Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous lifetime, accidental bequests and economic growth

  • Published:
Decisions in Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of unintentional bequests in a closed economy à la Chakraborty (J Econ Theory 116:119–137, 2004) with overlapping generations. We show that scarce public investments in health can lead to poverty traps depending on the relative size of the output elasticity of capital. More importantly, the existence of unintentional bequests, rather than a market for annuities, means that health tax rates play a prominent role in determining the stability of the long-term equilibrium in rich economies. In fact, Neimark–Sacker bifurcations and endogenous fluctuations occur depending on the size of the public health system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As an example, think of the provision of public pensions, which are mainly organised on a pay-as-you-go basis in several European countries: i.e. the income of current workers is taxed by the government to finance the benefits received by the current pensioners (see Fanti and Gori 2012a). There are extensive debates between economists to find appropriate ways to reform the social security system (e.g. Boeri et al. 2001, 2002; Cigno 2007; Cigno and Werding 2007) because of concerns regarding population ageing.

  2. Other major bequest motives are altruism and exchange. While there is no consensus on which motive dominates (see, e.g. Altonji et al. 1997), Hurd (1997) argues that bequests are largely accidental.

  3. Note that, unlike Chakraborty (2004), our model is developed by assuming unintentional bequests without a market for annuities.

  4. This can indeed be assumed in a context of exogenous fertility. Things would be different if fertility was endogenous.

  5. See, e.g. Abel (1985); Chakraborty (2004); Chakraborty and Das (2005); Pestieau et al. (2008); Chakraborty et al. (2010); Fanti and Gori (2012b) for similar formulations of expected utility functions.

  6. Every annuitant deposits his/her savings with a mutual fund. Savings are then invested by the fund to get a return factor (independent of longevity). Then: (i) if an annuitant is alive, he/she gets savings plus the return factor divided by the longevity rate; (ii) if an annuitant dies at the onset of old age, the contract with the fund ends and his/her savings are distributed between all the survived annuitants. The situation is different with accidental bequests, as savings of deceased are directly bequeathed to his/her descendants.

  7. See Michel and de la Croix (2000) and de la Croix and Michel (2002) for a discussion about differences in dynamic outcomes under myopic foresight and perfect foresight in OLG growth models with capital accumulation and two-period lived individuals.

  8. This is shown by several numerical experiments not reported in the paper.

  9. If no eigenvalues of the linearised system around the fixed points of a first order discrete system lie on the unit circle, then such points are defined as being hyperbolic. Roughly speaking, at nonhyperbolic points topological features are not structurally stable.

  10. Since the map is difficult to handle in a neat analytical form, the local stability analysis of the positive (largest) steady state is performed through computations (no closed-form expression of the fixed point exists). With regard to local and global analyses, given that the dynamic patterns are characterised by a possible rich set of complex scenarios, our aim is to describe some interesting outcomes regarding dynamics with no claim of generalisation.

  11. Numerical experiments are of course available upon request.

  12. See Gollin (2002) for estimates on the output elasticity of capital in developed countries.

  13. When \(1/\left({1+\delta }\right)<\alpha <1\) and \(\delta >1\) both the low and high steady states in the model by Chakraborty (2004) are locally asymptotically stable with monotonic trajectories.

  14. For a map G defined on \(U\subset \mathfrak R ^{n}\), a subset \(S\subset U\) is said to be invariant if \(G^{n}(S)\subset S\) for any \(n\in Z\). This invariant set can be a closed (i.e. containing all its accumulation points) curve and like any other invariant set can be locally stable. We refer the reader to Lorenz (1993) or Medio (1995), amongst others, for more formal and rigorous definitions.

References

  • Abel, A.: Precautionary savings and accidental bequests. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(4), 777–791 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Altonji, J.G., Hayashi, F., Kotlikoff, L.J.: Parental altruism and inter vivos transfers: theory and evidence. J. Polit. Econ. 105(6), 1121–1166 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azariadis, C.: Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., Becker, G.S.: Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57(2), 481–501 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X.: Economic Growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S., Barro, R.J.: A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Q. J. Econ. 103(1), 1–25 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, J., Qiao, X.: Public and private expenditures on health in a growth model. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31(8), 2519–2535 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, K., Cipriani, G.P.: A model of longevity, fertility and growth. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 26(2), 187–204 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G.: Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Econ. Policy 16(32), 7–50 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G.: Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. Am. Econ. Rev. 92(2), 396–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunzel, H., Qiao, X.: Endogenous lifetime and economic growth revisited. Econ. Bull. 15(8), 1–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati, M., Sunde, U.: Human capital formation, life expectancy, and the process of development. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(5), 1653–1672 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati, M., Sunde, U.: Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. J. Econ. Growth 16(2), 99–133 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S.: Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. J. Econ. Theory 116(1), 119–137 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S., Das, M.: Mortality, human capital and persistent inequality. J. Econ. Growth 10(2), 159–192 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S., Papageorgiou, C., Pérez Sebastián, F.: Diseases, infection dynamics, and development. J. Monet. Econ. 57(7), 859–872 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno, A.: Low fertility in Europe: is the pension system the victim or the culprit? In: Europe and The Demographic Challenge. CESifo Forum 8(2007), 37–41 (2007)

  • Cigno, A., Werding, M.: Children and Pensions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., Doepke, M.: Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(4), 1091–1113 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., Doepke, M.: Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. J. Dev. Econ. 73(2), 607–629 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., Licandro, O.: Life expectancy and endogenous growth. Econ. Lett. 65(2), 255–263 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., Michel, P.: A Theory of Economic Growth. Dynamics and Policy in Overlapping Generations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., Ponthière, G.: On the golden rule of capital accumulation under endogenous longevity. Math. Soc. Sci. 59(2), 227–238 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A.: National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am. Econ. Rev. 55(5), 1126–1150 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Endogenous fertility, endogenous lifetime and economic growth: the role of child policies. MPRA Working Paper no. 26146, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26146/ (2010)

  • Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Fertility and PAYG pensions in the overlapping generations model. J. Popul. Econ. 25(3), 955–961 (2012a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Endogenous lifetime in an overlapping generations small open economy. FinanzArch/Public Finance Anal. 68(2), 1–32 (2012b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioroni, T.: Optimal savings and health spending over the life cycle. Eur. J. Health Econ. 11(4), 355–365 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R.W.: Economic growth, population theory and physiology: the bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(3), 369–395 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R.W.: The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O.: From stagnation to growth: unified growth theory. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth (Chap. 4). Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O.: Comparative economic development: insights from unified growth theory. Int. Econ. Rev. 51(1), 1–44 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., Moav, O.: Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 117(4), 1133–1191 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., Weil, D.N.: From malthusian stagnation to modern growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(2), 150–154 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., Weil, D.N.: Population, technology, and growth: from malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am. Econ. Rev. 90(4), 806–828 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin, D.: Getting income shares right. J. Polit. Econ. 110(2), 458–474 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golosov, M., Jones, L.E., Tertilt, M.: Efficiency with endogenous population growth. Econometrica 75(4), 1039–1071 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J.M., Pintus, P., de Vilder, R.: Capital-labor substitution and competitive nonlinear endogenous business cycles. J. Econ. Theory 80(1), 14–59 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R.G., Judd, K.L.: Social security and individual welfare: precautionary saving, borrowing constraints, and the payroll tax. Am. Econ. Rev. 77(4), 630–646 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, M.D.: The economics of individual aging. In: Rosenzweig, M., Stark, O. (eds.) Handbook of Population and Family Economics, pp. 891–966. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraay, A., Raddatz, C.: Poverty traps, aid, and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 82(2), 315–347 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, M.C.M., Wang, Y.: Endogenous health care, life expectancy and economic growth. Pacific Econ. Rev. 15(1), 11–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livi-Bacci, M.: A Concise History of World Population, Forth edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, H.W.: Nonlinear Dynamical Economics and Chaotic Motion. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, P., McMillan, J., Wacziarg, R.: Death and development. J Econ. Growth 13(2), 81–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen, P., Valkonen, T., Moustgaard, H.: The effect of individual taxable income, household taxable income and household disposable income on mortality in Finland, 1998–2004. Popul. Stud. 63(2), 147–162 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A.: Saving, economic growth, and demographic change. Popul. Dev. Rev. 14(1), 113–144 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medio, A.: Chaotic Dynamics: Theory and Applications to Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, P., de la Croix, D.: Myopic and perfect foresight in the OLG model. Econ. Lett. 67(1), 53–60 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moav, O.: Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Econ. J. 115(500), 88–110 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestieau, P., Ponthière, G., Sato, M.: Longevity, health spending and pay-as-you-go pensions. FinanzArch/Public Finance Anal. 64(1), 1–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varvarigos, D., Zakaria, I.Z.: Endogenous fertility in a growth model with public and private health expenditures. J Popul. Econ. 26(1), 67–85 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhang, J.: Social security, intergenerational transfers, and endogenous growth. Can. J. Econ. 31(5), 1225–1241 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Michael Kopel, Mauro Sodini, Piero Manfredi, Luigi Bonatti and participants at both the NED11 (Nonlinear Economic Dynamics) conference, held on 1 to 3 June 2011, at the Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Spain, and SIE 2011 (Società Italiana degli Economisti), held on 14–15 October, 2011, for stimulating discussions and valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier draft. The authors also acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Gori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanti, L., Gori, L. & Tramontana, F. Endogenous lifetime, accidental bequests and economic growth. Decisions Econ Finan 37, 81–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0138-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0138-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation