Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of the calibration’s VIM3 definition using the matrix of variance–covariance of input data

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the effects following the implementation of the concept of calibration presented in the 3rd edition of the international vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) and the repercussions of practitioners adopting VIM3. The new definition leads to modifications in the treatment of calibration data. It is now necessary to establish a relation which allows obtaining any measurement result from any indication of the measuring instrument. This relation takes into account uncertainties and any covariances, both on the values of the standards used and on the indications and maybe even the covariances. The usual statistical technique of regression, the ordinary least squares adjustment, does not generally enable to reach this goal. As a result, more sophisticated methods need to be used, for instance the Generalised Gauss Markov Regression. We compared both methods on a gas chromatograph calibration example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), Genova

    Google Scholar 

  2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2012) International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), JCGM 200:2012, (www.bipm.org)

  3. ISO (2006) ISO 6143 gas analysis—comparison methods for determining and checking the composition of calibration gas mixtures. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), Genova

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO (2010) ISO/TS 28037 determination and use of straight-line calibration functions. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), Genova

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bich W (2008) Interdependence between measurement uncertainty and traceability, Imeko workshop traceability to support CIPM MRA and other international arrangements. Accred Qual Assur 14:581–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with minor corrections

  7. Cox MG, Forbes AB, Harris PM, Smith I (2004) The classification and solution of regression problems for calibration, NPL Report CMSC 24/03. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collège Français de Métrologie (2014) Application du nouveau concept d’étalonnage du VIM3, 2014. LEXITIS Edition, France

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lira I (2002) Evaluating the measurement uncertainty: fundamentals and practical guidance. Institute of Physics, pp 144–148

  10. Caurant A, Lalère B, Schbath M-C, Stumpf C, Sutour C, Mace T, Quisefit J-P, Doussin J-F, Vaslin-Reimann S (2010) A new certified reference material for benzene measurement in air on a sorbent tube: development and proficiency testing. Anal Bioanal Chem 398(5):2265–2277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Software developed by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK, 2010 (www.npl.co.uk/mathematics-and-modelling-for-metrology) Software from Collège Français de Métrologie M-CARE Modélisation des résultats d’étalonnage, 2013 (www.cfmetrologie.com)

  12. Milton MJT, Harris PM, Smith IM, Brown AS, Goody BA (2006) Implementation of a generalised least squares methods for determining calibration curves from data with general uncertainty structures. Metrologia 43:S291–S298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is based on the discussions in the working group of the College Français de Métrologie, and the authors thank all the participants for the fruitful discussions [8]. Many thanks to Béatrice Lalère and Adrien Caurant for providing data related to the example of gas chromatograph calibration. The treatment of data presented in the example is based on software developed by a statistical project team leaded by Catherine Yardin from LNE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Priel.

Additional information

Disclaimer One of the authors is a member of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) Working Group 2 (VIM). The opinion expressed in this paper does not necessarily represent the views of this Working Group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priel, M., Désenfant, M. Implementation of the calibration’s VIM3 definition using the matrix of variance–covariance of input data. Accred Qual Assur 20, 107–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1107-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1107-6

Keywords

Navigation