Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in estimation by the item sum technique using auxiliary information in complex surveys

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To collect sensitive data, survey statisticians have designed many strategies to reduce nonresponse rates and social desirability response bias. In recent years, the item count technique has gained considerable popularity and credibility as an alternative mode of indirect questioning survey, and several variants of this technique have been proposed as new needs and challenges arise. The item sum technique (IST), which was introduced by Chaudhuri and Christofides (Indirect questioning in sample surveys, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2013) and Trappmann et al. (J Surv Stat Methodol 2:58–77, 2014), is one such variant, used to estimate the mean of a sensitive quantitative variable. In this approach, sampled units are asked to respond to a two-list of items containing a sensitive question related to the study variable and various innocuous, nonsensitive, questions. To the best of our knowledge, very few theoretical and applied papers have addressed the IST. In this article, therefore, we present certain methodological advances as a contribution to appraising the use of the IST in real-world surveys. In particular, we employ a generic sampling design to examine the problem of how to improve the estimates of the sensitive mean when auxiliary information on the population under study is available and is used at the design and estimation stages. A Horvitz–Thompson-type estimator and a calibration-type estimator are proposed and their efficiency is evaluated by means of an extensive simulation study. Using simulation experiments, we show that estimates obtained by the IST are nearly equivalent to those obtained using “true data” and that in general they outperform the estimates provided by a competitive randomized response method. Moreover, variance estimation may be considered satisfactory. These results open up new perspectives for academics, researchers and survey practitioners and could justify the use of the IST as a valid alternative to traditional direct questioning survey modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcos, A., Rueda, M.M., Singh, S.: Generalized approach to randomized response for quantitative variables. Qual. Quant. 49, 1239–1256 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, A., Sutton, S.G.: Understanding recreational fishers compliance with no-take zones in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ecol. Soc. (2013). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05872-180418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnab, R., Singh, S.: Randomized response techniques: an application to the Botswana AIDS impact survey. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 140, 941–953 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aronow, P.M., Coppock, A., Crawford, F.W., Green, D.P.: Combining list experiment and direct question estimates of sensitive behavior prevalence. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol. 3, 43–66 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Lev, S.K., Bobovitch, E., Boukai, B.: A note on randomized response models for quantitative data. Metrika 60, 255–260 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, G., Imai, K.: List: statistical methods for the item count technique and list experiment. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=list (2010)

  • Blair, G., Imai, K.: Statistical analysis of list experiments. Polit. Anal. 20, 47–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, G., Imai, K., Lyall, J.: Comparing and combining list and endorsement experiments: evidence from Afghanistan. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58, 1043–1063 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S.G., Gavin, M.C.: The randomized response technique as a tool for estimating non-compliance rates in fisheries: a case study of illegal red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) fishing in Northern California. Environ. Conserv. 36, 112–119 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, M.Y.: Application of the randomized response technique to marine park management: an assessment of permit compliance. Environ. Manag. 9, 393–398 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A.: Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., Christofides, T.C.: Item count technique in estimating the proportion of people with a sensitive feature. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 137, 589–593 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., Christofides, T.C.: Indirect Questioning in Sample Surveys. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., Mukerjee, R.: Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conteh, A., Gavin, M.C., Solomon, J.: Quantifying illegal hunting: a novel application of the randomised response technique. Biol. Conserv. 189, 16–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christofides, T.C.: A new version of the item count technique. Model Assist. Stat. Appl. 10, 289–297 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deville, J.C., Särndal, C.E.: Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 376–382 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, G., Perri, P.F.: Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information. Stat. Pap. 50, 661–672 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, G., Perri, P.F.: New scrambled response models for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character. J. Appl. Stat. 37, 1875–1890 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, G., Perri, P.F.: A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data. Stat. Pap. 52, 633–650 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, G., Perri, P.F.: A calibration-based approach to sensitive data: a simulation study. J. Appl. Stat. 39, 53–65 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, P., Striegel, H., Franke, A.G., Lieb, K., Simon, P., Ulrich, R.: Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students. Pharmacotherapy 33, 44–50 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droitcour, J.A., Caspar, R.A., Hubbard, M.L., Parsley, T.L., Visseher, W., Ezzati, T.M.: The item count technique as a method of indirect questioning: a review of its development and a case study application. In: Biemer, P.P., Groves, R.M., Lyburg, L.E., Mathiowetz, N., Sudmar, S. (eds.) Measurement Error in Surveys, pp. 187–209. Wiley, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Droitcour, J.A., Larson, E.M.: An innovative technique for asking sensitive questions: the three-card method. Bull. Soc. Methodol. 75, 5–23 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, B.H., Hayre, L.S.: Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 7, 306–316 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.A., Tracy, P.E.: Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Survey. Sage Publication Inc, Newbury Park (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, A.N.: What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment. Pub. Opin. Q. 77, 159–172 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, M.S., Gruson, V.: The randomized response technique: a test on drug use. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70, 814–818 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A.L., Krosnick, J.A.: Measuring voter turnout by using the randomized response technique: evidence calling into question the method’s validity. Pub. Opin. Q. 74, 328–343 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A.L., Krosnick, J.A.: Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: tests using the item count technique. Pub. Opin. Q. 74, 37–67 (2010b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D.G., Thompson, D.J.: A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 663–685 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J., Tran, A.: A survey of tax evasion using the randomized response technique. Adv. Tax. 13, 69–94 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, Z., Shah, E.A., Shabbir, J.: An alternative item count technique in sensitive surveys. Revista Colombiana de Estadistica 35, 39–54 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, Z., Shabbir, N., Shabbir J.: An alternative item sum technique for improved estimators of population mean in sensitive surveys. Hacet. J. Math. Stat., First published online 46, 907–934 (2017)

  • Imai, K.: Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106, 407–416 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., Park, B., Greene, K.F.: Using the predicted responses from list experiments as explanatory variables in regression models. Polit. Anal. 23, 180–196 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R.A., Nepusz, T., Naughton, D.P., Petróczi, A.: A potential inflating effect in estimation models: cautionary evidence from comparing performance enhancing drug and herbal hormonal supplement use estimates. Psychol. Sports Exerc. 14, 84–96 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann, B., Jerke, J., Krumpal, I.: Asking sensitive questions using the crosswise model: an experimental survey measuring plagiarism. Pub. Opin. Q. 76, 32–49 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, J.: Estimating a logit model with randomized data: the case of cocaine use. Aust. J. Stat. 36, 9–20 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korndörfer, M., Krumpal, I., Schmukle, S.C.: Measuring and explain tax evasion: improving self-reports using the crosswise model. J. Econ. Psychol. 45, 18–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kott, P.S.: Developing calibration weights and standard-error estimates for a survey of drug-related emergency-department visits. J. Off. Stat. 30, 521–532 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kott, P.S., Chang, T.: Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonignorable unit nonresponse. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 105, 1265–1275 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krumpal, I.: Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-semitism in Germany: a comparison of the randomized response technique and direct questioning. Soc. Sci. Res. 41, 1387–1403 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, D., Strickler, J., Olavarrieta, C.D., García, S.G., Ellertson, C.: Measuring induced abortion in Mexico: a comparison of four methodologies. Soc. Methods Res. 32, 529–558 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, D., García, S.G., Ellertson, C., Camlin, C., Suaréz, J.: The measure of induced abortion in Mexico using random response technique. Soc. Methods Res. 35, 279–301 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Hox, J.J., van der Heijden, P.G.M., Mass, C.J.M.: Meta-analysis of randomized response research: thirty-five years of validation. Soc. Methods Res. 33, 319–348 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., van der Heijden, P.G.M., Laudy, O., van Gils, G.: A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 169, 305–318 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D.: A New Survey Technique for Studying Deviant Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, The George Washington University (1984)

  • Miller, J.D.: The nominative technique: a new method of estimating heroin prevalence. NIDA Res. Monogr. 57, 104–124 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveras, E., Letamo, G.: Examples of methods to address underreporting of induced abortion: preceding birth technique and randomized response technique. In: Singh, S., Remez, L., Tartaglione, A. (eds.) Methodologies for Estimating Abortion Incidence and Abortion-Related Morbidity: A Review, pp. 63–69. Guttmacher Institute, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, New York, Paris (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostapczuk, M., Musch, J., Mashagen, M.: A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes towards foreigners. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 920–931 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perri, P.F., Diana, G.: Scrambled response models based on auxiliary variables. In: Torelli, N., Pesarin, F., Bar-Hen, A. (eds.) Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, pp. 281–291. Spriger-Verlag, Berlin (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perri, P.F., Pelle, E., Stranges, M.: Estimating induced abortion and foreign irregular presence using the randomized response crossed model. Soc. Indic. Res. 129, 601–618 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavarao, D., Federer, W.F.: Block total response as an alternative to the randomized response method in survey. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 41, 40–45 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, M., Cobo, B., Arcos, A.: An improved class of estimators in RR surveys. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4256

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.E.: The calibration approach in survey theory and practice. Surv Methodol. 33, 99–119 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.E., Lundström, S.: Estimation in Survey with Nonresponse. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schill, D.J., Kline, P.A.: Use of random response to estimate angler noncompliance with fishing regulations. North Am. J. Fish. Manag. 15, 721–731 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsipour, M., Yunesian, M., Fotouhi, A., Jann, B., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., Asghari, F., Akhlaghi, A.A.: Estimating the prevalence of illicit drug use among students using the crosswise model. Subst. Use Misuse 49, 1303–1310 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P.: Estimating a finite population mean of a sensitive quantitative variable from a single probability sample by the Item Count Technique. Model Assist. Stat. Appl. 10, 411–419 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P.: Estimating a finite population proportion bearing a sensitive attribute from a single probability sample by Item Count Technique. In: Chaudhuri, A., Christofides, T.C., Rao, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics Vol. 34: Data Gathering, Analysis and Protection of Privacy Through Randomized Response Techniques: Qualitative and Quantitative Human Traits, pp. 387–404. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, P., Striegel, H., Aust, F., Dietz, K., Ulrich, R.: Doping in fitness sports: estimated number of unreported cases and individual probability of doping. Addiction 101, 1640–1644 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Jacobson, S.K., Wald, K.D., Gavin, M.: Estimating illegal resources use at the Ugandan park with the randomized response technique. Hum. Dimens. Wildlife 12, 75–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Striegel, H., Ulrich, R., Simon, P.: Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 106, 230–232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, J.H., Chorus, A.M.J., Frank, L.E., de Hon, O., van der Heijden, P.G.M.: Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness center members. Drug Test. Anal. 6, 434–438 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhatme, P.V., Sukhatme, B.V., Sukhatme, S., Asok, C.: Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications. Iowa State University Press, Ames (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, G.-L., Tang, M.-L.: Incomplete Categorical Data Design: Non-Randomized Response Techniques for Sensitive Questions in Surveys. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Trappmann, M., Krumpal, I., Kirchner, A., Jann, B.: Item sum: a new technique for asking quantitative sensitive questions. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol. 2, 58–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, P.G.M., van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J.J.: A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning. Soc. Methods Res. 28, 505–537 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S.L.: Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 63–69 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain (Grant MTM2015-63609-R), Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (Grant FPU, Spain) and by the project PRIN-SURWEY (Grant 2012F42NS8, Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Granada, Campus Universitario Fuentenueva S/N, 18071, Granada, Spain

    María del Mar García Rueda & Beatriz Rodríguez Cobo

  2. Department of Economics, Statistics and Finance, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036, Arcavacata di Rende, Italy

    Pier Francesco Perri

Authors
  1. María del Mar García Rueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pier Francesco Perri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beatriz Rodríguez Cobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Francesco Perri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rueda, M.d.M.G., Perri, P.F. & Cobo, B.R. Advances in estimation by the item sum technique using auxiliary information in complex surveys. AStA Adv Stat Anal 102, 455–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-017-0315-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-017-0315-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation