Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selecting stochastic mortality models for the Italian population

  • Published:
Decisions in Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The future revision of capital requirements and a market-consistent valuation of non-hedgeable liabilities lead to an increasing attention on forecasting longevity trends. In this field, many methodologies focus on either modeling mortality or pricing mortality-linked securities (as longevity bonds). Following Lee–Carter method (proposed in 1992), actuarial literature has provided several extensions in order to consider different trends observed in European data set (e.g., the cohort effect). The purpose of the paper is to compare the features of main mortality models proposed over the years. Model selection became indeed a primary task with the aim to identify the “best” model. What is meant by best is controversial, but good selection techniques are usually based on a good balance between goodness of fit and simplicity. In this regard, different criteria, mainly based on residual and projected rates analysis, are here used. For the sake of comparison, main forecasting methods have been applied to deaths and exposures to risk of male Italian population. Weaknesses and strengths have been emphasized, by underlying how various models provide a different goodness of fit according to different data sets. At the same time, the quality and the variability of forecasted rates have been compared by evaluating the effect on annuity values. Results confirm that some models perform better than others, but no single model can be defined as the best method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alho J.: Discussion of “The Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality, with various extensions and applications”. North Am. Actuar. J. 4, 91–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biffis E.: Affine processes for dynamic mortality and actuarial valuations. Insur. Math. Econ. 37, 443–468 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake D., Burrows W.: Survivor bonds: helping to hedge mortality risk. J. Risk Insur. 68, 339–348 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake D., Cairns A.J.G., Dowd K., Macminn R.: Longevity bonds: financial engineering, valuation and hedging. J. Risk Insur. 73, 647–672 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouhns N., Denuit M., Van Keilegom I.: Bootstrapping the Poisson log-bilinear model for mortality forecasting. Scand. Actuar. J. 3, 212–224 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouhns N., Denuit M., Vermunt J.: A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insur. Math. Econ. 31, 373–393 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns A.J.G., Blake D., Dowd K.: A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration. J. Risk Insur. 73, 687–718 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns A.J.G., Blake D., Dowd K.: Pricing death: framework for the valuation and securization of mortality risk. Astin Bull. 36, 79–120 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd. K.: Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review. Pensions Institute Discussion Paper, PI-0814 (2008)

  • Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A., Balevich, I.: A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England & Wales and the United States. 13(1):1–35 (2009)

  • Cramér H., Wold H.: Mortality variations in Sweden: a study in graduation and forecasting. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 18, 161–241 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl M.: Stochastic mortality in life insurance: market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts. Insur. Math. Econ. 35, 113–136 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’amato V., Haberman S., Russolillo M.: The Poisson log-bilinear Lee Carter model: efficient bootstrap in life annuity actuarial analysis. North Am. Actuar. J. 15(2), 315–333 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd K., Cairns A.J.G., Blake D., Coughlan G.D., Epstein D., Khalaf-Allah M.: Backtesting stochastic mortality models: an ex-post evaluation of multiperiod-ahead density forecast. North Am. Actuar. J. 14(3), 281–298 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K., Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Khalaf-Allah, M.: Evaluating the goodness of fit of stochastic mortality models. Pensions Institute Discussion Paper PI-0802 (2008)

  • Gerber U.H., Pafumi G.: Utility functions: from risk theory to finance. North Am. Actuar. J. 2, 74–100 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman S., Renshaw A.: On age-period-cohort parametric mortality rate projections. Insur. Math. Econ. 45(2), 255–270 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman S., Renshaw A.: A comparative study of parametric mortality projection models. Insur. Math. Econ. 48(1), 35–55 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlis D., Kostaki A.: Bootstrap techniques for mortality models. Biometrical J. 44(7), 850–866 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R.D.: The Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality, with various extensions and applications. North Am. Actuar. J. 4(1), 80–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R.D., Carter L.R.: Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 659–675 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovasz E.: Analysis of Finnish and Swedish mortality data with stochastic mortality models. Eur. Actuar. J. 1, 259–289 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky M.A., Promislow S.D.: Mortality derivatives and the option to annuitise. Insur. Math. Econ. 29, 299–318 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitacco, E.: From Halley to “frailty”: a review of survival models for actuarial calculations. Giornale dell’ Istituto Italiano degli attuari, LXVII(1–2):17–47 (2004)

  • Plat R.: On stochastic mortality modeling. Insur. Math. Econ. 45(3), 393–404 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw A.E., Haberman S.A.: Cohort based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insur. Math. Econ. 38, 556–570 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willets R.C.: The Cohort effect: insights and explanations. Br. Actuar. J. 10(4), 833–877 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, S., Sherris, M.: Integrating financial and demographic longevity risk models: an Australian model for financial applications. Australian School of Business Research Paper, ACTL05 (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Discipline Matematiche, Finanza Matematica ed Econometria, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Paola Biffi & Gian Paolo Clemente

Authors
  1. Paola Biffi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gian Paolo Clemente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Biffi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biffi, P., Clemente, G.P. Selecting stochastic mortality models for the Italian population. Decisions Econ Finan 37, 255–286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0131-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0131-9

JEL Classification

Keywords

Search

Navigation