Abstract
There are many factors affecting submarine groundwater discharge (SGD). However, systematic study of the influences of these factors is still limited. In this study, numerical modeling is performed to quantitatively explore the influences of various factors on SGD in a coastal aquifer. In such locations, tidal and terrestrial hydraulic gradients are the primary forces driving fresh and salt water movement. Unlike steady-state flow, dynamic fresh and salt water mixing at the near-shore seafloor may form an intertidal mixing zone (IMZ) near the surface. By constructing a general SGD model, the effects of various model components such as boundary conditions, model geometry and hydraulic parameters are systematically studied. Several important findings are obtained from the study results: (1) Previous studies have indicated there will be a freshwater discharge tube between the classic transition zone and the IMZ. However, this phenomenon may become unclear with the increase of heterogeneity and anisotropy of the medium’s conductivity field. (2) SGD and IMZ are both more sensitive to the vertical anisotropy ratio of hydraulic conductivity (Kx/Kz) than to the horizontal ratio (Kx/Ky). (3) Heterogeneity of effective porosity significantly affects SGD and IMZ. (4) Increase of the storage coefficient decreases fresh water discharge but increases mixing salt water discharge and total SGD. The increase will also change the shape of the IMZ. (5) Variation of dispersivities does not affect SGD, but significantly changes the distributions of the IMZ and the whole mixing zone. These findings will be helpful to the sampling design of field studies of SGD and to the application of dynamic SGD models to field sites for model development and calibration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abarca E, Carrera J, Sanchez-Vila X, Dentz M (2007) Anisotropic dispersive Henry problem. Adv Water Resour 30:913–926
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Volker RE, Lockington DA (1999) Tidal effects on sea water intrusion in unconfined aquifers. J Hydrol 216:17–31
Bakker M (2003) A Dupuit formulation for modeling seawater intrusion in regional aquifer system. Water Resour Res 39(5):1131
Barrash W, Reboulet EC (2004) Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textual composition in subsurface coarse fluvial deposits, Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site. Geol Soc Am Bull. doi:10.1130/B25370.1
Bear J (1999) Mathematical modeling of seawater intrusion. In: Bear J et al (eds) Seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, pp 127–161
Bokuniewicz H (2001) Toward a costal ground-water typology. J Sea Res 46:99–108
Boufadel MC (2000) A mechanistic study of nonlinear solute transport in a groundwater-surface water system under steady state and transient hydraulic conditions. Water Resour Res 36(9):2549–2565
Burnett WC, Bokuniewicz H, Huettel M, Moore WS, Taniguchi M (2003) Groundwater and pore water inputs to the coastal zone. Biogeochemistry 66(1–2):3–33
Burnett WC, Aggarwal PK, Aureli A, Bokuniewicz H, Cable JE, Charette MA, Kontar E, Krupa S, Kulkarni KM, Loveless A, Moore WS, Oberdorfer JA, Oliveira J, Ozyurt N, Povinec P, Privitera AM, Rajar R, Ramessur RT, Scholten J, Stieglitz T, Taniguchi M, Turner JV (2006) Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods. Sci Total Environ 367(2–3):498–543
Clarke RH (1979) Reservoir properties of conglomerates and conglomeratic sandstones. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 63(5):799–809
de Marsily G (1996) Quantitative hydrogeology: groundwater hydrology for engineer. Academic Press, Orlando
Destouni G, Prieto C (2003) On the possibility for generic modeling of submarine groundwater discharge. Biogeochemistry 66:171–186
Diersch H-JG, Kolditz O (2002) Variable-density flow and transport in porous media: approaches and challenges. Adv Water Resour 25(8–12):899–944
Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR (1992) A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 28(7):1974–1995
Guo W, Langevin CD (2002) User’s guide to SEAWAT: A computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, chapter A7
Holliday D, Stieglitz TC, Ridd PV, Read WW (2007) Geological controls and tidal forcing of submarine groundwater discharge from a confined aquifer in a coastal sand dune system. J Geophys Res 112:C04015
Hu BX, He C (2006) Using sequential self-calibration method to estimate a correlation length of a log-conductivity field conditioned upon a tracer test and limited measured data. J Stoc Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-006-0046-5
Hu BX, Meerschaert MM, Barrash W, Hyndman DW, He C, Li X, Guo L (2009) Examining the influence of heterogeneous porosity fields on conservative solute transport. J Contam Hydrol 108:77–88
Hughes CE (2005) Comparison of empirical relationships for hydraulic conductivity using grain size distribution, packing, and porosity information from the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho: MS Thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID
Johnson AI (1967) Specific yield—compilation of specific yields for various materials. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1662-D
Langevin CD (2003) Simulation of submarine ground water discharge to a marine estuary: Biscayne Bay, Florida. Ground Water 41(6):758–771
Langevin CD, Shoemaker WB, Guo W (2003) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model–documentation of the SEAWAT-2000 version with the Variable-Density Flow process (VDF) and the Integrated MT3DMS Transport process (IMT). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-426
Li X, Hu BX (2013) Proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model for mass transport. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 11:1256–1276
Li L, Barry DA, Pattiaratchi CB (1997) Numerical modeling of tide-induced beach water table fluctuations. Coast Eng 30(1–2):105–123
Li L, Barry DA, Stagnitti F, Parlange I-Y (1999) Submarine groundwater discharge and associated chemical input to a coastal sea. Water Resour Res 35(11):3253–3259
Li X, Hu BX, Burnett WC, Santos IR, Chanton JP (2009) Submarine ground water discharge driven by tidal pumping in a heterogeneous aquifer. Ground Water 47(4):558–568
Mao X, Enot P, Barry DA, Li L, Binley A, Jeng D-S (2006) Tidal influence on behavior of a coastal aquifer adjacent to a low-relief estuary. J Hydrol 327(1–2):110–127
Martin JB, Cable JE, Swarzenski PW, Lindenberg MK (2004) Enhanced submarine ground water discharge from mixing of pore water and estuarine water. Ground Water 42(7):1000–1010
Martin JB, Cable JE, Smith C, Roy M, Cherrier J (2007) Magnitudes of submarine groundwater discharge from marine and terrestrial sources: Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Water Resour Res 43(5):W05440
Michael HA, Mulligan AE, Harvey CF (2005) Seasonal oscillations in water exchange between aquifers and the coastal ocean. Nature 436(25):1145–1148
Moore WS (1996) Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by 226Ra enrichments. Nature 380(6576):612–614
Mulligan AE, Charrtte MA (2006) Intercomparison of submarine groundwater discharge estimates from a sandy unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 327(3–4):411–425
Nielsen P (1990) Tidal dynamics of the water table in beaches. Water Resour Res 26(9):2127–2134
Prieto C, Destouni G (2005) Quantifying hydrological and tidal influences on groundwater discharges into coastal waters. Water Resour Res 41(12):W12427
Robinson C, Li L, Barry DA (2007a) Effect of tidal forcing on a subterranean estuary. Adv Water Resour 30(4):851–865
Robinson C, Li L, Prommer H (2007b) Tide-induced recirculation across the aquifer-ocean interface. Water Resour Res 43(7):W07428
Santos IR, Burnett WC, Chanton J, Suryaputra B, Dittma T (2008) Nutrient biogeochemistry in a Gulf of Mexico subterranean estuary and groundwater-derived fluxes to the coastal ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2):705–718
Schincariol RA, Schwartz FW (1990) An experimental investigation of variable density flow homogeneous and heterogeneous media. Water Resour Res 26(10):2317–2329
Schincariol RA, Schwartz FW, Mendoza CA (1997) Instabilities in variable density flows: stability and sensitivity analyses for homogeneous and heterogeneous media. Water Resour Res 33(1):31–41
Shikaze SG, Sudicky EA, Schwartz FW (1998) Density-dependent solute transport in discretely-fractured geologic media: is prediction possible? J Contam Hydrol 34(3):273–291
Shoemaker WB (2004) Important observations and parameters for a salt water intrusion model. Ground Water 42(6):829–840
Simmons GM Jr (1992) Importance of submarine groundwater discharge (SGWD) and seawater cycling to material flux across sediments/water interfaces in marine environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 84:173–184
Simmons CT, Fenstemaker TR, Sharp JM (2001) Variable-density groundwater flow and solute transport in heterogeneous porous media: approaches, resolutions and future challenges. J Contam Hydrol 52(1–4):245–275
Smith AJ (2004) Mixed convection and density-dependent seawater circulation in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 40(8):W08309
Song Z, Li L, Nielsen P, Lockington D (2006) Quantification of tidal watertable overheight in a coastal unconfined aquifer. J Eng Math 56(4):437–444
Spiteri C (2007) Reactive transport modeling of biogeochemical dynamics in subterranean estuaries: Implications for submarine groundwater discharge of nutrients. Doctoral thesis, Utrecht University
Taniguchi M, Burnett WC, Cable JE, Turner JV (2002) Investigation of submarine groundwater discharge. Hydrol Process 16(11):2115–2129
Taniguchi M, Ishitobi T, Shimada J (2006) Dynamics of submarine groundwater discharge and freshwater-seawater interface. J Geophys Res 111:C01008
Thompson C, Smith L, Maji R (2007) Hydrogeological modeling of submarine groundwater discharge on the continental shelf of Louisiana. J Geophys Res 112:C03014
Tong J, Hu BX, Yang J (2011) Assimilating transient groundwater flow data via a localized ensemble Kalman filter to calibrate a heterogeneous conductivity field. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-011-0534-0
Voss CI, Provost AM (2002) SUTRA: A model for saturated-unsaturated, variable-density ground-water flow with solute or energy transport. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4231
Wu J, Hu BX (2006) Numerical method of moments for solute transport in nonstationary flow fields conditioning on measurements of hydraulic conductivity and head. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-006-0078-x
Acknowledgments
This research is partly supported by the U.S. Department of Defense, through the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), Project SI-1700 and partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91125024) and China Geological Survey Bureau (Contract No. D21365). Discussion with Professor William C. Burnett, Ming Ye, Jeff Chanton and Joseph F. Donoghue, from the Florida State University throughout the duration of this study are greatly appreciated. We are also grateful to technical help of Lynn Rauchenstein from Pacific Northwest National Lab.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Hu, B.X. & Tong, J. Numerical study on tide-driven submarine groundwater discharge and seawater recirculation in heterogeneous aquifers. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 1741–1755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1200-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1200-8