Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influences of topographic index distribution on hydrologically sensitive areas in agricultural watershed

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hydrologically sensitive area (HSA) is an area with a very quick response to runoff and higher surface runoff probability since all watersheds are prone to generate runoff in one way or the other. The accurate description of runoff generation in time and space has important practical significance for land use and watershed management. The aim of this article was to establish HSAs identification method based on topographic index, and to estimate the spatio-temporal variability of surface runoff probability in different periods. The sensitive month was defined using critical monthly surface runoff probability combined with topographic index. Then the corresponding spatial and temporal boundary of HSA was estimated by the relation of average annual runoff and topographic index. The presented approach was applied in Meishan watershed, which is humid in the summer and has a monsoon climate. The analysis results indicated the probably sensitive months are from February to October with spatial topographic index distribution ranging from 13.02 to 17.13. April–October was estimated as seasonal HSAs with topographic index ranging from 9.21 to 14.05. In addition, the inter-annual variability of seasonal HSAs is much greater and the critical topographic index is 9.21 in July.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew LJ, Lyon S, Gérard-Marchant P et al (2006) Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: bridging the gap between science and application. J Environ Manage 78:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci J 24:43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughton WC (1990) Systematic procedure for evaluating partial areas of watershed runoff [J]. J Irrig Drain Eng 116(1):83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ES, Boll J, Mcdaniel PA (2007) Distributed and integrated response of a geographic information system-based hydrologic model in the eastern Palouse region, Idaho. Hydrol Process 21:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang YC, Liaw SC, Jan JF, Hwong JL (2008) Dynamic change of hydrologically sensitive areas in the Lien-Hwa-Chi watersheds. J Geogr Sci 51:21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean S, Freer J, Beve K et al (2009) Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:991–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Black RD (1970) Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed. Water Resour Res 6(5):1296–1311

  • He L et al (2012) Application of loosely coupled watershed model and channel model in Yellow River, China. J Environ Inform 19(1):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong FZ, Rui XF (2003) Calculation method for the topographic index in TOPMODEL. Adv Water Sci 14:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon SW, Walter MT, Gérard-Marchant P et al (2004) Using a topographic index to distribute variable source area runoff predicted with the SCS curve-number equation. Hydrol Process 18:2757–2771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman EM, Steenhuis TS, Thongs DJ et al (2007) Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a curve-number-based watershed model. Hydrol Process 21:3420–3430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter MT, Walter MF, Brooks ES et al (2000) Hydrological sensitive areas: variable source area hydrology implications for water quality risk assessment. J Soil Water Conserv 55:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, McCabe GJ (1995) Comparison of single and multiple flow direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters in TOPMODEL. Water Resour Res 31:1315–1324

  • Yong B, Zhang WC, Chen YH (2007) A new algorithm of the topographic index ln(α/tanβ) in TOPMODEL and its resultant analysis. Geogr Research 26:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JN, Huang Y (2002) Studies on the water quality evaluation in the hydrological sensitive areas in America. Sci Tech Inform Soil Water Conserv 4:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Xia J, Shao QX (2013) Water quantity and quality simulation by improved SWAT in highly regulated Huai River Basin of China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:11–27. doi:10.1007/s00477-011-0546-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Scientific Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 41371052,U1203282, No. 51269026) and sponsored by Qing Lan Project. The authors are very grateful to the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lianqing Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, L., Bao, R., Meixner, T. et al. Influences of topographic index distribution on hydrologically sensitive areas in agricultural watershed. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28, 2235–2242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0925-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0925-0

Keywords

Navigation