Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitivity analysis of related parameters in simulation of land subsidence and ground fissures caused by groundwater exploitation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic and mechanical parameters are very important in the calculation of models of land subsidence and ground fissures caused by groundwater exploitation. To investigate the degree of influence of these parameters on calculation of models of land subsidence and ground fissures, Morris’ global sensitivity analysis, combined with local sensitivity analysis, was applied. The accuracy of soil parameter sensitivity analysis is related closely to selection of the calculation model used. Based on Biot’s consolidation theory, and combined with the nonlinear rheological theory of soil, a three-dimensional full coupling mathematic model was established to simulate land subsidence and ground fissures, in which the constitutive relation in Biot’s consolidation theory was extended to viscoelastic plasticity. The dynamic relationships of soil parameters (porosity, permeability coefficient, parameters of soil deformation) accompanied by changes in the stress field were also considered. Consequently, this model conforms to actual conditions in the field. Nantong, Jiangsu Province in China, was selected to simulate and calculate land subsidence and ground fissures using this model, and the soil parameters’ sensitivities were analyzed. The results showed that elastic modulus, E, cohesion, c, and the specific weight of soil, \( \lambda \), have a significant influence on land subsidence and ground fissures, with the influence of the friction angle, \( \varphi \), on land subsidence, and of Poisson’s ratio, \( \nu\), on ground fissures taking second place. These five parameters are thus of major concern in the simulation of land subsidence and ground fissures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asadi R, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Simmons CT (2014) Finite volume coupling strategies for the solution of a Biot consolidation model. Comput Geotech 55(1):494–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankher KA, Al-Harthi AA (1999) Earth fissuring and land subsidence in western Saudi Arabia. Nat Hazards 20:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock RD, Schreider Sy (2006) Application of the Morris algorithm for sensitivity analysis of the REALM model for the Goulburn irrigation system. Environ Model Assess 11:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CX, Pei SP (2001) Research on groundwater exploitation land subsidence model. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 28(2):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dassargues A, Zhang J (1992) Land subsidence in Shanghai: hydrogeological conditions and subsidence measurements. Bull Eng Geol Environ 46(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferronato M, Castelletto N, Gambolati G (2010) A fully coupled 3-D mixed finite element model of Biot consolidation. J Comput Phys 229:4813–4830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong SL (1998) Effects of urban construction on land subsidence in Shanghai (in Chinese). Chin J Geol Hazard Control 9(2):108–111

    Google Scholar 

  • King DM, Perera BJC (2013) Morris method of sensitivity analysis applied to assess the importance of input variables on urban water supply yield—a case study. J Hydrol 477(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YM, Zhou FY (2004) Solution to a class of boundary value problem of three dimensional partial differential equation. J Jiangsu Univ Nat Sci J Earth Sci Environ Ed 25(4):328–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZJ, Zeng F (2011) Finite element numerical simulation of land subsidence and groundwater exploitation based on visco-elastic–plastic Biot’s consolidation theory. J Hydrodyn 23(5):615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Zhang J (2004) Improvement of Duncan-Chang nonlinear model and Shen Zhujiang’s elastoplastic model for granular soils. Rock Soil Mech 25(6):887–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZJ, Liu JB, Li L (2008) Three-dimensional full coupling numerical simulation of groundwater dewatering and land-subsidence in Quaternary loose sediments. Chin J Geotech Eng 30(2):193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng XM, Tian FQ (2011) Sensitivity analysis of model parameters for confined aquifer specific vulnerability assessment in leakage area. J Hydroelectr Eng 30(4):49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33:161–174

  • Peng GL (2005) Fortan 95. China Electric Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian JH, Yin ZZ (1996) Principle and canculation of geotechnics. China Waterpower Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran QQ, Li SL (1997) Study on dynamic models of reservoir parameters in the coupled simulation of multiphase flow and reservoir deformation. Pet Explor Dev 24(3):61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayyaf M, Mahdavi M, Barani OR, Feiznia S, Motamedvaziri B (2014) Simulation of land subsidence using finite element method: Rafsanjan plain case study. Nat Hazards 72:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serva L, Brunamonte F (2007) Subsidence in the Pontina Plain, Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu LC, Wang MM, Liu RG, Chen GH (2007) Sensitivity analysis of parameters in numerical simulation of groundwater. J Hohai Univ Nat Sci 35(5):491–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith IM, Griffiths DV (2003) Programming the finite element method, 3rd edn. (trans: Song W, Jianxin W, Lai W) Electronic Industry Press, Beijing

  • Song XM, Kong FZ, Zhan CS, Han JW, Zhang XH (2013) Parameter identification and global sensitivity analysis of Xin’anjiang model using meta-modeling approach. Water Sci Eng 6(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun YW, Wei XM, Pomeroy CA (2011) Global analysis of sensitivity of bioretention cell design elements to hydrologic performance. Water Sci Eng 4(3):246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian J, Liu XG, Shang GH (2005) Casing damage mechanism based on theory of fluid-solid coupling flow through underground rock. J Hydrodyn A20(2):221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu CG, Hu YM, Chang Y, Jiang Y, Li XZ, Bu RC, He HS (2004) Sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling. Chin J Appl Ecol 15(6):1056–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu YS, Shen SL, Cai ZY, Zhou GY (2008) The state of land subsidence and prediction approaches due to groundwater withdrawal in China. Nat Hazards 45:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Jiangsu Grand Special Fund (dk2014ky-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zu-jiang Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Wz., Luo, Zj. & Wu, Xh. Sensitivity analysis of related parameters in simulation of land subsidence and ground fissures caused by groundwater exploitation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 1143–1156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0897-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0897-z

Keywords

Navigation