Skip to main content
Log in

Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergency risk management (ERM) is a process which involves dealing with risks to the community arising from emergency events. Emergency management evaluation as one of the important parts of ERM aims assessing and improving social preparedness and organizational ability in identifying, analyzing, and treating emergency risks. This study first develops an emergency management evaluation model. It then proposes an extended fuzzy multi-criteria group evaluation method, which can deal with both subjective and objective criteria under multi-levels by a group of evaluators, for emergency management evaluation. A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system (FMCGDSS) is then developed to implement the proposed method for the case of emergency operating center/system evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arfi B (2005) Fuzzy decision making in politics: A linguistic fuzzy-set approach (LFSA). Polit Anal 13(1):23–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attorney-General’s Department, Australian Government (2004) Emergency risk management applications guide, Manual 5, Emergency Management, Australia, http://www.ema.gov.au/agd/EMA/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(383B7EDC29CDE21FBA276BBBCE12CDC0) ~ Manual + 05a.pdf/$file/Manual + 05a.pdf

  • Ben-Arieh D, Chen Z (2006) Linguistic group decision-making: Opinion aggregation and measures of consensus. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 5(4):371–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 27(1):126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose U, Davey AM, Olson DL (1997) Multi-attribute utility methods in group decision making, past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS. Omega 25:691–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D (2000) Evaluation and Decision Models, A critical perspective Springer

  • Chang P, Chen Y (1994) A fuzzy multicriteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology. Fuzzy Sets Syst 63:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2001) Applying linguistic decision-making method to deal with service quality evaluation problems. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 9(Suppl):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Lin Y (2000) Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142(1):174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Yang KL, Hwang CL (1999) Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuu SJ (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making for evaluating manufacturing flexibility. Prod Plann Control 16(3):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devedzic GB, Pap E (1999) Multicriteria-multistages linguistic evaluation and ranking of machine tools. Fuzzy Sets Syst 102:451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera VE (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh VN, Nakamori Y (2005) A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic Assessments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 35(2):184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Ruan D, Ibrahim D (2003) Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inf Sci 157(1–4):135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karacapilidis N, Pappis C (2000) Computer-supported collaborative argumentation and fuzzy similarity measures in multiple criteria decision-making. Comput Oper Res 27:653–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective Group Decision Making: Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Technology. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marimin M, Hatono I, Tamura H (1998) Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 28:205–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Energy, Federal Emergency Management Information System (FEMIS) (2003), Data Management Guide for v1.4.7, http://www.pnl.gov/femis/documents/previous-releases/Dmg147.htm

  • Wang J, Lin Y (2003) A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development. Fuzzy Sets Syst 134:343–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WangYM, Chin KS, Kwai K, Poon G, Yang J (2007) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean, Expert Systems with Applications

  • Xu Z (2005) An approach to pure linguistic multiple attribute decision making under uncertainty. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4(2):197–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1993) Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making. Group Decis Negotiation 2:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CH, Kuo YL (2003) Evaluating passenger services of Asia-Pacific international airports. Transportation Res E Logistics Transportation Review 39(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon K, Hwang C (1995) Multiple attribute decision making–An introduction. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Lu J (2003) An integrated group decision making method with fuzzy preference for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decision and Negotiation 12:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) under discovery grants DP0559213 and DP0880739.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangquan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Ma, J. & Lu, J. Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 517–527 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0237-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0237-3

Keywords

Navigation