Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of unintentional bequests in a closed economy à la Chakraborty (J Econ Theory 116:119–137, 2004) with overlapping generations. We show that scarce public investments in health can lead to poverty traps depending on the relative size of the output elasticity of capital. More importantly, the existence of unintentional bequests, rather than a market for annuities, means that health tax rates play a prominent role in determining the stability of the long-term equilibrium in rich economies. In fact, Neimark–Sacker bifurcations and endogenous fluctuations occur depending on the size of the public health system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As an example, think of the provision of public pensions, which are mainly organised on a pay-as-you-go basis in several European countries: i.e. the income of current workers is taxed by the government to finance the benefits received by the current pensioners (see Fanti and Gori 2012a). There are extensive debates between economists to find appropriate ways to reform the social security system (e.g. Boeri et al. 2001, 2002; Cigno 2007; Cigno and Werding 2007) because of concerns regarding population ageing.
Note that, unlike Chakraborty (2004), our model is developed by assuming unintentional bequests without a market for annuities.
This can indeed be assumed in a context of exogenous fertility. Things would be different if fertility was endogenous.
Every annuitant deposits his/her savings with a mutual fund. Savings are then invested by the fund to get a return factor (independent of longevity). Then: (i) if an annuitant is alive, he/she gets savings plus the return factor divided by the longevity rate; (ii) if an annuitant dies at the onset of old age, the contract with the fund ends and his/her savings are distributed between all the survived annuitants. The situation is different with accidental bequests, as savings of deceased are directly bequeathed to his/her descendants.
This is shown by several numerical experiments not reported in the paper.
If no eigenvalues of the linearised system around the fixed points of a first order discrete system lie on the unit circle, then such points are defined as being hyperbolic. Roughly speaking, at nonhyperbolic points topological features are not structurally stable.
Since the map is difficult to handle in a neat analytical form, the local stability analysis of the positive (largest) steady state is performed through computations (no closed-form expression of the fixed point exists). With regard to local and global analyses, given that the dynamic patterns are characterised by a possible rich set of complex scenarios, our aim is to describe some interesting outcomes regarding dynamics with no claim of generalisation.
Numerical experiments are of course available upon request.
See Gollin (2002) for estimates on the output elasticity of capital in developed countries.
When \(1/\left({1+\delta }\right)<\alpha <1\) and \(\delta >1\) both the low and high steady states in the model by Chakraborty (2004) are locally asymptotically stable with monotonic trajectories.
For a map G defined on \(U\subset \mathfrak R ^{n}\), a subset \(S\subset U\) is said to be invariant if \(G^{n}(S)\subset S\) for any \(n\in Z\). This invariant set can be a closed (i.e. containing all its accumulation points) curve and like any other invariant set can be locally stable. We refer the reader to Lorenz (1993) or Medio (1995), amongst others, for more formal and rigorous definitions.
References
Abel, A.: Precautionary savings and accidental bequests. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(4), 777–791 (1985)
Altonji, J.G., Hayashi, F., Kotlikoff, L.J.: Parental altruism and inter vivos transfers: theory and evidence. J. Polit. Econ. 105(6), 1121–1166 (1997)
Azariadis, C.: Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)
Barro, R.J., Becker, G.S.: Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57(2), 481–501 (1989)
Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X.: Economic Growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Becker, G.S., Barro, R.J.: A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Q. J. Econ. 103(1), 1–25 (1988)
Bhattacharya, J., Qiao, X.: Public and private expenditures on health in a growth model. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31(8), 2519–2535 (2007)
Blackburn, K., Cipriani, G.P.: A model of longevity, fertility and growth. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 26(2), 187–204 (2002)
Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G.: Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Econ. Policy 16(32), 7–50 (2001)
Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G.: Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. Am. Econ. Rev. 92(2), 396–401 (2002)
Bunzel, H., Qiao, X.: Endogenous lifetime and economic growth revisited. Econ. Bull. 15(8), 1–8 (2005)
Cervellati, M., Sunde, U.: Human capital formation, life expectancy, and the process of development. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(5), 1653–1672 (2005)
Cervellati, M., Sunde, U.: Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. J. Econ. Growth 16(2), 99–133 (2011)
Chakraborty, S.: Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. J. Econ. Theory 116(1), 119–137 (2004)
Chakraborty, S., Das, M.: Mortality, human capital and persistent inequality. J. Econ. Growth 10(2), 159–192 (2005)
Chakraborty, S., Papageorgiou, C., Pérez Sebastián, F.: Diseases, infection dynamics, and development. J. Monet. Econ. 57(7), 859–872 (2010)
Cigno, A.: Low fertility in Europe: is the pension system the victim or the culprit? In: Europe and The Demographic Challenge. CESifo Forum 8(2007), 37–41 (2007)
Cigno, A., Werding, M.: Children and Pensions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)
de la Croix, D., Doepke, M.: Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(4), 1091–1113 (2003)
de la Croix, D., Doepke, M.: Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. J. Dev. Econ. 73(2), 607–629 (2004)
de la Croix, D., Licandro, O.: Life expectancy and endogenous growth. Econ. Lett. 65(2), 255–263 (1999)
de la Croix, D., Michel, P.: A Theory of Economic Growth. Dynamics and Policy in Overlapping Generations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
de la Croix, D., Ponthière, G.: On the golden rule of capital accumulation under endogenous longevity. Math. Soc. Sci. 59(2), 227–238 (2010)
Diamond, P.A.: National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am. Econ. Rev. 55(5), 1126–1150 (1965)
Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Endogenous fertility, endogenous lifetime and economic growth: the role of child policies. MPRA Working Paper no. 26146, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26146/ (2010)
Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Fertility and PAYG pensions in the overlapping generations model. J. Popul. Econ. 25(3), 955–961 (2012a)
Fanti, L., Gori, L.: Endogenous lifetime in an overlapping generations small open economy. FinanzArch/Public Finance Anal. 68(2), 1–32 (2012b)
Fioroni, T.: Optimal savings and health spending over the life cycle. Eur. J. Health Econ. 11(4), 355–365 (2010)
Fogel, R.W.: Economic growth, population theory and physiology: the bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(3), 369–395 (1994)
Fogel, R.W.: The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)
Galor, O.: From stagnation to growth: unified growth theory. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth (Chap. 4). Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
Galor, O.: Comparative economic development: insights from unified growth theory. Int. Econ. Rev. 51(1), 1–44 (2010)
Galor, O., Moav, O.: Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 117(4), 1133–1191 (2002)
Galor, O., Weil, D.N.: From malthusian stagnation to modern growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(2), 150–154 (1999)
Galor, O., Weil, D.N.: Population, technology, and growth: from malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am. Econ. Rev. 90(4), 806–828 (2000)
Gollin, D.: Getting income shares right. J. Polit. Econ. 110(2), 458–474 (2002)
Golosov, M., Jones, L.E., Tertilt, M.: Efficiency with endogenous population growth. Econometrica 75(4), 1039–1071 (2007)
Grandmont, J.M., Pintus, P., de Vilder, R.: Capital-labor substitution and competitive nonlinear endogenous business cycles. J. Econ. Theory 80(1), 14–59 (1998)
Hubbard, R.G., Judd, K.L.: Social security and individual welfare: precautionary saving, borrowing constraints, and the payroll tax. Am. Econ. Rev. 77(4), 630–646 (1987)
Hurd, M.D.: The economics of individual aging. In: Rosenzweig, M., Stark, O. (eds.) Handbook of Population and Family Economics, pp. 891–966. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1997)
Kraay, A., Raddatz, C.: Poverty traps, aid, and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 82(2), 315–347 (2007)
Leung, M.C.M., Wang, Y.: Endogenous health care, life expectancy and economic growth. Pacific Econ. Rev. 15(1), 11–31 (2010)
Livi-Bacci, M.: A Concise History of World Population, Forth edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden (2006)
Lorenz, H.W.: Nonlinear Dynamical Economics and Chaotic Motion. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Lorentzen, P., McMillan, J., Wacziarg, R.: Death and development. J Econ. Growth 13(2), 81–124 (2008)
Martikainen, P., Valkonen, T., Moustgaard, H.: The effect of individual taxable income, household taxable income and household disposable income on mortality in Finland, 1998–2004. Popul. Stud. 63(2), 147–162 (2009)
Mason, A.: Saving, economic growth, and demographic change. Popul. Dev. Rev. 14(1), 113–144 (1988)
Medio, A.: Chaotic Dynamics: Theory and Applications to Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Michel, P., de la Croix, D.: Myopic and perfect foresight in the OLG model. Econ. Lett. 67(1), 53–60 (2000)
Moav, O.: Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Econ. J. 115(500), 88–110 (2005)
Pestieau, P., Ponthière, G., Sato, M.: Longevity, health spending and pay-as-you-go pensions. FinanzArch/Public Finance Anal. 64(1), 1–18 (2008)
Varvarigos, D., Zakaria, I.Z.: Endogenous fertility in a growth model with public and private health expenditures. J Popul. Econ. 26(1), 67–85 (2013)
Zhang, J., Zhang, J.: Social security, intergenerational transfers, and endogenous growth. Can. J. Econ. 31(5), 1225–1241 (1998)
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Michael Kopel, Mauro Sodini, Piero Manfredi, Luigi Bonatti and participants at both the NED11 (Nonlinear Economic Dynamics) conference, held on 1 to 3 June 2011, at the Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Spain, and SIE 2011 (Società Italiana degli Economisti), held on 14–15 October, 2011, for stimulating discussions and valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier draft. The authors also acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fanti, L., Gori, L. & Tramontana, F. Endogenous lifetime, accidental bequests and economic growth. Decisions Econ Finan 37, 81–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0138-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0138-2