verhaal J, Güntürkün O (2009) Ascending and descending mechanisms of visual lateralization in pigeons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:955–963
Valenti A, Sovrano VA, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2003) Visual lateralisation in quails (Coturnix coturnix). Laterality 8:67–78
Vallortigara G (1992) Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick. Neuropsychologia 9:761–768
Vallortigara G (2000) Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through left and right animals’ perceptual worlds. Brain Lang 73:189–219
Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1991) Lateralization of response to a change in a model partner by chicks. Anim Behav 41:187–194
Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1994a) Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick. Behav Process 33:41–58
Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1994b) Olfactory lateralization in the chick. Neuropsychologia 32:417–423
Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28:575–633
Vallortigara G, Cozzutti C, Tommasi L, Rogers LJ (2001) How birds use their eyes? Opposite left-right specialisation for the lateral and frontal visual hemifield in the domestic chick. Curr Biol 11:29–33
Ventolini N, Ferrero EA, Sponza S, Chiesa AD, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2005) Laterality in the wild: preferential hemifield use during predatory and sexual behaviour in the black-winged stilt. Anim Behav 69:1077–1084
Wichman A, Freire R, Rogers LJ (2009) Light exposure during incubation and social and vigilance behaviour in domestic chicks. Laterality 14:381–394
Workman L, Andrew RJ (1986) Asymmetries of eye use in birds. Anim Behav 38:1582–1584
Workman L, Andrew RJ (1991) Population lateralization in zebra finch courtship: an unresolved issue. Anim Behav 41:545–546
Zappia JV, Rogers LJ (1983) Light experience during development affects asymmetry of fore-brain function in chickens. Dev Brain Res 11:93–106
Acknowledgments
I am most grateful to the Organising Committee of the International Ornithological Conference for the opportunity to present this paper at the meeting in Brazil in 2010. My own research cited in this review was conducted in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (NHMRC 2004). I am grateful to Prof. Gisela Kaplan for comments on the manuscript and translating the Abstract into German.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by John Wingfield.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, L.J. The two hemispheres of the avian brain: their differing roles in perceptual processing and the expression of behavior. J Ornithol 153 (Suppl 1), 61–74 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0769-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0769-z