Skip to main content
Log in

The Frankfurt horizontal plane as a reference for the implantation of gravitational units: a series of 376 adult patients

  • Clinical Article - Pediatrics
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The in-line combination of adjustable differential pressure valves with fixed gravitational units is increasingly recommended in the literature. The spatial positioning of the gravitational unit is thereby decisive for the valve opening pressure. We aimed at providing data on factors contributing to primary overdrainage and underdrainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with special attention paid to the implantation angle of the gravitational unit.

Methods

Weretrospectively analyzed the postoperative course of 376 consecutive patients who received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt with a proGAV valve. The incidence of both primary CSF overdrainage and underdrainage was correlated with the implantation angle of the gravitational unit in regard to the Frankfurt horizontal plane and the patients’ general parameters.

Results

Primary overdrainage was found in 41 (10.9 %) patients. Primary underdrainage was found in 113 (30.1 %) patients. A mean deviation of 10° (±7.8) for the gravitational unit in regard to the vertical line to the Frankfurt horizontal plane was found. In 95 % of the cases the deviation was less than 25°. No significant correlation between the implantation angle and the incidence of overdrainage or underdrainage of CSF was found. The patients’ age and having single hydrocephalus entities were identified as factors significantly predisposing patients to overdrainage or underdrainage.

Conclusion

The implantation of the gravitational unit of the proGAV valve within a range of at least 10° in regard to the vertical line to the Frankfurt horizontal plane does not seem to predispose patients to primary overdrainage or underdrainage in ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The plane may serve as a useful reference for the surgeon’s orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allin DM, Czosnyka ZH, Czosnyka M, Richards HK, Pickard JD (2006) In vitro hydrodynamic properties of the Miethke proGAV hydrocephalus shunt. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 3:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbera AL, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC (2009) An evaluation of head position and craniofacial reference line variation. Homo 60(1):1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browd SR, Gottfried ON, Ragel BT, Kestle JRW (2006) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. Pediatr Neurol 34(3):171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Browd SR, Ragel BT, Gottfried ON, Kestle JRW (2006) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: Obstruction and mechanical failure. Pediatr Neurol 34(2):83–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deininger MH, Weyerbrock A (2009) Gravitational valves in supine patients with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(6):705–709, discussion 709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freimann FB, Sprung C (2012) Shunting with gravitational valves-can adjustments end the era of revisions for overdrainage-related events? J Neurosurg. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS1233

  7. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C (2013) Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.010

  8. Kaestner S, Kruschat T, Nitzsche N, Deinsberger W (2009) Gravitational shunt units may cause under-drainage in bedridden patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(3):217–221, discussion 221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiefer M, Eymann R, Meier U (2002) Five years experience with gravitational shunts in chronic hydrocephalus of adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(8):755–767, discussion 767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leitão P, Nanda RS (2000) Relationship of natural head position to craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 117(4):406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemcke J, Meier U (2010) Improved outcome in shunted iNPH with a combination of a Codman Hakim programmable valve and an Aesculap-Miethke ShuntAssistant. Cent Eur Neurosurg 71(3):113–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemcke J, Meier U, Müller C, Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Langer N, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Schuhmann MU, Speil A, Weber F, Remenez V, Rohde V, Ludwig HC, Stengel D (2013) Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 84(8):850–857

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundström A, Lundström F (1995) The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107(5):537–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen DP, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC (2008) Craniofacial reference plane variation and natural head position. Eur J Orthod 30(5):532–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meier U, Stengel D, Müller C, Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Langer N, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Schuhmann MU, Speil A, Weber F, Remenez V, Rohde V, Ludwig HC, Lemcke J (2013) Predictors of subsequent overdrainage and clinical outcomes after ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 73(6):1054–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park J, Kim G-J, Hwang S-K (2007) Valve inclination influences the performance of gravity-assisted valve. Surg Neurol 68(1):14–18, discussion 18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petricevic N, Celebic A, Celic R, Baucic-Bozic M (2006) Natural head position and inclination of craniofacial planes. Int J Prosthodont 19(3):279–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sprung C, Miethke C, Schlosser H-G, Brock M (2005) The enigma of underdrainage in shunting with hydrostatic valves and possible solutions. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:229–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stockhammer F, Miethke C, Knitter T, Rohde V, Sprung C (2013) Flow-related noise in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt using gravitational adjustable valves. Acta Neurochir (Wien). doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1876-9

  20. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2011) Use of proGAV® shunt valve in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a809

  21. Vienenkötter B, Unterberg A, Aschoff A (2009) Implantation failures and suboptimal positions of gravitational valves - with massive impacts on shunt dysfunction. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 6(Suppl 2):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

FBF, MLL, VR, PV, and SW have no conflicts of interest to disclose. CS is supported by Aesculap AG to deliver presentations at scientific meetings but has no financial interest in the product this article discusses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Baptist Freimann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freimann, F.B., Luhdo, ML., Rohde, V. et al. The Frankfurt horizontal plane as a reference for the implantation of gravitational units: a series of 376 adult patients. Acta Neurochir 156, 1351–1356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2076-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2076-y

Keywords

Navigation