Abstract
Recent studies have estimated the magnitude of climate feedback based on the correlation between time variations in outgoing radiation flux and sea surface temperature (SST). This study investigates the influence of the natural non-feedback variation (noise) of the flux occurring independently of SST on the determination of climate feedback. The observed global monthly radiation flux is used from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) for the period 2000–2008. In the observations, the time lag correlation of radiation and SST shows a distorted curve with low statistical significance for shortwave radiation while a significant maximum at zero lag for longwave radiation over the tropics. This observational feature is explained by simulations with an idealized energy balance model where we see that the non-feedback variation plays the most significant role in distorting the curve in the lagged correlation graph, thus obscuring the exact value of climate feedback. We also demonstrate that the climate feedback from the tropical longwave radiation in the CERES data is not significantly affected by the noise. We further estimate the standard deviation of radiative forcings (mainly from the noise) relative to that of the non-radiative forcings, i.e., the noise level from the observations and atmosphere–ocean coupled climate model simulations in the framework of the simple model. The estimated noise levels in both CERES (>13 %) and climate models (11–28 %) are found to be far above the critical level (~5 %) that begins to misrepresent climate feedback.
Notes
Lindzen and Choi (2011) stated that the variances of F rad and F non are 0.7, and 5, respectively. However, they were meant to be standard deviations, i.e., σ(F rad) = 0.7, and σ(F non) = 5.
References
Cho H, Ho CH, Choi YS (2012) The observed variation in cloud-induced longwave radiation in response to sea surface temperature over the Pacific warm pool from MTSAT-1R imagery. Geophys Res Lett 39:L18802
Choi YS, Song HJ (2012) On the numerical integration of a randomly forced system: variation and feedback estimation. Theor Appl Climatol 110:97–101
Choi YS, Lindzen RS, Ho CH, Kim J (2010) Space observations of cold-cloud phase change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11211–11216
Chung ES, Soden BJ, Sohn BJ (2010) Revisiting the determination of climate sensitivity from relationships between surface temperature and radiative fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 37:L10703
Colman R (2003) A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Clim Dyn 20:865–873
Dessler AE (2011) Cloud variations and the Earth’s energy budget. Geophys Res Lett 38
Forster PM, Gregory JM (2006) The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget data. J Clim 19:39–52
Frankignoul C (1999) A cautionary note on the use of statistical atmospheric models in the middle latitudes: comments on ‘decadal variability in the North Pacific as simulated by a hybrid coupled model’. J Clim 12:1871–1872
Frankignoul C, Czaja A, L’Heveder B (1998) Air–sea feedback in the North Atlantic and surface boundary conditions for ocean models. J Clim 11:2310–2324
Gregory J, Webb M (2008) Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J Clim 21:58–71
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosci 1:735–743
Lin B, Min Q, Sun W, Hu Y, Fan TF (2011) Can climate sensitivity be estimated from short-term relationships of top-of-atmosphere net radiation and surface temperature? J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 112:177–181
Lindzen RS, Choi YS (2009) On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data. Geophys Res Lett 36:L16705
Lindzen RS, Choi YS (2011) On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 47:377–390
Manabe S, Bryan K, Spelman MJ (1990) Transient response of a global ocean–atmosphere model to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. J Phys Ocean 20:722–749
Murphy DM (2010) Constraining climate sensitivity with linear fits to outgoing radiation. Geophys Res Lett 37:L09704
Roe GH, Baker MB (2007) Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318:629–632
Schwartz ES (2007) Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system. J Geophys Res 112:D24S05
Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J Clim 19:3354–3360
Spencer RW, Braswell WD (2010) On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. J Geophys Res 115:D16109
Spencer RW, Braswell WD (2011) On the misdiagnosis of surface temperature feedbacks from variations in Earth’s radiant energy balance. Remote Sens 3:1603–1613
Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, O’Dell C, Wong T (2010) Relationships between tropical sea surface temperature and top-of-atmosphere radiation. Geophys Res Lett 37:L03702
Wielicki BA, Barkstrom BR, Baum BA, Charlock TP, Green RN, Kratz DP, Lee RB, Minnis P, Smith GL, Wong T, Young DF, The CERES, Team S (1998) Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES): algorithm overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36:1127–1141
Acknowledgement
This study is supported by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under grant CATER 2012–3064 and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (2009-83527).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, YS., Cho, H., Ho, CH. et al. Influence of non-feedback variations of radiation on the determination of climate feedback. Theor Appl Climatol 115, 355–364 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0998-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0998-6