Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metastasis to the lymph nodes along the proper hepatic artery from adenocarcinoma of the stomach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study sought the significance of resecting lymph nodes along the proper hepatic artery (station 12a) in gastric cancer surgery and the possibility of predicting station 12a involvement from clinicopathological factors or metastatic status in other regional lymph nodes of the stomach.

Methods

Patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy were assessed retrospectively. Survivals were compared between the patients with and without station 12a metastasis among the patients with metastasis to any regional lymph nodes. Clinicopathological factors correlating with station 12a metastasis were sought by logistic regression analyses. The possibility of a predictor for station 12a metastasis was evaluated in each regional lymph node station.

Results

Metastasis to station 12a was observed in 21 of 1260 patients (1.7 %). The 5-year overall survival rate was 62.7 % in the patients without station 12a metastasis and 54.4 % in the patients with station 12a metastasis (P = 0.164). The lower third (OR 3.810, 95 % CI 1.507–9.631, P = 0.005), the lesser curvature or circumferential involvement (OR 4.099, 95 % CI 1.178–14.259, P = 0.027) and 81.5 mm or larger tumor diameter (OR 2.959, 95 % CI 1.212–7.224, P = 0.017) were identified as the independent risk factors of station 12a metastasis. Station 11p significantly correlated with station 12a metastasis (OR 13.469, 95 % CI 1.437–126.216, P = 0.023). The false negatives as predictors of station 12a metastasis ranged from 14.3 % (station 6) to 100.0 % (station 11d) for each regional lymph node station.

Conclusions

Given the difficulty in predicting station 12a metastasis and the favorable survival in the patients with metastasis to the nodes, station 12a should be resected in a D2 gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T (1987) Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg 11:418–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K (1995) New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82:346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sierra A, Regueira FM, Hernandez-Lizoain JL, Pardo F, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Cienfuegos J (2003) Role of the extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery: experience in a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 10:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Chen JH, Li AF, Lui WY, Whang-Peng J (2006) Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 7:309–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, Van de Velde CJ, Welvaart K, Songun I, Meyer S, Plukker JT, Van EP, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, van Lanschot JJ, Taat CW, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H (1999) Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 340:908–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, Bancewicz J, Craven J, Joypaul V, Sydes M, Fayers P (1999) Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer 79:1522–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rudiger SJ, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ (2000) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 232:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, Yamaue H, Yoshikawa T, Kojima K (2010) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 13:238–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ajisaka H, Miwa K (2003) Micrometastases in sentinel nodes of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 89:676–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumagai K, Yamamoto N, Miyashiro I, Tomita Y, Katai H, Kushima R, Tsuda H, Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Mukai M, Mano M, Mochizuki H, Kato Y, Matsuura N, Sano T (2014) Multicenter study evaluating the clinical performance of the OSNA assay for the molecular detection of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer 17:273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was not funded by any grant.

This paper is not based on a previous communication to a society or meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoki Hiki.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumagai, K., Hiki, N., Nunobe, S. et al. Metastasis to the lymph nodes along the proper hepatic artery from adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 677–685 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1429-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1429-9

Keywords

Navigation