Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic changes of bacterial community under bioremediation with Sphingobium sp. LY-6 in buprofezin-contaminated soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buprofezin is a commonly used chemical with satisfactory biological activity against sucking insect pests, but its disposal can cause serious environmental problems. To study the feasibility of remedying contamination by buprofezin, microcosm experiments were carried out to study the effects of various concentrations of buprofezin and Sphingobium sp. LY-6 on soil bacterial communities in soils collected from vegetable fields. In this experiment, the results showed that buprofezin was effectively degraded by Sphingobium sp. LY-6 in incubation soils. Comparing to non-incubated soils, the cumulative degradation ratio of buprofezin was significantly increased, up to the extent of 85 and 51 %, in the initial concentration of 10 and 100 mg kg−1. The abundance and community structure of the bacterial communities were analysed by real-time PCR (qPCR) and terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The findings suggest that buprofezin had a negative effect on soil bacterial community, and decreases in bacterial abundance were observed in the later part of the incubation period. The bacterial community structure and diversity shifted significantly at each sampling time. In conclusion, the buprofezin-degrading strain LY-6 played a major role in the bioremediation of the buprofezin-contaminated soil and influenced the dynamics and structure of the bacterial community, demonstrating the great potential of exogenous microorganisms for soil remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

T-RFLP:

Terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

PCA:

Principal component analysis

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

References

  1. Ibrahim M, Al-Magboul K, Kamal M (2001) Voltammetric determination of the insecticide buprofezin in soil and water. Anal Chim Acta 432:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Errami M, Salghi R, Zougagh M, Zarrouk A, Chakir A et al (2013) Electrochemical degradation of buprofezin insecticide in aqueous solutions by anodic oxidation at boron-doped diamond electrode. Res Chem Intermed 39:505–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Osman KA, Ibrahim GH, Askar AI (2008) Biodegradation kinetics of dicofol by selected microorganisms. Pestic Biochem Physiol 91(3):180–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows HD, Canle M, Santaballa JA, Steenken S (2002) Reaction pathways and mechanisms of photodegradation of pesticides. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 67(2):71–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Devipriya S, Yesodharan S (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of pesticide contaminants in water. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 86(3):309–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraft A, Stadelmann M, Blaschke MJ (2003) Anodic oxidation with doped diamond electrodes: a new advanced oxidation process. J Hazard Mater 103(3):247–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouya H, Errami M, Salghi R, Bazzi L, Zarrouk A, Al-Deyab SS (2012) Electrochemical degradation of cypermethrin pesticide on a SnO2 anode. Int J Electrochem Sci 7(4):7453

    Google Scholar 

  8. Errami M, Salghi R, Zarrouk A (2012) Electrochemical degradation of imazalil and pyrimethanil by anodic oxidation on boron-doped diamond. J Chem Pharm Res 4(7):3518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beškoski VP, Gojgić-Cvijović G, Milić J, Ilić M, Miletić S et al (2011) Ex situ bioremediation of a soil contaminated by mazut (heavy residual fuel oil)—a field experiment. Chemosphere 83:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner K, You L, Arnold FH (2008) Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol 26:483–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen K, Liu XM, Li R, Liu Y, Hu H et al (2011) Isolation of a buprofezin co-metabolizing strain of Pseudomonas sp. DFS35-4 and identification of the buprofezin transformation pathway. Biodegradation 22:1135–1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li C, Zhang J, Wu ZG, Cao L, Yan X et al (2012) Biodegradation of buprofezin by Rhodococcus sp. strain YL-1 isolated from rice field soil. J Agri Food Chem 60:2531–2537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu RK (2000) Methods of soil and agro-chemical analysis. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 302–309 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:650–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayansina ADV, Oso BA (2006) Effect of two commonly used herbicides on soil microflora at two different concentrations. Afr J Biotechnol 5(2):129–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Viñas M, Sabaté J, Espuny MJ, Solanas AM (2005) Bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation during bioremediation of heavily creosote-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7008–7018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Veen J, Van Overbeek L, Van Elsas J (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:121–135

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boopathy R (2000) Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol 74:63–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao J, Luo YM, Teng Y, Li ZG (2012) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium and associated microbial community changes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 70:141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zabaloy MC, Garland JL, Gomez MA (2008) An integrated approach to evaluate the impacts of the herbicides glyphosate, 2, 4-D and metsulfuron-methyl on soil microbial communities in the Pampas region, Argentina. Appl Soil Ecol 40:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crouzet O, Batisson I, Besse-Hoggan P, Bonnemoy F, Bardot C et al (2010) Response of soil microbial communities to the herbicide mesotrione: a dose-effect microcosm approach. Soil Biol Biochem 42:193–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barriuso J, Mellado RP (2012) Glyphosate affects the rhizobacterial communities in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. Appl Soil Ecol 55:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hart M, Brookes P (1996) Soil microbial biomass and mineralisation of soil organic matter after 19 years of cumulative field applications of pesticides. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1641–1649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weaver MA, Krutz LJ, Zablotowicz RM, Reddy KN (2007) Effects of glyphosate on soil microbial communities and its mineralization in a Mississippi soil. Pest Manag Sci 63:388–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haney R, Senseman S, Hons F (2002) Effect of roundup ultra on microbial activity and biomass from selected soils. J Environ Qual 31:730–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ros M, Goberna M, Moreno J, Hernandez T, Garcia C et al (2006) Molecular and physiological bacterial diversity of a semi-arid soil contaminated with different levels of formulated atrazine. Appl Soil Ecol 34:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou JH, Sun XW, Jiao JG, Liu MQ, Hu F et al (2013) Dynamic changes of bacterial community under the influence of bacterial-feeding nematodes grazing in prometryne contaminated soil. Appl Soil Ecol 64:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petrić I, Bru D, Udiković-Kolić N, Hršak D, Philippot L et al (2011) Evidence for shifts in the structure and abundance of the microbial community in a long-term PCB-contaminated soil under bioremediation. J Hazard Mater 195:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo WS, D’Angelo EM, Coyne MS (2008) Organic carbon effects on aerobic polychlorinated biphenyl removal and bacterial community composition in soils and sediments. Chemosphere 70:364–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marschner P, Yang C-H, Lieberei R, Crowley D (2001) Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1437–1445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (31100083), the Foundation for Young Talents in College of Anhui Province, Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Anhui (1508085MC49) and Scholar Backbone Supporting Plan of Huaibei Normal University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangli Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Hou, Q., Liu, W. et al. Dynamic changes of bacterial community under bioremediation with Sphingobium sp. LY-6 in buprofezin-contaminated soil. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 1485–1493 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1391-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1391-x

Keywords

Navigation