Abstract
A method for allocating allowable ranges of total nitrogen (TN) load to nonpoint (diffuse pollution) sources in a watershed has been developed by adopting the two-phase grey fuzzy optimization approach. Competing goals of water quality management authorities and TN load dischargers at nonpoint sources such as paddy field, upland crop field, and residential area are described with linear imprecise membership functions including interval numbers. TN load discharged from each cell of the nonpoint sources is assumed to be transported along with surface, subsurface, and river flow under the conventional first-order kinetic removal with respect to distance. The travel length of the load is estimated with a digital elevation model in a geographic information system (GIS). Uncertainty of river discharge and self-purification coefficients appearing in the TN transport model is also expressed with interval numbers. The GIS-aided grey fuzzy optimization model developed here is applied to the Seimei River watershed, Japan. By solving the optimization model, the allowable load represented by an interval number at each cell is procured, which would be a scientific base for effluent control regarding nonpoint sources in the area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2006) Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 42:W10429. doi:10.1029/2006WR004931
Chang NB, Chen HW, Shaw DG, Yang CH (1997) Water pollution control in river basin by interactive fuzzy interval multiobjective programming. J Environ Eng 123(12):1208–1216
Chen L, Qiu J, Wei G, Shen Z (2015) A preference-based multi-objective model for the optimization of best management practices. J Hydrol 520:356–366
Fujita K, Ito H, Oro T, Anma T (2006) A study on evaluation of water environment policy through watershed-scale hydrological & material cycle simulation models to Kasumigaura Lake and its watershed. Project research report of national institute for land and infrastructure management, “Watershed/urban regeneration in accord with nature” technical report (II), pp 3–8 (in Japanese)
Ha SR, Jung DI, Yoon CH (1998) A renovated model for spatial analysis of pollutant runoff loads in agricultural watershed. Water Sci Technol 38(10):207–214
Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995) Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 83:594–620
Ibaraki Prefecture (2015) White Paper on Environment. Ibaraki Prefecture, p 60 (in Japanese)
Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture (2012) The Sixth Plan for Water Quality Conservation in Lake Kasumigaura. Ibaraki Prefecture, p 4 (in Japanese)
Karmakar S, Mujumdar PP (2006) Grey fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system. Adv Water Resour 29(7):1088–1105
Karmakar S, Mujumdar PP (2007) A two-phase grey fuzzy optimization approach for water quality management of a river system. Adv Water Resour 30:1218–1235
King AJ, Rockafellar RT, Somlyódy L, Wets RJ-B (1988) Lake eutrophication management: the Lake Balaton project. In: Ermoliev Y, Wets RJ-B (eds) Numerical techniques for stochastic optimization. Springer, Berlin, pp 435–444
Kumar A, Maeda S, Kawachi T (2002) Multiobjective optimization of discharged pollutant loads from non-point sources in watershed. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 215:117–124
Li Z, Huang G, Zhang Y, Li Y (2013) Inexact two-stage stochastic credibility constrained programming for water quality management. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:122–132
Li T, Li P, Chen B, Hu M, Zhang X (2014) Simulation-based inexact two-stage chance-constraint quadratic programming for sustainable water quality management under dual uncertainties. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(3):298–312
Liu R, Zhang P, Wang X, Chen Y, Shen Z (2013) Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed. Agric Water Manag 117:9–18
Maeda S, Kawachi T, Zhang Q (2006) Grid-based optimization model for allocating allowable discharged total nitrogen to point and nonpoint sources in watershed. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 242:1–7
Maeda S, Kawachi T, Unami K, Takeuchi J (2009a) Optimal allocations of maximum allowable load among influent rivers: an application for strategic management of lake water quality. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 264:1–7
Maeda S, Kawachi T, Unami K, Takeuchi J, Izumi T, Chono S (2009b) Fuzzy optimization model for integrated management of total nitrogen loads from distributed point and nonpoint sources in watershed. Paddy Water Environ 7:163–175
Maeda S, Kawachi T, Unami K, Takeuchi J, Ichion E (2010a) Controlling wasteloads from point and nonpoint sources to river system by GIS-aided epsilon robust optimization model. J Hydro environ Res 4(1):27–36
Maeda S, Yoshikawa K, Takeuchi J, Kawachi T, Chono S, Unami K (2010b) Optimal allocation of maximum allowable discharged total nitrogen load among field plots in agricultural watershed. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 265:23–31
Martínez A, Rodríguez C, Vázquez-Méndez ME (2000) A control problem arising in the process of waste water purification. J Comput Appl Math 114:67–79
Nie XH, Huang GH, Wang D, Li HL (2008) Robust optimization for inexact water quality management under uncertainty. Civil Eng Environ Syst 25(2):167–184
Sasikumar K, Mujumdar PP (1998) Fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 124(2):79–88
Skop E, Sørensen PB (1998) GIS-based modelling of solute fluxes at the catchment scale: a case study of the agricultural contribution to the riverine nitrogen loading in the Vejle Fjord catchment, Denmark. Ecol Model 106:291–310
Tabuchi T, Takamura Y (1985) Outflow of nitrogen and phosphorus from watershed. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, p 32 (in Japanese)
Wagner JM, Shamir U, Nemati HR (1992) Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: stochastic programming approaches and the value of information. Water Resour Res 28(5):1233–1246
Watkins DW, McKinney DC (1997) Finding robust solutions to water resources problems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123(1):49–58
Zhang X, Huang GH, Nie X (2009) Optimal decision schemes for agricultural water quality management planning with imprecise objective. Agric Water Manag 96:1723–1731
Zhang X, Huang GH, Nie X (2011) Possibilistic stochastic water management model for agricultural nonpoint source pollution. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(1):101–112
Zhang JL, Li YP, Wang CX, Huang GH (2015) An inexact simulation-based stochastic optimization method for identifying effluent trading strategies of agricultural nonpoint sources. Agric Water Manag 152:72–90
Zimmermann H-J (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:45–55
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported in part by the River Maintenance Fund of River Foundation Grant Number 25-1211-006. The authors acknowledge anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The formulation of eight submodels for the grey fuzzy optimization model [Eqs. (6)–(13)] is shown here.
Case 1
Submodels 1 and 2 are formulated and successively solved in Phases 1 and 2, respectively, to produce the upper limit of \(\xi^{ + }\) with optimal \(L_{ji}^{ - }\).
<Phase 1>
Submodel 1:
subject to
Submodel 1 [Eqs. (16)–(22)] can be solved by the simplex method to procure \(L_{ji}^{ - }\). The obtained objective value of \(\xi^{ + }\) is defined as \(\xi_{1}^{ + }\). In the second phase, the smallest values of \(L_{ji}^{ - }\) are pursued with the overall satisfaction level kept at \(\xi_{1}^{ + }\) by solving the following optimization model.
<Phase 2>
Submodel 2:
subject to
It is noted that the difference between Submodel 1 [Eqs. (16)–(22)] and Submodel 2 [Eqs. (23)–(30)] is appearing in the objective function, Eq. (23), and the additional constraint, Eq. (24). By solving Submodel 2 just after solving Submodel 1, the solution of \(L_{ji}^{ - }\) in Case 1 where the goal of water quality management authorities is prioritized is finally procured.
Next, Submodels 3 and 4 are provided and successively solved in Phases 1 and 2, respectively, to produce the lower limit of \(\xi^{ - }\) with optimal \(L_{ji}^{ + }\).
<Phase 1>
Submodel 3:
subject to
It is noted that the solution of Submodel 2, \(L_{ji}^{ - } = \hat{L}_{ji}^{ - }\), is set as the lower limit of \(L_{ji}^{ + }\) in Eq. (36).
<Phase 2>
Submodel 4:
subject to
where \(\xi_{2}^{ - }\) in Eq. (40) is the overall satisfaction level obtained in Phase 1, i.e., Submodel 3. Solving Submodel 4 [Eqs. (39)–(47)] results in obtaining the final solution of \(L_{ji}^{ + }\).
Case 2
Submodels 5 and 6 described below are first formulated and successively solved in Phases 1 and 2, respectively, to produce the upper limit of \(\xi^{ + }\) with optimal \(L_{ji}^{ + }\).
<Phase 1>
Submodel 5:
subject to
Submodel 5 [Eqs. (48)–(54)] is solved to procure \(L_{ji}^{ + }\). The obtained objective value of \(\xi^{ + }\) is specified as \(\xi_{3}^{ + }\). In the second phase, the smallest values of \(L_{ji}^{ + }\) are pursued with the overall satisfaction level kept at \(\xi_{3}^{ + }\) by solving the following optimization model.
<Phase 2>
Submodel 6:
subject to
By solving Submodel 6 [Eqs. (55)–(62)] just after solving Submodel 5, the final solution of \(L_{ji}^{ + }\) in the case that the goals of dischargers are prioritized is procured.
Then, Submodels 7 and 8 are created and successively solved in Phases 1 and 2, respectively, to produce the lower limit of \(\xi^{ - }\).
<Phase 1>
Submodel 7:
subject to
It is noted that the solution of Submodel 6, \(L_{ji}^{ + } = \hat{L}_{ji}^{ + }\), is set as the upper limit of \(L_{ji}^{ - }\) in Eq. (68).
<Phase 2>
Submodel 8:
subject to
where \(\xi_{4}^{ - }\) in Eq. (72) is the overall satisfaction level obtained in Phase 1, i.e., Submodel 7. Solving Submodel 8 [Eqs. (71)–(79)] leads to obtaining the final solution of \(L_{ji}^{ - }\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maeda, S., Kuroda, H., Yoshida, K. et al. A GIS-aided two-phase grey fuzzy optimization model for nonpoint source pollution control in a small watershed. Paddy Water Environ 15, 263–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0545-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0545-z