Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An inexact inventory-theory-based chance-constrained programming model for solid waste management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an inexact inventory-theory-based chance-constrained programming (IICP) model is proposed for planning waste management systems. The IICP model is derived through introducing inventory theory model into a general inexact chance-constrained programming framework. It can not only tackle uncertainties presented as both probability distributions and discrete intervals, but also reflect the influence of inventory problem in decision-making problems. The developed method is applied to a case study of long-term municipal solid waste (MSW) management planning. Solutions of total waste allocation, waste allocation batch and waste transferring period associated different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. The results can be used to identify inventory-based MSW management planning with minimum system cost under various constraint-violation risks. Compared with the ICP model, the developed IICP model can more actually reflect the complexity of MSW management systems and provide more useful information for decision makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai YP, Huang GH, Nie XH, Li YP, Tan Q (2007) Municipal solid waste management under uncertainty: a mixed interval parameter fuzzy-stochastic robust programming approach. Environ Eng Sci 24(3):338–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai YP, Huang GH, Lu HW, Yang ZF, Tan Q (2009) I-VFRP: an interval-valued fuzzy robust programming approach for municipal waste-management planning under uncertainty. Eng Optim 41(5):399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanas S, Zielinski P (2000) On the equivalence of two optimization methods for fuzzy linear programming problems. Eur J Oper Res 121(1):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Davila E (2007) Minimax regret optimization analysis for a regional solid waste management system. Waste Manage 27(6):820–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Wang SF (1997) A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems. Eur J Oper Res 99(2):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manage Sci 6(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Kirby P (1972) Chance constrained programming: an extension of statistical method. In: Hauser P (ed) Optimizing methods in statistics. Academic, New York, pp 391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GH, Huang GH, Li YP, Cao MF, Fan YR (2009) Planning of municipal solid waste management systems under dual uncertainties: a hybrid interval stochastic programming approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(6):707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EI Saadany AMA, Jaber MY (2010) A production/remanufacturing inventory model with price and quality dependent return rate. Comput Ind Eng 58(3):352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu JJ, Guo P, Huang GH, Shen N (2013) Optimization of the industrial structure facing sustainable development in resource-based city subjected to water resources under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(3):659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH (2009) Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming-application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(3):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH, Li YP (2008) Interval stochastic quadratic programming approach for municipal solid waste management. Environ Eng Sci 7(6):569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley G, Whitin TM (1963) Analysis of inventory systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeman L, Jose MP, Ignacio EG, Sunwon P (1996) Mixed-integer linear programming model for refinery short-term scheduling of crude oil unloading with inventory management. Ind Eng Chem Res 35(5):1630–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ (2001) Introduction to operations research, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Huang GH, Sun W, Li YP (2013) Inexact quadratic joint-probabilistic programming for water quality management under uncertainty in the Xiangxi River, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(5):1115–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH (1998) A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model. Eur J Oper Res 107(1):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Cao MF (2011) Analysis of solution methods for interval linear programming. J Environ Inf 17(2):54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1992) An interval linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 9(4):319–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1993) A grey fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 10(2):123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1994) Grey dynamic programming (GDP) for solid waste management planning under uncertainty. J Urb Plan D-ASCE 120(3):120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995a) Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 83(3):594–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995b) Grey fuzzy integer programming: an application to regional waste management planning under uncertainty. Socio-Eco Plan Sci 29(1):17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995c) Grey quadratic programming and its application to municipal waste management planning under uncertainty. Eng Optim 23(3):201–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Sae-Lim N, Liu L, Chen Z (2001) An interval-parameter fuzzy-stochastic programming approach for municipal solid waste management and planning. Environ Model Assess 6(4):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Chi GF, Li YP (2005a) Long-term planning of an integrated solid waste management system under uncertainty-I. Model development. Environ Eng Sci 22(6):823–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Chi GF, Li YP (2005b) Long-term planning of an integrated solid waste management system under uncertainty-II. A north American case study. Environ Eng Sci 22(6):835–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi M, Ichihashi H, Tanaka H (1990) Fuzzy programming: a survey of recent developments. In: Slowinski R, Teghem J (eds) Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 45–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kar S, Roy TK, Maiti M (1999) Fuzzy multi-deteriorating items E.O.Q. model with price dependent under budgetary constraint. Adv Model Anal 19:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukreja A, Schmidt CP (2005) A model for lumpy demand parts in a multi-location inventory system with transshipments. Comput Oper Res 32(8):2059–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH (2006a) An inexact two-stage mixed integer linear programming method for solid waste management in the City of Regina. J Environ Manage 81(3):188–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH (2006b) Minimax regret analysis for municipal solid waste management: an interval-stochastic programming approach. J Air Waste Manage 56(7):931–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Nie SL, Qin XS (2007) ITCLP: an inexact two-stage chance-constrained program for planning waste management systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 49(3):284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Chen X (2009) Multistage scenario-based inexact-stochastic programming for planning water resources allocation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(6):781–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LINGO (2011) Linear, Integer, Nonlinear and Global Optimization Package, Release 13.0. Lindo Systems Inc., Chicago. http://www.lindo.com

  • Liu ZF, Huang GH, Liao RF, He L (2009) DIPIP: dual interval probabilistic integer programming for solid waste management. J Environ Inf 14(1):66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti AK, Maiti MK, Maiti M (2009) Inventory model with stochastic lead-time and price dependent demand incorporating advance payment. Appl Math Model 33(5):2433–2443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH (2003) A two-stage intervalstochastic programming model for waste management under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53(5):540–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller BL, Wagner HW (1965) Chance constrained programming with joint constraints. Oper Res 13(6):930–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porras E, Dekker R (2008) An inventory control system for spare parts at a refinery: an empirical comparison of different re-order point methods. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):101–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian SD et al (2005) Operations research, 3rd edn. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp 347–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt A, Snyder LV, Shen ZM (2010) Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: properties and approximations. Eur J Oper Res 206(2):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li YP, Huang GH (2010) Development of a fuzzy-queue-based interval linear programming model for municipal solid waste management. Environ Eng Scene 27(6):451–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Huang GH, Lv Y, Li GC (2013) Inexact joint-probabilistic chance-constrained programming with left-hand-side randomness: an application to solid waste management. Eur J Oper Res 228(1):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suo MQ, Li YP, Huang GH (2011) An inventory-theory-based interval-parameter two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management. Eng Optim 43(9):999–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Q, Huang GH, Cai YP (2010) Identification of optimal plans for municipal solid waste management in an environment of fuzziness and two-layer randomness. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24(1):147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urgeletti TG (1983) Inventory control models and problems. Eur J Oper Res 14:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain TR, Smart CN, Schwarz HF (2004) A new approach to forecasting intermittent demand in manufacturing: acomparative evaluation of Croston’s method. Int J Forecast 10(4):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu RN, Zhai XY (2010) Analysis of supply chain coordination under fuzzy demand in a two-stage supply chain. Appl Math Model 34(1):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Huang Y (2009a) SRFILP: a stochastic robust fuzzy interval linear programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. J Environ Inf 14(2):72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS (2009b) Inexact two-stage stochastic robust optimization model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environ Eng Sci 26(12):1765–1776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS (2010) An inexact fuzzy-chance-constrained air quality management model. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60(7):805–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zare Y, Daneshmand A (1995) A linear approximation method for solving a special class of the chance constrained programming problem. Eur J Oper Res 80(1):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Trauth KM (2005) Internet-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision support system for planning integrated solid waste management. J Environ Inf 6(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YM, Huang GH, He L (2011) An inexact reverse logistics model for municipal solid waste management systems. J Environ Manage 92(3):522–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Huang GH (2011) SLFP: a stochastic linear fractional programming approach for sustainable waste management. Waste Manage 31(12):2612–2619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51309095), the Program for Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1127), the 111 Project (B14008) and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuoHe Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Huang, G., Suo, M. et al. An inexact inventory-theory-based chance-constrained programming model for solid waste management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28, 1939–1955 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0936-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0936-x

Keywords

Navigation