Skip to main content
Log in

Microeconometric models and anonymized micro data

  • Articles
  • Published:
Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The paper first provides a short review of the most common microeconometric models including logit, probit, discrete choice, duration models, models for count data and Tobit-type models. In the second part we consider the situation that the micro data have undergone some anonymization procedure which has become an important issue since otherwise confidentiality would not be guaranteed. We shortly describe the most important approaches for data protection which also can be seen as creating errors of measurement by purpose. We also consider the possibility of correcting the estimation procedure while taking into account the anonymization procedure. We illustrate this for the case of binary data which are anonymized by ‘post-randomization’ and which are used in a probit model. We show the effect of ‘naive’ estimation, i. e. when disregarding the anonymization procedure. We also show that a ‘corrected’ estimate is available which is satisfactory in statistical terms. This is also true if parameters of the anonymization procedure have to be estimated, too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., Trivedi, P. (2005). Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis. 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, A. K. (1987). Non-parametric analysis of a generalized regression model: The maximum rank correlation estimator. Journal of Econometrics 35 303–316.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., Abrevaya, J., Scott-Morton, F. M. (1998). Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting. Journal of Econometrics 87 239–269.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kommission zur Verbesserung der Informationellen Infrastruktur (Ed) (2001). Wege zu einer besseren informationellen Infrastruktur. Nomos, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, P., L. Willenborg, Gouweleeuw, J. (1997). PRAM: a method for disclosure limitation of micro data.. http://www.cbs.nl/sdc/ruis.htm.

  • Lechner, S., Pohlmeier, W. (2003). Schätzung ökonometrischer Modelle auf der Grundlage anonymisierter Daten. In Anonymisierung wirtschaftsstatistischer Einzeldaten (R. Gnoss, G. Ronning, eds.), Forum der Bundesstatistik, 42 115–137.

  • Lechner, S., Pohlmeier, W. (2005). Data masking by noise addition and the estimation of nonparametric regression models. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 225 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmeier, W., Ronning, G., Wagner, J. (2005). Econometrics of anonymized micro data. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 225 Sonderband.

  • Ronning, G. (1991). Mikroökonometrie. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, G. (1996). Ökonometrie. In Springers Handbuch der Volkswirtschaftslehre (A. Börsch-Supan, J. v. Hagen, P. J. J. Welfens, eds.), 78–134. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, G. (2005). Randomized response and the binary probit model. Economics Letters 86 221–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, G., Gnoss, R. (2003). Anonymisierung wirtschaftsstatistischer Einzeldaten. Statistisches Bundesamt. Forum der Bundesstatistik, Band 42, Wiesbaden.

  • Ronning, G, Rosemann, M., Strotmann, H. (2005a). Post-randomization under test: Estimation of the probit model. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 225 544–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, G., Sturm, R., Höhne, J., Lenz, J., Rosemann, M., Scheffler, M., Vorgrimler, D. (2005b). Handbuch zur Anonymisierung wirtschaftsstatistischer Mikrodaten. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, Reihe “Statistik und Wissenschaft”, Band 4, 2005.

  • Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., Wretman, J. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M., Schneeweiss, H. (2005). The effect of microaggregation procedures on the estimation of linear models. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 225, 529–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2002). Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: A review. International Statistical Review 70 2–69.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, M. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics. Wiley, Chichester.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57 622–627.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research in this paper is related to the project “Faktische Anonymisierung wirtschaftsstatistischer Einzeldaten” financed by German Ministry of Research and Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronning, G. Microeconometric models and anonymized micro data. Allgemeines Statistisches Arch 90, 153–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0227-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0227-z

Keywords

Navigation