Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven Smart Home project

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart Home technology looks set to become an increasingly common feature of domestic life. However commercial desire for technical innovation rather than explicit user needs are often the driving force behind the development of Smart Home products and services. This study adapts the Cultural Probe approach developed by Gaver et al. [2] to collect primarily visual data about what people value within their home environment. Whereas Cultural Probes are predominantly used to build empathy with users when designing product concepts, this approach attempted to provide similarly fun and engaging prompts for data collection when the design process and project context required more structured consideration of user needs. This paper presents the method developed, project findings and recommendations on how the method should be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulrich K, Eppinger S (2000) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E (1999) Cultural Probes. Interactions 6(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frohlich DK (2003) The social context of home computing. HP Laboratories

  4. Venkatesh A (1996) Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Commun ACM 39:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mateas M, Salvador T, Scholtz J, Sorensen D (1996) Engineering ethnography in the home. In: CHI ‘96 companion proceedings, pp 283–284

  6. Venkatesh A, Vitalari N (1992) Emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Manage Sci 38:121687–121706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tweed C, Quigley G (2000) The design and technological feasibility of home systems for the elderly. Research Report, School of Architecture, Queens University, Belfast

  8. Dewsbury G, Taylor B, Edge M (2001) The process of designing appropriate smart homes: including the user in the design. Scottish Centre for the Environmental Design Research, Robert Gordon University

  9. Gaver W (2001) Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. Royal College of Art, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes J, King V, Rodden T, Anderson H (1994) Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: CSCW’94. ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien J, Rodden T (1997) Interactive systems in domestic environments. designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods and techniques. ACM, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dray S, Mrazek D (1996) A day in the life of a family: an international ethnographic study. In: Wixon D, Ramey J (eds) Field methods casebook for software design. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien J, Rodden T (1999) At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set top box trial. ACM Trans Comput Human Interact (TOCHI) 6(3):282–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crabtree A, Rodden T (2004) Domestic routines and design for the home. Comput Support Coop Work J Collab Comput 13(2):191–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofmeester K, de Charon de Saint Germain E (Eds) (1999) Presence: new media for older people. Netherlands Design Institute

  16. Mättelmaki T (2005) Applying probes—from inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign 1(2):83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemmings T, Crabtree A, Rodden T, Clarke K, Rouncefield M (2002) Probing the probes. In: Binder T, Gregory J, Wagner I (eds) Proceedings of the 7th biennial participatory design conference, Malmo, Sweden 2002—PDC 2002, pp 42–50

  18. Rouncefield M, Crabtree A, Hemmings T, Rodden T, Chevherst K, Clarke K, Dewsbury G, Hughes J (2003) Designing with care: adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitrabive settings. In: Proceedings of OzCHI 2003. Ergonomics Society of Australia, Brisbane, pp 4–13

  19. Muller M (2003) Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) Handbook of HCI. Erlbaum, Mahway

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hutchinson H, Mackay W, Westerlund B, Druin A, Plaisant C et al (2003) Technology Probes: inspiring design for and with families. In: Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2003). ACM, New York, pp 17–24

  21. Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B (2004) Cultural Probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions 11(5):53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krippendorff K (1980) Content Analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, Sage, cited in Robson C (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell, Oxford

  23. Robson C (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco. ISBN 1-55860-411-1

  25. ISO 9186 (2001) Graphical symbols—test methods for judged comprehensibility and for comprehension

  26. Taylor A, Swan L (2005) Artful systems in the home CHI 2005 Portland, Oregan, USA, April 2 –7. ACM, New York, pp 642–650

  27. Koskinen I, Mättelmaki T, Battarbee K (2003) Professional empathic design. IT Press, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mättelmaki T, Battarbee K (2002) Empathy Probes. In: Proceedings of the participatory design conference, Malmo, Sweden 2002, pp 266–271

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work forms part of the TAHI projects, funded by UK’s Department for Trade and Industry and project partners. Thanks go to all the participants who took part in the Photo Study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ergonomics and Safety Research Institute, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3UZ, UK

    Victoria Haines, Val Mitchell, Catherine Cooper & Martin Maguire

Authors
  1. Victoria Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Val Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catherine Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Maguire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Haines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haines, V., Mitchell, V., Cooper, C. et al. Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven Smart Home project. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11, 349–359 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0075-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0075-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation