Skip to main content
Log in

Come play with me: designing technologies for intergenerational play

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite research showing that interaction between the elderly and young people is beneficial to the health and well-being of both, little is known about the grandparent–grandchild relationship. Consequently, it is difficult to make informed design decisions about technologies to support their intergenerational interactions. This paper investigates one particularly important type of intergenerational interaction, namely play. The paper presents research that examines grandparent–grandchildren interactions in preschool playgroups. Through the use of vignettes drawn from observation of playful activity, pertinent features of intergenerational play are identified, focussing on the roles grandparents and grandchildren use when playing together. The results are relevant to researchers wishing to understand intergenerational play and to technology designers wanting to support it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angersbach, H.L., Jones-Forster, S.: Intergenerational interactions: a descriptive analysis of elder–child interactions in a campus-based child care center. Child Youth Serv. 20(1/2), 117–128 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beland, R., Mills, T.: Positive portrayal of grandparents in current children’s literature. J. Fam. Issues 22(5), 639–651 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Billington, K.: Creating a steiner playgroup. Available from http://www.steiner-australia.org/other/playgroup.html (1999). Cited 2009 June

  4. Blau, T.H.: An evaluative study of the role of the grandparent in the best interests of the child. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 12(4), 46–47 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. British National Toy Council: Intergenerational play. Available from http://www.btha.co.uk/pdfs/intergenerational_play.pdf. Cited 2009 June

  6. Burdick, D., Kwon, S. (eds.): Gerotechnology: Research and Practice in Technology and Aging. Springer, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll, J.M., Convertino, G., Farooq, U., Rosson, M.B.: The firekeepers: aging considered as a resource. Univ Access Inf Soc. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0229-9

  8. Dautenhahn, K., Werry, I.: Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Robotica 21, 1–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, H., Vetere, F., Francis, P., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: “I wish we could get together”: exploring intergenerational play across a distance via a ‘magic box’. J. Intergenerat. Relationships 6(2), 191–210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Koven, B.: Intergenerational games. Available from http://www.deepfun.com/pwc.htm (2006). Cited 2009 June

  11. Dellmann-Jenkins, M.: An intergenerational perspective on grandparent roles: views of young parents and middle-age/older adults. J. Intergenerat. Relationships 3(1), 35–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Druin, A.: The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inform. Technol. 21(1), 1–25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fitzpatrick, G., Stringer, M.: Exploring technology influences between home, work and school: implications for managing ubiquitous technologies in the home. Proceedings of HOIT 2007, Chennai, Aug 2007. In: HOIT, Chennai, India (2007)

  14. Goelman, H., Jacobs, E.V. (eds.): Children’s Play in Child Care Settings. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griff, M.D.: Intergenerational play therapy: the influence of grandparents in family systems. Child Youth Serv. 20(1–2), 63–76 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harley, D., Fitzpatrick, G.: YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 8(1), 5–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderback, B., Lindquist, S., Sundblad, Y.: Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In: CHI 2003, Ft Laurerdale, Florida, USA (2003)

  18. Kern, D., Stringer, M., Fitzpatrick, G., Schmidt, A.: Cur-ball a prototype ubigame for older people. Available from http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/interact/projects/Equator/curball.htm (2005). Cited 2009 June

  19. Khoo, E.T., Lee, S.P., Cheok, A.D., Kodagoda, S., Zhou, Y., Toh, G.S.: Age invaders: social and physical inter-generational family entertainment. In: CHI ‘06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, Montréal, QC (2006)

  20. King, V., Elder, G.H.: The legacy of grandparenting: childhood experiences with grandparents and current involvement with grandchildren. J. Marr. Fam. 59(4), 848–859 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuehne, V.: “Younger friends/older friends” a study of intergenerational interactions. J. Classroom Interact. 24(1), 14–21 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction—Volume 1. British Computer Society, Liverpool, UK (2008)

  23. Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Boston, MA, USA (2009)

  24. Mathur, A.: Adoption of technological innovations by the elderly: a consumer socialization perspective. J. Market. Manage. 9(3), 21–35 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyajima, A., Itoh, Y., Itoh, M., Watanabe, T.: “Tsunagari-kan” communication: design of a new telecommunication environment and a field test with family members living apart. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(2), 253–276 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., Jacobs, A.: Digital family portraits: providing peace of mind for extended family members. In: CHI 2001. ACM Press, Seattle, WA (2001)

  27. Newman, S., Ward, C.: An observational study of intergenerational activities and behavior change in dementing elders at adult day care centres. Int. Aging Hum. Dev. 36(4), 253–265 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pardo, S., Vetere, F., Howard, S.: Teacher’s involvement in usability testing with children. In: Interaction Design and Children, Tampere, pp. 89–92. Tampere, Finland (2006)

  29. Piaget, J.: Play. dreams and imitation in childhood, Routledge, London (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A.: Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 13(3), 313–346 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roschelle, J.M., Pea, R.D., Hoadley, C.M., Gordin, D.N., Means, B.M.: Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Future Child. 10(2), 76–101 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (eds.): Grounded Theory in Practice. Sage Publications, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Francis, P., Howard, S.: A magic box for understanding intergenerational play. In: CHI 2006, Montreal, Canada (2006)

  34. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: The magic box and collage: responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(2), 165–178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Voida, A., Greenberg, S.: Wii all play: the console game as a computational meeting place. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Boston, MA, USA (2009)

  36. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind In Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ward, C.R.: The intergenerational field needs more ethnographic research. Child Youth Serv. 20(1/2), 7–23 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: The value of the novel designing for experience. In: Pirhonen, A., Roast, C., Saariluoma, P., Isom, H. (eds.) Future Interaction Design, pp. 9–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

  39. Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence, Italy (2008)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members of the intergenerational playgroups, both young and young at heart, for allowing us to observe them at play. We would also like to acknowledge the support of Grandparents Victoria and Smart Internet Technologies CRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Vetere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, H., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. et al. Come play with me: designing technologies for intergenerational play. Univ Access Inf Soc 11, 17–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0230-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0230-3

Keywords

Navigation