Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the level-set method to a mixed-mode driven Stefan problem in 2\(D\) and 3\(D\)

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focusses on the growth of small precipitates within a matrix phase (see also den Ouden et al., Comput Mater Sci 50:2397–2410, 2011). The growth of a precipitate is assumed to be affected by the concentration gradients of a single chemical element within the matrix phase at the precipitate/matrix boundary and by an interface reaction, resulting into a mixed-mode formulation of the boundary condition on the precipitate/matrix interface. Within the matrix phase we assume that the standard diffusion equation applies to the concentration of the considered chemical element. The formulated Stefan problem is solved using a level-set method (J Comput Phys 79:12–49, 1988) by introducing a time-dependent signed-distance function for which the zero level-set describes the precipitate/matrix interface. All appearing hyperbolic partial differential equations are discretised by the use of Streamline-Upwind Petrov–Galerkin finite-element techniques (Comput Vis Sci 3:93–101, 2000). All level-set related equations are solved on a background mesh, which is enriched with interface nodes located on the zero-level of the signed-distance function. The diffusion equation is solved in the diffusive phase. Simulations with the implemented methods for the growth of various precipitate shapes show that the methods employed in this study correctly capture the evolution of the precipitate/matrix interface including topological changes. At the final stage of growth/dissolution physical equilibrium is attained. We also observe that our solutions show mass conservation as the time-step and element-size tend to zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The \(\pm \) symbol represents the fact that the points in the set \(\mathcal{X }^{\pm }\) come from an edge over which \(\mathbf{\phi }(t^{n})\) changes sign.

References

  1. Andersson JO, Helander T, Höglund L, Shi P, Sundman B (2002) Thermo-Calc and DICTRA, computational tools for materials science. Calphad 26:273–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Merriman B, Osher S, Smereka P (1997) A simple level set method for solving Stefan problems. J Comput Phys 135:8–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H (1928) Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik. Math Ann 100:32–74

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problems. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Deschamps A, Brechet Y (1999) Influence of predeformation and ageing of an Al–Zn–Mg Alloy—II. Modeling of precipitation kinetics and yield stress. Acta Mater 47:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu S, Henager CH Jr (2009) Phase-field simulations of Te-precipitate morphology and evolution kinetics in Te-rich CdTe crystals. J Crystal Growth 311:3184–3194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Javierre E, Vuik C, Vermolen FJ, Segal A (2007) A level set method for three dimensional vector Stefan problems: dissolution of stoichiometric particles in multi-component alloys. J Comput Phys 224:222–240

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kampmann R, Wagner R (1991) Materials science and technology—a comprehensive treatment, vol 5. VCH, Weinheim

  9. Mullins WW, Sekerka RF (1963) Morphological stability of a particle growing by diffusion or heat flow. J Appl Phys 34:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Osher SJ, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79:12–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Osher SJ, Fedkiw RP (2002) Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces, 1st edn. Springer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  12. den Ouden D, Vermolen FJ, Zhao L, Vuik C, Sietsma J (2011) Modelling of precipitate nucleation and growth in binary alloys under elastic deformation: an application to a Cu-0.95%Co alloy. Comput Mater Sci 50:2397–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez M (2005) Gibbs–Thomson effects in phase transformations. Scr Mater 52:709–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Porter DA, Easterling KE (1992) Phase transformations in metals and alloys, 2nd edn. Chapmann and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robson JD (2004) Modelling the evolution of precipitate size distribution during nucleation, growth and coarsening. Mater Sci Technol 20:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Segal A, Vuik C, Vermolen FJ (1998) A conserving discretization for the free boundary in a two-dimensional Stefan problem. J Comput Phys 141:1–21

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Segal A (2009) Sepran introduction. Ingenieursbureau SEPRA. Den Haag, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sethian JA (1999) Fast marching methods. SIAM Rev 41:199–235

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Soisson F, Barbu A, Martin G (1996) Monte Carlo simulation of copper precipitation in dilute iron–copper alloys during thermal ageing and under electron radiation. Acta Mater 44:3789–3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher SJ (1994) A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J Comput Phys 114:146–159

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Tornberg AK, Engquist B (2000) A finite element based level-set method for multiphase flow applications. Comput Vis Sci 3:93–101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Vermolen FJ (2007) On similarity solutions and interface reactions for a vector-valued Stefan problem. Nonlinear Anal Model Control 12:269–288

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vermolen FJ, Javierre E, Vuik C, Zhao L, van der Zwaag S (2007) A three-dimensional model for precipitate dissolution in binary alloys. Comput Mater Sci 39:767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zener C (1949) Theory of growth of spherical precipitates from solid solution. J Appl Phys 20:950–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out under the project number M41.5.09341 in the framework of the Research Program of the Materials innovation institute M2i (http://www.m2i.nl).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. den Ouden.

Additional information

In memory of our late colleague Jeroen Colijn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

den Ouden, D., Segal, A., Vermolen, F.J. et al. Application of the level-set method to a mixed-mode driven Stefan problem in 2\(D\) and 3\(D\) . Computing 95 (Suppl 1), 553–572 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0247-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0247-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation