Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We thank you for the opportunity for commenting on the letter by Ascerbi and co-workers. We feel the discussions surrounding fluorescence stimulating and interesting.
Our first experience with fluorescein was in 1991 when we used fluorescein for marking perilesional edema in the cortical cold lesion model [21]. We demonstrated fluorescein propagating through the brain, driven by edema in the absence of tumor. Thus, to us fluorescein has always been an excellent edema marker.
Similarly, when first using fluorescein for brain tumor surgery Moore et al. (1948) [17] noted that “edematous brain surrounding the tumor does fluoresce, but to a lesser degree …”
Since then, investigators have taken up this technology on and off, e.g., Kuoriwa and co-workers [11–13] for brain tumor surgery. This group, incidentally, gave up fluorescein in 1999, later pursuing ALA intensely [6–10, 15, 16, 22–24].
Currently, due to the availability of new filter systems, investigators have again adopted fluorescein for malignant gliomas. Anybody interested in the present use of this technique should appraise footage from fluorescein surgery on the internet (e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mST6oPE69dE and http://abcnews.go.com/Health/making-brain-tumors-glow-saves-lives/story?id=17076243#) and draw their own conclusions.
Nonetheless, filters will not change biology and fluorescein will still only mark areas of the brain with blood–brain barrier breakdown, which are somewhat but not strictly related to tumor. Novel experimental work has confirmed fluorescein staining to not be tumor-cell specific [5]. Extravasation and propagation of fluorescein with edema will follow a distinctive time course: after administration, levels will be high in blood and perfused tissues, blood and CSF. With a half-life of 264 min, intravascular fluorescein will slowly subside, in the mean time being extravasated with edema and travelling through peritumoral tissue, raising the danger of staining non-tumorous brain. Thus, the timing of surgery will be critical. The second problem arises from surgical tissue injury. Any injury to the tissue will result in extravasation of fluorescein at the cut margin and any other areas of tissue injury. Fluorescein in blood will stain such injured tissues. None of the authors currently reporting on fluorescein discuss this much, although these phenomena are clearly visible in images from their publications (e.g., Fig. 1 in Ascerbi et al. 2014 [1]; Fig. 3e, f in Li et al. 2014 [14]; Fig. 3b in Schebesch et al. 2013 [20]; Fig. 1e in Rey-Dios and Cohen-Gadol et al. (2013) [19]; Fig. 7c in Diaz et al. 2015 [5]; Fig. 4b in Okuda et al. (2012) [18]), where parts of the margin of the cavity and/or the surrounding cortical tissues are stained after completion of tumor removal. Why didn’t the authors continue resection in these areas with clearly visible fluorescence?
Together, timing and dose appear to be essential, as Ascerbi et al. acknowledge in their letter, but there does not appear to be much consensus among current investigators regarding these two aspects (Table 1). Ascerbi et al. suggest 5 mg/kg to be administered i.v. after intubation, i.e., approximately 1 h prior to dural opening. What happens when craniotomies take longer or the tumor is large or when craniotomies are fast and the tumors small? In no publication so far is the temporal aspect accounted for when regarding fluorescence in the later stages of resection and its influence on diagnostic accuracy.
What we are simply saying here is that fluorescein is not well investigated at this point and harbors a number of pitfalls and hazards to justify too much enthusiasm. Frankly, surgeons should be wary.
Surgical studies are tricky and the possibilities for advertent or inadvertent bias numerous. Especially in studies on intraoperative optical diagnosis, calculations of specificity and sensitivity are highly influenced by sample location and number of samples per patient. Thus, a high level of transparency and control are necessary for such investigations, including exact and objective description of how many biopsies were taken, exactly from where and how a per-patient analysis compared with a per-biopsy analysis (problematical mixing of dependent and independent data) are handled. In addition, publications should strictly adhere to the STARD statement [3] for studies on diagnostic accuracy. It is not apparent that this is happening to a satisfactory extent in available reports on the clinical use of fluorescein (Table 1). Clinical studies within a proper GCP setting, including pre-defined study aims, biometry and external monitoring would be more than welcome at this time.
References
Acerbi F, Broggi M, Eoli M, Anghileri E, Cavallo C, Boffano C, Cordella R, Cuppini L, Pollo B, Schiariti M, Visintini S, Orsi C, La Corte E, Broggi G, Ferroli P (2014) Is fluorescein-guided technique able to help in resection of high-grade gliomas? Neurosurg Focus 36: E5
Acerbi F, Broggi M, Eoli M, Anghileri E, Cuppini L, Pollo B, Schiariti M, Visintini S, Ori C, Franzini A, Broggi G, Ferroli P (2013) Fluorescein-guided surgery for grade IV gliomas with a dedicated filter on the surgical microscope: preliminary results in 12 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:1277–1286
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC (2003) Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem 49:1–6
Chen B, Wang H, Ge P, Zhao J, Li W, Gu H, Wang G, Luo Y, Chen D (2012) Gross total resection of glioma with the intraoperative fluorescence-guidance of fluorescein sodium. Int J Med Sci 9:708–714
Diaz RJ, Dios RR, Hattab EM, Burrell K, Rakopoulos P, Sabha N, Hawkins C, Zadeh G, Rutka JT, Cohen-Gadol AA (2015) Study of the biodistribution of fluorescein in glioma-infiltrated mouse brain and histopathological correlation of intraoperative findings in high-grade gliomas resected under fluorescein fluorescence guidance. J Neurosurg 3:1–10
Inoue H, Kajimoto Y, Shibata MA, Miyoshi N, Ogawa N, Miyatake S, Otsuki Y, Kuroiwa T (2007) Massive apoptotic cell death of human glioma cells via a mitochondrial pathway following 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy. J Neurooncol 83:223–231
Ishikawa T, Kajimoto Y, Inoue Y, Ikegami Y, Kuroiwa T (2015) Critical role of ABCG2 in ALA-photodynamic diagnosis and therapy of human brain tumor. Adv Cancer Res 125:197–216
Ishikawa T, Kajimoto Y, Sun W, Nakagawa H, Inoue Y, Ikegami Y, Miyatake S, Kuroiwa T (2013) Role of Nrf2 in cancer photodynamic therapy: regulation of human ABC transporter ABCG2. J Pharm Sci 102:3058–3069
Ishikawa T, Takahashi K, Ikeda N, Kajimoto Y, Hagiya Y, Ogura S, Miyatake S, Kuroiwa T (2011) Transporter-mediated drug interaction strategy for 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic diagnosis of malignant brain tumor: molecular design of ABCG2 inhibitors. Pharmaceutics 3:615–635
Kajimoto Y, Kuroiwa T, Miyatake S, Ichioka T, Miyashita M, Tanaka H, Tsuji M (2007) Use of 5-aminolevulinic acid in fluorescence-guided resection of meningioma with high risk of recurrence. Case report. J Neurosurg 106:1070–1074
Kuroiwa T, Kajimoto Y, Ohta T (1999) Comparison between operative findings on malignant glioma by a fluorescein surgical microscopy and histological findings. Neurol Res 21:130–134
Kuroiwa T, Kajimoto Y, Ohta T (1999) Surgical management for supratentorial astrocytic tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42:182–186
Kuroiwa T, Kajimoto Y, Ohta T (1998) Development of a fluorescein operative microscope for use during malignant glioma surgery: a technical note and preliminary report. Surg Neurol 50:41–48
Li Y, Rey-Dios R, Roberts DW, Valdés PA, Cohen-Gadol AA (2014) Intraoperative fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade gliomas: a comparison of the present techniques and evolution of future strategies. World Neurosurg 82:175–185
Masubuchi T, Kajimoto Y, Kawabata S, Nonoguchi N, Fujishiro T, Miyatake S, Kuroiwa T (2013) Experimental study to understand nonspecific protoporphyrin IX fluorescence in brain tissues near tumors after 5-aminolevulinic acid administration. Photomed Laser Surg 31:428–433
Miyatake S, Kajimoto Y, Kuroiwa T (2009) Intraoperative photo-dynamic diagnosis of brain tumors. Brain Nerve 61:835–842
Moore GE, Peyton WT, French LA, Walker WW (1948) The clinical use of fluorescein in neurosurgery; the localization of brain tumors. J Neurosurg 5:392–398
Okuda T, Yoshioka H, Kato A (2012) Fluorescence-guided surgery for glioblastoma multiforme using high-dose fluorescein sodium with excitation and barrier filters. J Clin Neurosci 19:1719–1722
Rey-Dios R, Cohen-Gadol AA (2013) Technical principles and neurosurgical applications of fluorescein fluorescence using a microscope-integrated fluorescence module. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:701–706
Schebesch KM, Proescholdt M, Höhne J, Hohenberger C, Hansen E, Reimenschneider MJ, Ullrich W, Doenitz C, Schlair J, Lange M, Brawanski A (2013) Sodium fluorescein-guided resection under the YELLOW 560 nm surgical microscope filter in malignant brain tumor surgery—a feasibility study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:693–699
Stummer W, Götz C, Hassan A, Heimann A, Kempski O (1993) Kinetics of photofrin II in perifocal brain edema. Neurosurgery 33:1075–1081
Sun W, Kajimoto Y, Inoue H, Miyatake S, Ishikawa T, Kuroiwa T (2013) Gefitinib enhances the efficacy of photodynamic therapy using 5-aminolevulinic acid in malignant brain tumor cells. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 10:42–50
Takahashi K, Ikeda N, Nonoguchi N, Kajimoto Y, Miyatake S, Hagiya Y, Ogura S, Nakagawa H, Ishikawa T, Kuroiwa T (2011) Enhanced expression of coproporphyrinogen oxidase in malignant brain tumors: CPOX expression and 5-ALA-induced fluorescence. Neuro Oncol 13:1234–1243
Tamura Y, Kuroiwa T, Kajimoto Y, Miki Y, Miyatake S, Tsuji M (2007) Endoscopic identification and biopsy sampling of an intraventricular malignant glioma using a 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence imaging system. Technical note. J Neurosurg 106:507–510
Conflict of interest
Walter Stummer has received consultant fees from medac, Wedel, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Stummer, W. Poor man’s fluorescence?. Acta Neurochir 157, 1379–1381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2471-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2471-z