Abstract
Aim
The international literature rarely concerns itself with the refusal of treatment. We have studied the adaptation and subconscious defence mechanisms triggered in patients at the time of proposing adjuvant chemotherapy after cancer surgery.
Materials and methods
This longitudinal clinical study based on 50 breast cancer patients compares the psychological factors involved in the making of decisions following oncological consultation.
Results
Eighty-two percent of patients accepted chemotherapy while 18% refused it. The Accepting group usually exhibits depression in its reaction whereas the Refusing group generally has more hostile traits. Anxiety, significantly higher in the Accepting group than in the Refusing group, seems to be linked to feelings that are repressed by the patient that submits to the medical advice. Conversely, patients refusing the treatment tend to exhibit their hostility towards doctors and medicine verbally.
Conclusion
Changes in doctor- patient communication, coupled with a greater knowledge of the personality of patients, may help encourage patients to accept the treatment offered to them.
Résumé
Objectifs
La littérature internationale s’intéresse rarement au refus du traitement. Nous avons exploré l’adaptation et les défenses inconscientes de patientes lors de la proposition d’une chimiothérapie adjuvante après chirurgie curative de leur cancer.
Matériel et méthodes
Cette étude clinique longitudinale compare les facteurs psychologiques dans la prise de décision, en consultation avec l’oncologue, de 50 patientes suivies pour un cancer du sein.
Résultats
Quatre-vingt-deux pour cent des patientes ont accepté la chimiothérapie adjuvante et 18 % l’ont refusée. Le groupe Adhésion manifeste surtout une réaction dépressive, alors que dans le groupe Refus, prédominent les traits de personnalité hostiles. L’anxiété, significativement plus élevée dans le groupe Adhésion que dans le groupe Refus, semble liée à la répression des émotions des malades qui se soumettent à la proposition médicale. Les patientes qui refusent le traitement expriment, au contraire, verbalement leurs émotions hostiles à l’égard des médecins et de la médecine.
Conclusion
L’adaptation des modes de communication du médecin, et la connaissance plus approfondie des traits de personnalité des patients pourraient faciliter le niveau de participation des patients à leur protocole thérapeutique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Références
Altschuler A, Somkin C (2005) Women’s decision-making about whether or not to use breast cancer chemoprevention. Women Health 41(2): 81–95
Bacqué MF (2011) Médecines parallèles: un révélateur de la relation médecin-malade. Psycho-Oncologie 5: 149–151
Bastian LA, Lipkus IM, Kuchibhatla MN, et al. (2001) Women’s interest in chemoprevention for breast cancer. Arch Intern Rimer Med 161(13): 1639–1644
Bion WR (1983) Une théorie de l’activité de pensée. Réflexion faite, PUF, Paris
Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB (1990) Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient charasteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer 65: 186–192
Bober SL, Hoke LA, Duda RB, et al. (2004) Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors. J Clin Oncol 22(24): 4951–4957
Bonneterre J (2007) Cancéroguide. Margaux orange, Paris
Brown RF, Butow PN, Juraskava I, et al. (2010) Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the decision analysis system for oncology to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations. Health expect
Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Quintard B (2001) Personnalités et maladies. Stress, coping et ajustement. Dunod, Paris
Casagrande T (2004) Le respect du rapport benefice/risque versus la volonté du patient: que dit la loi ? Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncol 4: 180–181
Charavel M (2004) Participation au choix thérapeutique en oncologie. Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncol 3(4): 201–205
Colleoni M, Mandala M, Peruzzotti G, et al. (2000) Depression and degree of acceptance of adjuvant cytotoxic drugs. Lancet 356: 1326–1327
Cotton T, Locker AP, Jackson L, et al. (1991) A prospective study of patient choice in treatment for primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 17: 115–117
Dalton SO, Laursen TM, Ross L, et al. (2009) Risk for hospitalization with depression after a cancer diagnosis: a nationwide, population-based study of cancer patients in Denmark from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol 27: 1440–1445
Daly MB, Lerman CL, Ross E, et al. (1996) Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior. Breast Cancer Res Treat 41: 59–70
Dash KB, Lerman CL, Cohen H, et al. (2010) Affective differenciation in breast cancer patients. J Behav Med 33(6): 441–453
Despres C (2012) Le renoncement aux soins pour raisons financières, analyse socio-anthropologique. DREES, 119
Dodwell DJ (1998) Adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for early breast cancer: doubts and decisions. Lancet 351(9114): 1506–1507
Duric VM, Stocker M (2001) Patient’s preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a review makes it worthwile? Lancet Oncol 2: 691–697
Edery L, Bacqué MF (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Do you agree or not? Patients decision making factors. Psycho-Oncology 19(Suppl 2): 1–313, 31
Edery L, Bacqué MF (2009) The multidisciplinary therapeutic decision and the mentalization of the choice of the treatment of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 18(Suppl 2): S1–S330, S13
Fischer GN (2002) Traité de psychologie de la santé. Dunod, Paris
Gattelari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2002) When the treatment is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 20: 503–513
Harter M, Baumeister H, Reuter K, et al. (2007) Increased 12 month prevalence rates of mental disorders in patients with chronic somatic diseases. Psychother Psychosom 76: 354–360
Honda K, Goodwin RD (2004) Cancer and mental disorders in a national community sample: findings from the comorbidity survey. Psychother Psychosom 73: 235–242
Jansen SJT, Otten W, Stiggelbout AM (2006) Factors affecting patient’s perception of choice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99: 35–45
Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, et al. (2002) Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 20: 1473–1479
Königsberg RD (2011) Time Magazine, pp. 7–10
Lambrichs LL (2011) Le livre de Pierre. Psychisme et cancer. Seuil, Paris
Llewellyn-Thomas HA (1997) Investigating patients’ preferences for different treatment options. Can J Nurs Res 29: 45–64
Lindley C, Vasa S, Sawyer WT, Winer EP (1996) Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 1380–1387
Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, et al. (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interviewbased studies. Lancet Oncol 12(2): 160–174
Moumjid N, Carrère MO, Charavel M (2003) Clinical issues in shared decisionmaking applied to breast cancer. Health Expect 6: 222–227
Phipps LL, Cuthill JD (2002) Breaking bad news: a clinician’s view of literature. Ann R Coll Physicians Sup Can 35(5):287–293
Pedersen AE, Sawatzy JA, Hack TF (2010) The sequelae of anxiety in breast cancer: a human response to illness model. Oncol Nurs Forum 37(4): 469–475
Protière C, Moatti JP, Maraninchi D, Viens P (1998) Choix et révélation des préférences, vers le partage de la décision thérapeutique en cancérologie: de la théorie économique à la pratique. Bull Cancer 85: 173–179
Protière C, Viens P, Genre D, et al. (2000) Patient participation in medical decisionmaking: a French study in adjuvant radiochemotherapy for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 11: 39–45
Pucheu S, Consoli SM, Landi B, Lecomte T (2005) Personnalité, représentations et adaptation à la maladie cancéreuse: étude comparative. Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncol 4: 268–277
Prieto JM, Blanch J, Atala J, et al. (2002) Psychiatric morbidity and impact on hospital length of stay among hematologic cancer patients receiving stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 20: 1907–1917
Radvin PM (1998) Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 16: 515–521
Razavi D, Delvaux N (2002) Interventions psycho-oncologiques: la prise en charge du patient cancéreux. Masson, Paris
Schaeffer J (1997) Le refus du féminin. PUF, Paris
Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, et al. (1990) Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. Br Ed J 300: 1458–1460
Simes RJ, Coates AS (2001) Patient preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: how much benefit is needed? J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 30:146–152
Stark DP, Kieley M, Smith A, et al. (2002) Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: Their nature, associations and relation to quality of life. J Clin Oncol 20: 3137–3148
Surbon A (2001) Ethical implications of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 40(2): 149–157
Vennin P, Hecquet B, Marcuzzi I, Demaille MC (1995) Cancer du sein: l’information en question(s). Enquête auprès des patients et des médecins d’un centre de lutte contre le cancer. Bull Cancer, Paris
Zimmerman C, Baldoc C, Molino A (2000) Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: breast cancer patient’s choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60: 9–14
Référence électronique
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Edery, L., Bacqué, M.F. Faut-il être fou pour refuser sa chimiothérapie ?. Oncologie 15, 20–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-013-2246-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-013-2246-6
Keywords
- Mental adaptive strategies in treatment advice
- Medical information on adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
- Doctor
- patient relations
- Risk-benefit relationship