Abstract.
Landscape pattern indices (LPI), which characterize various aspects of composition and configuration of categorical variables on a lattice (e.g., shape, clumping, proportion), have become increasingly popular for quantifying and characterizing various aspects of spatial patterns. Unlike in the case of spatial statistical models, when either the joint distribution of all values is characterized by a limited number of parameters, or the distribution is known for certain (usually random) cases, the distributions of LPI are not known. Therefore, comparisons of LPI or significance testing of differences among various landscapes and/or studies are uncertain. This paper scrutinizes six widely used LPI, which are computed based on categories mapped onto regular lattices. We designed a simulation using Gauss-Markov random fields to establish the empirical distributions of LPI as functions of landscape composition and configuration. We report the results for stationary binary landscapes. The confidence intervals for LPI are derived based on 1000 simulations of each given combination of parameters, and further details are evaluated for three illustrative cases. We report the distributions of the LPI along with their co-variation. Our results elucidate how proportion of cover classes and spatial autocorrelation simultaneously and significantly affect the outcome of LPI values. These results also highlight the importance and formal linkages between fully specified spatial stochastic models and spatial pattern analysis. We conclude that LPI must be compared with great care because of the drastic effects that both composition and configuration have on individual LPI values. We also stress the importance of knowing the expected range of variation about LPI values so that statistical comparisons and inferences can be made.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors gratefully acknowledge valuable insight and commentary regarding earlier versions of the manuscript from the GEOIDE ENV#4 project team, Dr. Barry Boots, Dr. Marie-Josée Fortin, Dr. Geoff Henebry, and the anonymous reviewers. Funding for this research was provided by project ENV#4 of the GEOIDE Network of Centres of Excellence and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Remmel, T., Csillag, F. When are two landscape pattern indices significantly different?. J Geograph Syst 5, 331–351 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-003-0116-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-003-0116-x