Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate surgical outcomes and complications after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) in relation to rhinostomy shape.
Methods
A retrospective electronic medical record review of patients who underwent EDCR for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) was performed. Surgical success rates and postoperative complications were compared among three groups of patients in relation to rhinostomy shape (alcove, cavern, or concealed cavern).
Results
A total of 280 patients (358 eyes) were included in the study. Of the 358 eyes, 194 rhinostomies were alcove-shaped, 157 were cavern-shaped, and 7 were concealed cavern-shaped. There were no patients with flat-shaped rhinostomies. The nasal cavity was wider in patients in the alcove group than those in the cavern and concealed cavern groups (p = 0.012). The mean time to tube removal was longest in the concealed cavern group (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in anatomical success rates among the three groups (p = 0.338). With regard to functional success for patients with anatomically patent DCR, the cavern and concealed cavern groups had significantly poorer results than the alcove group (p = 0.001). Functional success rates were 91.6 %, 84.8 %, and 57.1 % for the alcove, cavern, and concealed cavern groups, respectively. Development of postoperative granuloma was more frequent in the concealed cavern group (85.7 %) than in the alcove (29.3 %) or cavern groups (26.1 %) (p= 0.003). Multiple logistic regression models for surgical outcome showed that rates of functional failure after EDCR were influenced by patient age and rhinostomy shape (odds ratio 1.824, p = 0.045 for age; odds ratio = 9.605, p = 0.000 for rhinostomy shape) (Table 5).
Conclusions
The incidence rate of symptomatic epiphora after EDCR was approximately 12 %, and this result may have been associated with cavernous and concealed rhinostomy shapes. For patients with persistent epiphora and anatomically patent DCR, it is important to identify rhinostomy shape by endoscopy in order to differentiate causes of functional failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P (1993) Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 7(Pt 4):545–549
Bartley GB (1994) The pros and cons of laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 117:103–106
Allen K, Berlin AJ (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg 20:486–489
Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119
Fayet B, Racy E, Assouline M (2004) Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 111:837–845
Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 112:1463–1468
Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2004) Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20:50–56
Sham CL, van Hasselt CA (2000) Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope (LWW) 110:1045–1049
Apaydin KC, Fisenk F, Karayalcin B, Akar Y, Saka O (2004) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Ophthalmologica 218:306–311
Tabatabaie SZ, Heirati A, Rajabi MT, Kasaee A (2007) Silicone intubation with intraoperative mitomycin C for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:455–458
Selig YK, Biesman BS, Rebeiz EE (2000) Topical application of mitomycin-C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 14:205–207
Olver J (2002) Colour Atlas of Lacrimal Surgery. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, p 135
Lee MJ, Khwarg SI, Choung HK, Kim N (2014) Associated factors of functional failure of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Can J Ophthalmol 49:40–44
Wu W, Yan W, MacCallum JK, Tu Y, Jiang AC, Yang Y, Xiao T, Li J, Wang Q, Qu J (2009) Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 116:116–122
Berlucchi M, Castelnuovo P, Vincenzi A, Morra B, Pasquini E (2009) Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 266:839–845
Xu G, Chen HX, Wen WP, Shi JB, Li Y (2003) Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol 38:95–97
Jang SY, Lee KH, Lee SY, Yoon JS (2013) Effects of nasopore packing on dacryocystorhinostomy. Korean J Ophthalmol 27:73–80
Yazici B, Yazici Z (2003) Final nasolacrimal ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 121(1):76–80
Zilelioğlu G, Uğurbaş SH, Anadolu Y, Akiner M, Aktürk T (1998) Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 82(1):63–66
Ezra E, Restori M, Mannor GE, Rose GE (1998) Ultrasonic assessment of rhinostomy size following external dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 82(7):786–789
Rose GE (2004) The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 20:262–265
Anderson RL (1977) Gelfoam packing after dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 95:520
Durrani OM, Fernando AI, Reuser TQ (2007) Use of a novel topical hemostatic sealant in lacrimal surgery: a prospective, comparative study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:25–27
Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320
Wang YP, Wang MC, Chen YC, Leu YS, Lin HC, Lee KS (2011) The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 74:16–21
Kim NJ, Kim JH, Hwang SW, Choung HK, Lee YJ, Khwarg SI (2007) Lacrimal silicone intubation for anatomically successful but functionally failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Korean J Ophthalmol 21:70–73
Delaney YM, Khooshabeh R (2002) Fluorescein transit test time and symptomatic outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 18:281–284
Acknowledgements
Funding/Support
The authors state that they received no financial support and have no conflicts of interest.
Financial disclosures
We have no financial disclosures. We also uploaded the Modified ICMJE Financial Disclosure Form.
Author contributions are as follows: study concept and design (J.L., H.L., S.Y., M.C., M.P., S.B.); conduct of the study (J.L.,S.Y.,M.C.,M.P.,S.B.); data collection and management (J.L., H.L., S.Y., M.C., S.B.); data analysis (J.L., H.L., S.Y., M.P., S.B.); data interpretation (J.L., H.L., M.C., M.P., S.B.); preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript (J.L., M.C., H.L., M.P., S.B.).
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Yang, S.W., Lee, H. et al. Association of rhinostomy shape and surgical outcome after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 1601–1607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2967-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2967-5