Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Female gender predisposes for cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage in ventriculoperitoneal shunting

  • Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gravitational valves (GVs) prevent overdrainage in ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). However, there are no data available on the appropriate opening pressure in the shunt system when implementing a GV. We performed a retrospective analysis of hydrocephalic patients who were successfully treated with VPS which included one or more GV.

Method

In this retrospective study in adult VPS patients with GVs, we analysed all available data, including the most recent computed tomography (CT) scans, to determine the best adjustments for alleviating any symptoms of overdrainage and underdrainage. Vertical effective opening pressure (VEOP) of the entire shunt system, including the differential pressure valve, was determined.

Results

One hundred and twenty-two patients were eligible for the study. Of these, female patients revealed a higher VEOP compared with males (mean, 35.6 cmH2O [SD ± 2.46] vs 28.9 cmH2O [SD ± 0.87], respectively, p = 0.0072, t-test). In patients older than 60 years, lower VEOPs, by a mean of 6.76 cmH2O ± 2.37 (p = 0.0051), were necessary. Mean VEOP was found to be high in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH; 41.6 cmH2O) and malresorptive and congenital HC (35.9 and 36.3), but low in normal pressure HC (27.5, p = 0.0229; one-way ANOVA). In the total cohort, body mass index (BMI) and height did not correlate with VEOP. Twelve patients required a VEOP of more than 40 cmH2O, and in eight of these patients this was accomplished by using multiple GVs. All but one of these eight patients were of female gender, and none of the latter were treated for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) (p = 0.0044 and p = 0.0032, Fisher’s exact test).

Conclusions

In adult VPS patients, female gender increases the risk of overdrainage requiring higher VEOPs. Initial implantation of adjustable GV should be considered in female patients treated with VP shunts for pathology other than NPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allin DM, Czosnyka ZH, Czosnyka M, Richards HK, Pickard JD (2006) In vitro hydrodynamic properties of the Miethke ProGAV hydrocephalus shunt. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 3:9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergsneider M, Miller C, Vespa PM, Hu X (2008) Surgical management of adult hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 62(Suppl 2):643–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Avezaat CJ, de Jong DA, Gooskens RH, Hermans J (1998) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: randomized comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88:490–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchard C, Despres JP, Mauriege P (1993) Genetic and nongenetic determinants of regional fat distribution. Endocr Rev 14:72–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Browd SR, Gottfried ON, Ragel BT, Kestle JR (2006) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. Pediatr Neurol 34:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buxton N, Punt J (1999) Subtemporal decompression: the treatment of noncompliant ventricle syndrome. Neurosurgery 44:513–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury B, Kvist H, Andersson B, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L (1993) CT-determined changes in adipose tissue distribution during a small weight reduction in obese males. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 17:685–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Pickard JD (2012) Programmable shunt assistant tested in Cambridge shunt evaluation laboratory. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 113:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis SE, Levy ML, McComb JG, Sposto R (2000) The delta valve: how does its clinical performance compare with two other pressure differential valves without antisiphon control? Ped Neurosurg 33:58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Enzi G, Gasparo M, Biondetti PR, Fiore D, Semisa M, Zurlo F (1986) Subcutaneous and visceral fat distribution according to sex, age, and overweight, evaluated by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 44:739–746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freimann FB, Kimura T, Stockhammer F, Schulz M, Rohde V, Thomale UW (2014) In vitro performance and principles of anti-siphoning devices. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:2191–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freimann FB, Luhdo ML, Rohde V, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S, Sprung C (2014) The Frankfurt horizontal plane as a reference for the implantation of gravitational units: a series of 376 adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:1351–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freimann FB, Sprung C (2012) Shunting with gravitational valves—can adjustments end the era of revisions for overdrainage-related events? J Neurosurg 117:1197–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C (2013) Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1982–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gebert AF, Schulz M, Haberl H, Thomale UW (2013) Adjustments in gravitational valves for the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus—a retrospective survey. Childs Nerv Syst 29:2019–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaestner S, Kruschat T, Nitzsche N, Deinsberger W (2009) Gravitational shunt units may cause under-drainage in bedridden patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:217–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kehler U, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Wagner W, Tschan CA, Langer N, Rohde V, Ludwig HC, Gliemroth J, Meier U, Lemcke J, Thomale UW, Fritsch M, Krauss JK, Mirzayan MJ, Schuhmann M, Huthmann A (2015) PROSAIKA: a prospective multicenter registry with the first programmable gravitational device for hydrocephalus shunting. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 137:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiefer M, Antes S, Leonhardt S, Schmitt M, Orakcioglu B, Sakowitz OW, Eymann R (2012) Telemetric ICP measurement with the first CE-approved device: data from animal experiments and initial clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 114:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtom KH, Magram G (2007) Siphon regulatory devices: their role in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Focus 22:E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemcke J, Meier U, Muller C, Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Langer N, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Schuhmann MU, Speil A, Weber F, Remenez V, Rohde V, Ludwig HC, Stengel D (2013) Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:850–857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP (1993) Sex differences in the relation of visceral adipose tissue accumulation to total body fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 58:463–467

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liniger P, Marchand S, Kaiser GL (2003) Flow control versus antisiphon valves: late results concerning slit ventricles and slit-ventricle syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 13(Suppl 1):S3–S6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meier U, Stengel D, Müller C, Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Langer N, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Schuhmann M, Speil A, Weber F, Remenez V, Rohde V, Ludwig H, Lemcke J (2013) Predictors of subsequent over-drainage and clinical outcomes after ventriculo-peritoneal shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 73:1054–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park J, Kim GJ, Hwang SK (2007) Valve inclination influences the performance of gravity-assisted valve. Surg Neurol 68:14–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stockhammer F, Miethke C, Knitter T, Rohde V, Sprung C (2013) Flow-related noise in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt using gravitational adjustable valves. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:761–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tschan CA, Antes S, Huthmann A, Vulcu S, Oertel J, Wagner W (2014) Overcoming CSF overdrainage with the adjustable gravitational valve proSA. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wajchenberg BL (2000) Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev 21:697–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank to Bawarjan Schatlo for helpful comments for preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Stockhammer.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. F.F., C.C., V.R. and F.S. received speaker fees from Braun-Äskulap/Miethke. C.C. received a price endowed by Braun-Äskulap/Miethke

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Comments

In this retrospective study of hydrocephalic patients who were treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) system that included gravitational valves (GV) to prevent overdrainage, the authors introduce a new parameter, the Vertical Effective Opening. Pressure (VEOP). This was calculated as the combined pressure of all valves in the shunt system that is needed to prevent overdrainage and still give a satisfactory CSF drainage. Not so unexpected, the VEOP differed significantly depending on the type of hydrocephalus, with idiopathic intracranial hypertension requiring the highest pressure and normal pressure hydrocephalus the lowest. More interesting is the finding that the female gender appears to require a higher pressure than males to avoid overdrainage. In the authors’ analyses, this gender difference was however found only in the group of patients with high Body Mass Index (BMI); in patients with normal or subnormal BMI, this difference failed to reach statistical significance.

This study may give some valuable advice when it comes to planning of VPS implantation in adults; the authors themselves conclude: “initial implantation of adjustable GVs should be considered in female patients treated with VP shunts for pathology other than NPH”.

As with all new observations, the findings presented here should however be viewed with precaution until verified by another, preferably prospective, study.

Knut Wester

Bergen, Norway

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diesner, N., Freimann, F., Clajus, C. et al. Female gender predisposes for cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage in ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Acta Neurochir 158, 1273–1278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2827-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2827-z

Keywords

Navigation