Abstract
Recently, government entities are increasingly looking at human factors and alarm management in pipeline control rooms. In a 2005 study, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommended improvements in graphics design, alarm management, human factors (e.g., fatigue), training, and leak detection. As a follow-up, in 2006 the 109th congress passed a bill that includes the adoption of American Petroleum Industry’s 1165 standard on SCADA graphics, standards for review and audit of alarms, standards for pipeline controller training, and regulations (PHMSA in Pipeline safety: control room management/human factors; proposed rule. Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 178. 49 CFR Parts 192, 193, and 195, 2008) that deal with human factors in pipeline control rooms, particularly fatigue and shift work (API in API—RP 1165—2007, recommended practice for Pipeline SCADA displays. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2007). These legislative efforts are being pursued in an effort to help ensure companies operate more safely, reduce economic loss, and decrease environmental damage. However, perplexity in regard to human factors and alarm management best practices still exist within the pipeline community. This study will briefly discuss some of the major components in regard to human factors considerations in pipeline control room console and display design. These concepts were applied in an experiment designed to test participant response time, acknowledgement time, and accuracy in regard to varying alarm rates and display types. Results indicate that there is a significant difference in 20 alarms in 10 min when compared to all other alarm rates. Also, there is a significant difference in 20 alarms in 10 min using a chronological display as opposed to a categorical display. Based on these findings, it is recommended that alarm rates do not exceed one alarm per minute and that a categorical type display be used in the control room for the most accurate and timely response to alarms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Petroleum Institute (API) (2009) API RP 1167: recommended practice for pipeline control room alarm management (vol. first edition)
API (2007) API Recommended Practice 1165, Recommended Practice for Pipeline SCADA Displays. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC
Bullemer PT, Nimmo I (1994) Understanding and supporting abnormal situation management in industrial process control environments: a new approach to training, San Antonio, TX, USA, IEEE, Piscataway, USA
Bullemer P, Nimmo I (1998) Tackle abnormal situation management with better training. Chem Eng Prog 94(1):43
Dunn DG, Sands NP (2005) ISA-SP18—Alarm systems management and design guide, Chicago, IL, United States, ISA—Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States
EEMUA (1999) Alarm systems: a guide to design, management and procurement. Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association, London
EEMUA (2002) Process plant control desks utilising human-computer interfaces. Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association, London
Errington J, Reising DVC, Bullemer P, Demaere T, Coppard D, Doe K, Bloom C (2005) Establishing human performance improvements and economic benefit for a human-centered operator interface: an industrial evaluation. Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet Proc 49:2036–2040
Errington J, Reising DV, Harris K (2006) ASM outperforms traditional interface. Chem Process 69(3):55–58
ISA (2008) ISA—18.02—2008, Management of Alarm Systems for the Process Industries, ISA—Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States
MPR Associates I, B. N. Laboratory (2004) Human factors guidance for control room and digital human-system interface design and modification, guidelines for planning, specification, design, licensing, implementation, training, operation and maintenance. United States, p 1136
Nimmo I (1995) Abnormal situation management LA, USA, Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, New Orleans
Nimmo I (2002) It’s time to consider human factors in alarm management. Chem Eng Prog 98(11):30–38
Pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration (PHMSA), D. O. T. (2008). Pipeline safety: control room management/human factors; proposed rule. Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 178. 49 CFR Parts 192, 193, and 195
Reising DVC, Montgomery T (2005) Achieving effective alarm system performance: results of ASM (registered trademark) consortium benchmarking against the EEMUA guide for alarm systems, Atlanta, GA, United States, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, pp 10016–5991
Reising DVC, Downs JL, Danni B (2004) Human Performance Models for Response to Alarm Notifications in the Process Industries: an Industrial Case Study. Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet Proc 48:1189–1193
Shahriari M, Shee A, Ortengren R (2006) The development of critical criteria to improve the alarm system in the process industry. Hum Fact Ergon Manuf 16(3):321–337
Smith KD, Walker BA (2001) Optimum console design promotes control room efficiency. (cover story). Hydrocarb Process 80(9):163
Tullis TS (1983) The formatting of alphanumeric displays: a review and analysis. Hum Fact: J Hum Fact Ergon Soc 25(6):657–682
Walker BA, Smith KD, Kekich MD (2003) Limiting shift-work fatigue in process control. Chem Eng Prog 99(4):54–57
Watts-Perotti J, Woods DD (1999) How experienced users avoid getting lost in large display networks. Int J Hum Comput Interact 11(4):269–299
Woods DD (1984) Visual momentum—a concept to Improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer (article). Int J Man Mach Stud 21(3):229–244
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the members of the Wright State University Center for Operator Performance for their guidance and funding during the course of this project.
Conflict of interest
The Center for Operator Performance at Wright State University provided funds for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harvey, C.M., Uhack, G.D. & Bégat, V. Empirically evaluating and developing alarm rate standards for liquid pipeline control room operators. Cogn Tech Work 17, 521–528 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0326-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0326-2