Skip to main content
Log in

Innovations in neuroscience: prospects and perils

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Poiesis & Praxis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The results of this collaboration presumably will get published by the end of this year as volume no. 29 of the Europäische Akademie’s book series Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung.

  2. This being the title of a report by the U.S. President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) that greatly stimulated the international debate on enhancement issues.

  3. Most notably the “Transhumanists” whose activities can be surveyed at http://www.transhumanism.org/.

  4. These so-called neuroprosthetic devices were the topic of an earlier article in Poiesis & Praxis (Rosahl 2004).

  5. For the sake of accuracy, it should be mentioned, that Professor Schlaepfer did not attend the workshop in Brussels mentioned earlier, but rather presented the ideas of this article to the said project group on occasion of a meeting that was held in June 2005 in Leuven.

References

  • Illes J, Rosen AC, Huang L, Goldstein RA, Raffin TA, Swan G, Atlas SW (2004) Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research. Neurology 62:888–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) Beyond therapy—biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Rosahl SK (2004) Vanishing senses—restoration of sensory functions by electronic implants. Poiesis Prax 2:285–295 DOI 10.1007/s10202-003-0057-y

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Galert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merkel, R., Galert, T. Innovations in neuroscience: prospects and perils. Poiesis Prax 4, 77–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-006-0023-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-006-0023-6

Navigation