Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential monitoring of minimum variance portfolio

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates the economic effect of monitoring the minimum variance portfolio weights, which depend solely on the covariance matrix of returns. The investor decides whether the portfolio composition providing the smallest portfolio variance remains optimal at the beginning of every new investment period. For this purpose changes in the optimal weights are sequentially detected by means of EWMA control charts. Signals obtained from monitoring are used for improvement of the covariance matrix estimation procedure. The investment strategy exploiting signals from control charts is compared with a number of alternative approaches in the empirical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreou, E., Ghysels, E. (2002) Rolling-sample volatility estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20, 363–376

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, A., Urga, G. (2005) Modeling structural breaks, long memory and stock market volatility: an overview. Journal of Econometrics 129, 1–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Shephard, N. (2004) Econometric analysis of realized covariation. Econometrica 71, 885–925

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauwens, L., Laurent, S., Rombouts, J. (2006) Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 79–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Best, M., Grauer, R. (1991) On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means. Review of Financial Studies 4, 315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastisity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 307–327

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Busse, J. (1999) Volatility timing in mutual funds: evidence from daily returns. Review of Financial Studies 12, 1009–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, L.K.C., Karceski, J., Lakonishok, J. (1999) On portfolio optimization: forecasting covariances and choosing the risk model. Review of Financial Studies 12, 937–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu, C.S., Stinchcombe, M., White, H. (1996) Monitoring structural change. Econometrica 64, 1045–1065

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Engle, R. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50, 987–1008

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Eraker, B., Johannes, M., Polson, N. (2003) The impact of jumps in volatility and returns. Journal of Finance 58, 1269–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fama, E.F., MacBeth, J.D. (1973) Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81, 607–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fleming, J., Kirby, C., Ostdiek, B. (2001) The economic value of volatility timing. Journal of Finance 56, 329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming, J., Kirby, C., Ostdiek, B. (2003) The economic value of volatility timing using ‘realized’ volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 67, 473–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Foster, D.P., Nelson, D.B. (1996) Continuous record asymptotics for rolling sample variance estimators. Econometrica 64, 139–174

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Franses, P.H., van Dijk, D. (2000) Nonlinear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golosnoy, V., Schmid, W. (2007) EWMA control charts for monitoring changes in the optimal portfolio weights. Sequential Analysis, in press

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh, B.K., Sen, P.K. (eds.) (1991) Handbook of Sequential Analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gohout, W., Specht, K. (2007) Mean-variance portfolio using Bayesian vector autoregressive forecasts. Statistical Papers, in press

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harvey, A., Ruiz, E., Shephard, N. (1994) Multivariate stochastic volatility models. Review of Economic Studies 61, 247–264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillebrand, E. (2005) Neglecting parameter changes in GARCH models. Journal of Econometrics 129, 121–138

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu, D., Miller, R., Wichern, D. (1974) On the stable Paretian behavior of stock market prices. Journal of American Statistical Association 69, 108–113

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, D., Kon, S. (1999) Structural change and time dependence in models of stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 6, 283–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klein, R., Bawa, V. (1976) The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kramer, H.G., Schmid, W. (1997) EWMA charts for multivariate time series. Sequential Analysis 16, 131–154

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Ledoit, O., Wolf, M. (2003) Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. Journal of Empirical Finance 10, 603–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liesenfeld, R., Richard, J.-P. (2003) Univariate and multivariate stochastic volatility models: estimation and diagnostics. Journal of Empirical Finance 10, 505–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maheu, J., McCurdy, T. (2004) News arrival, jump dynamics, and volatility components for individual stock returns. Journal of Finance 59, 755–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7, 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mittnik, S., Rachev, S. (2000) Stable Paretian Models in Finance. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Merton, R.C. (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market. Journal of Financial Economics 8, 323–361

    Google Scholar 

  32. Michaud, R.O. (1998) Efficient Asset Management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mihailescu, L. (2004) A sequential method for the evaluation of the VaR model based on the run between exceedances. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 88, 51–72

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Montgomery, D.C. (2005) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control 5th edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Okhrin, Y., Schmid, W. (2006) Distributional properties of optimal portfolio weights. Journal of Econometrics 134, 235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pelletier, D. (2006) Regime switching for dynamic correlations. Journal of Econometrics 121, 445–473

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Pesaran, M.H., Timmermann, A. (2007) Selection of estimation window in the presence of breaks. Journal of Econometrics, in press

    Google Scholar 

  38. Polzehl, J., Spokoiny, V. (2004) Varying coefficient GARCH versus constant volatility modeling. WIAS-working paper 977

  39. RiskGradesTM Technical Document (1996) RiskMetrics#, http://www.riskmetrics.com/techdoc.html

  40. Ruiz, E. (1994) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic volatility models. Journal of Econometrics 63, 289–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ryden, T., Teräsvirta, T., Åsbrink, S. (1998) Stylized facts of daily return series and the hidden Markov model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 13, 217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schipper, S., Schmid, W. (2001) Sequential methods for detecting changes in the variance of economic time series. Sequential Analysis 20, 235–262

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmid, W., Tzotchev, D. (2004) Statistical surveillance of the parameters of a one-factor Cox-Ingersoll-Ross model. Sequential Analysis 23, 379–412

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwert, G.W. (1989) Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance 44, 1115–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Severin, T., Schmid, W. (1999) Monitoring changes in GARCH models. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 83, 281–307

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sonesson, C. (2003) Evaluations of some exponentially weighted moving average methods. Journal of Applied Statistics 30, 1115–1133

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Theodossiou, P.T. (1993) Predicting shifts in the mean of a multivariate time series process. Journal of American Statistical Association, 88, 441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Timmermann, A. (2000) Moments of Markov switching models. Journal of Econometrics 96, 75–111

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Woodall, W. H. (2000) Controversies and contradictions in statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology 32, 341–378

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yashchin, E., Stein D., Philips, T. (1997) Monitoring active portfolios using statistical process control. In: H. Amman, B. Rustem, A.B. Whinston (eds.) Computational Approaches to Economic Problems, pp. 193–205. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasyl Golosnoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Golosnoy, V. Sequential monitoring of minimum variance portfolio . AStA 91, 39–55 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0016-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0016-8

Keywords

Navigation