Abstract
In their recent study, Borowicz and Armstrong (Oecologia 169:783–792, 2012) investigated effects of nutrient availability and competition for light on a perennial root hemiparasite Pedicularis canadensis. Their study showed a reduction of community productivity as a result of hemiparasite infection independently of a clear positive effect of increased nutrients. In contrast, there was a minimal effect of increased competition for light on growth of the parasite. Here, we summarize the available data on the influence of nutrient availability (closely related to productivity) on temperate grassland root hemiparasites thus expanding the discussion presented by Borowicz and Armstrong (Oecologia 169:783–792, 2012). Most studies show that root hemiparasites are highly sensitive to elevated competition for light in productive environments, which is manifested as an increase in mortality coupled to a decrease in population density. Such responses reflect increased mortality of hemiparasite seedlings that are physiologically inefficient in terms of photosynthesis and nutrient acquisition owing to a limited root network and consequently, are highly sensitive to competition for light. However, the susceptibility of hemiparasites to competition for light tends to decrease for individuals that survive the critical seedling stage. Moreover, survivors benefit from elevated nutrient availability, resulting in increased growth and fecundity. Elevated productivity can thus have opposing effects on the survival and growth of hemiparasites depending on life stage. We conclude that the findings by Borowicz and Armstrong (Oecologia 169:783–792, 2012) are not in conflict with this general view that root hemiparasite population ecology is strongly influenced by competition for light in highly productive environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borowicz VA, Armstrong JE (2012) Resource limitation and the role of a hemiparasite on a restored prairie. Oecologia 169:783–792
Cameron DD, White A, Antonovics J (2009) Parasite-grass-forb interactions and rock-paper-scissor dynamics: predicting the effects of the parasitic plant Rhinanthus minor on host plant communities. J Ecol 97:1311–1319
Davies DM, Graves JD (1998) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the hemiparasitic angiosperm Rhinanthus minor during co-infection of a host. New Phytol 139:555–563
Davies DM, Graves JD (2000) The impact of phosphorus on interactions of the hemiparasitic angiosperm Rhinanthus minor and its host Lolium perenne. Oecologia 124:100–106
Fibich P, Lepš J, Berec L (2010) Modelling the population dynamics of root hemiparasitic plants along a productivity gradient. Folia Geobot 45:425–442
Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145
Hadač E (1969) Die Pflanzengesellshaften des Tales “Dolina Siedmich prameňov” in der Belaer Tatra. Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej Akadémie Vied, Bratislava
Hautier Y, Niklaus PA, Hector A (2009) Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science 324:636–638
Hautier Y, Hector A, Vojtech E, Purves D, Turnbull LA (2010) Modelling the growth of parasitic plants. J Ecol 98:857–866
Hejcman M, Češková M, Schellberg J, Pätzold S (2010) The Rengen grassland experiment: effect of soil chemical properties on biomass production, plant species composition and species richness. Folia Geobot 45:125–142
Hejcman M, Schellberg J, Pavlů V (2011a) Competitive ability of Rhinanthus minor L. in relation to productivity in the Rengen grassland experiment. Plant Soil Environ 57:45–51
Hejcman M, Štětinová Z, Hejcmanová P, Pavlů V, Schellberg J (2011b) Plant density and seed production of Rhinanthus minor under long-term Ca, N, P and K fertiliser application in the Rengen Grassland Experiment (Germany). In: Potsch E, Krautzer B, Hopkins A (eds) Grassland farming and land management systems in mountain regions—grassland science in Europe 16. Proceedings of the 16th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, Gumpenstain, Austria, pp 595–597
Hwangbo J-K, Seel WE (2002) Effects of light availability on attached Rhinanthus minor (L.), an angiospermatic root hemiparasite. J Plant Biol 45:102–106
Jiang F, Jeschke WD, Hartung W, Cameron DD (2010) Interactions between Rhinanthus minor and its hosts: a review of water, mineral nutrient and hormone flows and exchanges in the hemiparasitic association. Folia Geobot 45:369–385
Keith AM, Cameron DD, Seel WE (2004) Spatial interactions between the hemiparasitic angiosperm Rhinanthus minor and its host are species-specific. Funct Ecol 18:435–442
Lechowski Z (1996) Gas exchange in leaves of the root hemiparasite Melampyrum arvense L. before and after attachment to the host plant. Biol Plant 38:85–93
Matthies D (1995) Parasitic and competitive interactions between the hemiparasites Rhinanthus serotinus and Odontites rubra and their host Medicago sativa. J Ecol 83:245–251
Matthies D, Egli P (1999) Response of a root hemiparasite to elevated CO2 depends on host type and soil nutrients. Oecologia 120:156–161
Mudrák O, Lepš J (2010) Interactions of the hemiparasitic species Rhinanthus minor with its host plant community at two nutrient levels. Folia Geobot 45:407–424
Seel WE, Parsons AN, Press MC (1993) Do inorganic solutes limit growth of the facultative hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor L. in the absence of a host? New Phytol 124:283–289
ter Borg SJ (2005) Dormancy and germination of six Rhinanthus species in relation to climate. Folia Geobot 40:243–260
Těšitel J, Plavcová L, Cameron DD (2010a) Heterotrophic carbon gain by the root-hemiparasites Rhinanthus minor and Euphrasia rostkoviana (Orobanchaceae). Planta 231:1137–1144
Těšitel J, Plavcová L, Cameron DD (2010b) Interactions between hemiparasitic plants and their hosts: the importance of organic carbon transfer. Plant Sign Beh 5:1072–1076
Těšitel J, Lepš J, Vráblová M, Cameron DD (2011) The role of heterotrophic carbon acquisition by the hemiparasitic plant Rhinanthus alectorolophus in seedling establishment in natural communities: a physiological perspective. New Phytol 192:188–199
van Hulst R, Shipley B, Thériault A (1987) Why is Rhinanthus minor (Scrophulariaceae) such a good invader? Can J Bot 65:2373–2379
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge financial support from the Czech Science Foundation (project no. P505/12/1390). D. D. C. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (award number: UF090328). The experiments comply with the current laws of Germany where they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bryan Foster.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Těšitel, J., Hejcman, M., Lepš, J. et al. How does elevated grassland productivity influence populations of root hemiparasites? Commentary on Borowicz and Armstrong (Oecologia 2012). Oecologia 172, 933–936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2566-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2566-7