Skip to main content
Log in

The initial capitalization superiority effect in German: evidence for a perceptual frequency variant of the orthographic cue hypothesis of visual word recognition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A perceptual frequency variant of the orthographic cue (OC) hypothesis (Peressotti, Cubelli, & Job, 2003) was tested in two perceptual identification experiments using the variable viewing position technique: German nouns and non-nouns that are most frequently perceived with or without initial letter capitalization, respectively, were tachistoscopically presented in upper-case, lower-case, or with initial capitalization. The results indicated that words were best recognized in the form they are most frequently perceived in, which suggests that during reading acquisition abstract as well as case- and item-specific OCs may be learned and used for recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The equation is mathematically identical to Nazir et al. (1998), but formulated differently—the asymmetry parameter A, which will be computed and interpreted in the fittings below is directly used in the current version of the formula, while in Nazir et al. (1998) it is indirectly computed from the drop-off rates to the right and to the left A = b_left/b_right. Thus, while by that linear transformation the mathematical content and fitting behavior of the formula is not affected, the interpretation of A can be directly verified in the formula as it stands now.

  2. The missing-letter effect refers to the phenomenon that letters are more difficult to detect in common function words than in content words. This effect is typically attributed to whole-word processing of highly familiar words that allows bypassing analyses at the letter level.

References

  • Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen R. H., Piepenbrock R., & van Rijn H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CDROM). Philadelphia: Lingusitic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., & Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print: Evidence from FBM and FBI. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading (pp. 121–135). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, M. (1989). Lesen in Abhängigkeit von der Groß-und Kleinschreibung (The dependency of reading on capital and small letters). Sprache & Kognition, 8, 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, M., Augst, G., & Wegner, I. (1985). Gross oder klein? Zur Funktion des Wortanfangs für den gegenwärtigen Leser (The function of capital letters and small letters for present-day readers). Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(3), 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, H., & Legein, C. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, M., & Nazir, T. (2005). Visual constraints in written word recognition: Evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farid, M., & Grainger, J. (1996). How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: A comparison of French and Arabic. Brain and Language, 53, 351–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L., & Chard, M. J. (1976). On the nature of the facilitation of visual comparisons by lexical membership. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 432–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P., Herskovits, E., & Degaonkar, M. (2005). The roles of the visual word form area in reading. NeuroImage, 24, 548–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. M., & Graf, R. (2005). Wortformgedächtnis als intuitive Statistik in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., & Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver-operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signal detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and cognition, 29, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 245–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montant, M., Nazir, T. A., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 93–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musseler, J., Nisslein, M., & Koriat, A. (2005). German capitalization of nouns and the detection of letters in continuous text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 143–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir, T. A., Heller, D., & Sussmann, C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 315–328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., & O’Regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 26, 810–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazir, T. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuerk, H.-C. (2001). On the importance of visual determinants in visual word recognition. Ph.D. Thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

  • O’Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K., Levy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oßwald, K., Brustmann, D., Nazir, T., Nuerk, H.-C., Graf, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (1998). Die optimale Blickposition bei lese-rechtschreibschwachen Kindern. In H. Lachnit, A. Jacobs & F. Rösler (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie: Abstracts der 40 Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 252). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shapes in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peressotti, F., Cubelli, R., & Job, R. (2003). On recognizing proper names: The orthographic cue hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 87–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G., Clews, S., & Everatt, J. (1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology [A], 42, 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 583–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 27, 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) to Arthur M. Jacobs supporting Ralf Graf and Hans-Christoph Nuerk (Teilprojekte 7 und 8 der Forschergruppe: Dynamik kognitiver Repräsentationen). Tatjana A. Nazir is member of the Marie Curie research and Training Network: Language and Brain (RTN:LAB) funded by the European Commission (MRTN-CT–2004-512141) as part of its “Sixth Framework Program). We thank Katja Oßwald, Daniela Brustmann, and Kai Richter for their precious help in the realization of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur M. Jacobs.

Appendix

Appendix

All stimuli were five-letter German nouns and were displayed in a fixed font (Table 3).

Table 3 Noun stimuli of Experiment 1 and non-noun stimuli of Experiment 2: Note that due to the Latin Square Design and the within-participant presentation of different word forms, i.e., repetitions, individual item statistics are not meaningful and are hence not reported in Experiments 1 and 2 (see text for details)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, A.M., Nuerk, HC., Graf, R. et al. The initial capitalization superiority effect in German: evidence for a perceptual frequency variant of the orthographic cue hypothesis of visual word recognition. Psychological Research 72, 657–665 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0168-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0168-0

Keywords

Navigation