Skip to main content
Log in

A brain–computer interface for the Dasher alternative text entry system

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate whether the alternative text entry system, Dasher, is useful to physically and intellectually disabled students when controlled by a brain–computer interface (BCI) a new software tool was developed to allow subjects to type words onto a computer screen via Dasher using their thoughts. A case study approach was adopted. Subjects were selected based on their suitability for the experiment, and the potential benefit to them of this system, by their head teacher. Subjects entered literacy level-matched phrases onto a computer using QWERTY keyboard, Dasher-mouse and Dasher-BCI. A researcher recorded qualitative and quantitative data, including characters entered per minute and their system preferences. Informed written consent was given for seven subjects to participate (aged 14–19 years, five male, with a range of physical and intellectual disabilities). After a short training period, all subjects had some degree of control over the Dasher-BCI system. With regard to typing speed, Dasher-BCI performed relatively poorly (3.9 ± 1.5 characters per minute), and QWERTY keyboard performed the best (31.9 ± 21.9 characters per minute). Dasher-BCI was the most preferred method. Areas of weakness in Dasher and the BCI hardware were highlighted and suggestions for improvement given. BCI-based text entry is not yet ready to compete with more established methods for students with combined cognitive and physical disabilities. Although underpowered, this study suggests that for people whose predominant disability is physical (cerebral palsy), BCI technology shows great potential as a viable text entry alternative. Suggestions for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abou-Khalil, B., Musilus, K.E.: Atlas of EEG & Seizure Seminology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

  2. AEGIS: AEGIS project objectives. http://www.aegis-project.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=22 (2008). Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  3. Barry, W., Jones, G.M.: Influence of eyelid movement upon electro-oculographic recording of vertical eye movements. Aerosp. Med. 36, 855–858 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blankertz, B., et al.: A note on brain actuated spelling with the Berlin brain–computer interface. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4557, 759–768 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobrov, P., et al.: Brain–computer interface based on generation of visual images. PLoS ONE 6(e20674), 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, D.J., et al.: Designing location based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Comput. Educ. 56, 11–20 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, D.J., Ley, J., Evett, L., Standen, P.J.: Can participating in games based learning improve mathematic skills in students with intellectual disabilities? IEEE 1st international conference on serious games and applications for health (seGAH) (2011)

  8. Brown, D.J., Ley, J., Evett, L., Standen, P.J.: IEEE 1st international conference on serious games and applications for health (seGAH). Can participating in games based learning improve mathematic skills in students with intellectual disabilities? (2011)

  9. Brown, D.J., Neale, H., Cobb, S.V., Reynolds, H.: The development and evaluation of the virtual city. Int. J. Virtual Real. 4, 28–41 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Varebeke, S.P., et al.: Fixation of cochlear implants: an evidence-based review of literature. B-ENT 8, 85–94 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Health: Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. The Stationary Office. HMSO, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Emotiv: EPOC neuroheadset. http://www.emotiv.com/apps/epoc/299/ (2013). Accessed 26 February 2013

  13. Farwell, L.A., Donchin, E.: Taking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70, 510–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Felton, E.A., et al.: (2007) International IEEE EMBS conference on neural engineering, 3rd. 2–5 May, 2007. Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA. Neural signal based control of the Dasher writing system

  15. Felzer, T., Nordmann, R.: The international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, 8th. 22–25 October, 2006. Portland, OR, USA. Alternative text entry using different input methods (2006)

  16. Holzapfel, S., et al.: Behavioural psychophysiological intervention in a mentally retarded epileptic patient with brain lesion. Appl. Psychophysiol. Feedback 23, 189–202 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horovitz, S.G., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J.C.: Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20, 319–325 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iwasaki, M., et al.: Effects of eyelid closure, blinks, and eye movements on the electroencephalogram. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 878–885 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lanyi, C.S., et al.: User interface evaluation of serious games for students with intellectual disability. Comput. Help. People Spec. Needs 6179, 227–234 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laufs, H., et al.: EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. NeuroImage 19, 1463–1476 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, J.D., Wu, J.L., Yen, C.F.: An exploratory study into health care policy for persons with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 48, 252–261 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lins, O.G., Picton, T.W., Berg, P., Scherg, M.: Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials I: scalp topography. Brain Topogr. 6, 51–63 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacKay, D.J.C.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms, p. 119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

  24. Nunez, P.L., Srinivasan, R.: Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1981)

  25. Pfurtscheller, G., Lopes da Silva, F.H.: Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842–1857 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinheiro, C.G., et al.: Alternative communication systems for people with severe motor disabilities: a survey. Biomed. Eng. Online 10(31). http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/10/1/31 (2011). Accessed 7 Nov 2011

  27. Regents of the University of California (2013) MURI: imagined speech and intended direction. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/index.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  28. Standen, P.J., Brown, D.J.: The use of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of people with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 272–282 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Standen, P.J., et al.: An evaluation of the use of a computer game in improving the choice reaction time of adults with intellectual disabilities. J. Assist. Technol. 3, 4–11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Standen, P.J., et al.: An evaluation of the Wii Nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Comput. Educ. 56, 2–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Standen, P.J., et al.: An evaluation of the Wii Nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Comput. Educ. 56, 2–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Standen, P.J., Rees, F., Brown, D.J.: Effect of playing computer games on decision making in people with intellectual disabilities. J. Assist. Technol. 3, 6–15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stytsenko, K., Jablonskis, E., Prahm. C: MEi:CogSci conference, 5th. 17–18 June, 2011. Ljubljana, Slovenia. Evaluation of consumer EEG device Emotiv EPOC (2011)

  34. Tobii: Tobii technology. http://www.tobii.com/ (2013). Accessed 26 February 2013

  35. Tomlinson, J.: Inclusive learning: the report of the committee of enquiry into the post-school education of those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, in England 1996. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 12, 184–196 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. UK National Archives: Equality act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents (2010). Accessed 26 Feb 2013

  37. Ward, D.J., Blackwell, A.F., MacKay, J.C.: UIST 2000: the 13th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. Dasher—a data entry interface using continuous gestures and language models (2000)

  38. Welton, T.: Dasher-BCI—Google Project Hosting. http://code.google.com/p/dasherbci/ (2012). Accessed 26 February 2013

  39. Wills, S.A., MacKay, D.J.C.: Dasher—an efficient writing system for brain–computer interfaces? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14, 244–246 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolpaw, J.R., et al.: Brain–computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8, 164–173 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the AEGIS Project (IST-224348), Open Accessibility Everywhere: Groundwork, Infrastructure, Standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welton, T., Brown, D.J., Evett, L. et al. A brain–computer interface for the Dasher alternative text entry system. Univ Access Inf Soc 15, 77–83 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0375-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0375-y

Keywords

Navigation