Abstract
The aim of this work was to estimate in an incident cohort of pharmacy-based PD patients the survival of men and women accounting for age at treatment initiation and to compare their gender-specific survival with that of the general Israeli population. A population-based cohort of 4,848 incident pharmacy-based PD cases with definite/probable/possible certainty was previously identified using a drug-tracer approach for 1999–2008. Survival analysis was performed for two time scales: survival after treatment initiation (disease duration), and life-time survival (life expectancy). Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regressions were used to compare survival across gender. Gender-specific SMRs were calculated from national rates and were compared using Poisson regression. During the follow-up from first purchase of any anti-parkinsonian drug (mean 4.0 ± 2.6 years, range 2 months–10 years), 1,266 (26 %) of the cases died. Younger age at first anti-parkinsonian drug purchase and female gender were associated with increased survival after treatment initiation (HR = 1.089, 95 % CI 1.080–1.098 for 1-year age increase; HR = 0.716, 95 % CI 0.640–0.800, females vs. males). Life-time survival increased with older age at first anti-parkinsonian drug purchase and female gender (HR = 0.759, 95 % CI 0.746–0.771 for 1-year age increase; HR = 0.694, 95 % CI 0.621–0.776, females vs. males). Sensitivity analysis on a sub-cohort of definite cases (n = 2501) yielded similar results. In comparison to the general Israeli population, mortality among pharmacy-based PD patients was significantly increased (SMRmen = 1.69, 95 % CI 1.57–1.81, SMRwomen = 1.49, 95 % CI 1.37–1.62), differently between genders (p < 0.01). Female gender was associated with longer, perhaps more benign disease course, and longer life expectancy. Earlier age at anti-parkinsonian drug initiation increased disease duration, but was associated with shorter life expectancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ishihara LS, Cheesbrough A, Brayne C, Schrag A (2007) Estimated life expectancy of Parkinson’s patients compared with the UK population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:1304–1309
Brandt-Christensen M, Kvist K, Nilsson FM, Andersen PK, Kessing LV (2006) Use of antiparkinsonian drugs in Denmark: results from a nationwide pharmacoepidemiological study. Mov Disord 21:1221–1225
Chillag-Talmor O, Giladi N, Linn S et al (2011) Use of a refined drug tracer algorithm to estimate prevalence and incidence of Parkinson’s disease in a large Israeli population. J Parkinson’s Dis 1:35–47
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (2010). Complete life tables of Israel, 2004–2008. Jerusalem
Taeger D, Sun Y, Keil U, Straif K (2000) A stand-alone windows applications for computing exact person-years, standardized mortality ratios and confidence intervals in epidemiological studies. Epidemiology 11:607–608
Elbaz A, Bower JH, Peterson BJ et al (2003) Survival study of Parkinson disease in Olmsted County Minnesota. Arch Neurol 60:91–96
Louis ED, Bennett DA (2007) Mild Parkinsonian signs: an overview of an emerging concept. Mov Disord 22:1681–1688
Forsaa EB, Larsen JP, Wentzel-Larsen T et al (2010) What predicts mortality in Parkinson’s disease? A prospective population-based long-term study. Neurology 75:1270–1276
Shulman LM, Bhat V (2006) Gender disparities in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother 6:407–416
Chen H, Zhang SM, Schwarzschild MA, Hernan MA, Ascherio A (2006) Survival of Parkinson’s disease patients in a large prospective cohort of male health professionals. Mov Disord 21:1002–1007
Guttman M, Slaughter PM, Theriault ME, DeBoer DP (2001) Naylor CD Parkinsonism in Ontario: increased mortality compared with controls in a large cohort study. Neurology 57(12):2278–2282
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grant SGA0902 from the Environment and Health Fund, Jerusalem, Israel.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical standards
The studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
C. Peretz is a principle author.
Appendix
Appendix
Terms defined above (Table 2) are italicized in the algorithm table below
1 | Minimum 1 purchase during the study period 1.1.1998–31.12.2008 | No→ | Exclusion |
Yes↓ | |||
2 | 20 ≤age at first purchase <85 | No→ | Exclusion |
Yes↓ | |||
3 | Minimum 3 purchase months within FUP | No→ | Exclusion |
Yes↓ | |||
4 | Purchases of GR 3 only (bromocriptine) AND pattern suggesting indications other than PD, namely: subjects with first purchase in 2003 or later, or subjects with final purchase gap ≥365 days, or women with age at first purchase <50 | Yes→ | Exclusion |
No↓ | |||
5 | FUP ≥3 years | No→ | Go to step 15, algorithm for FUP < 3 years |
Yes↓ | |||
Algorithm for subjects with FUP ≥3 years | |||
6 | At least 1 observation segment with a minimum of 3 purchase months | No→ | Exclusion |
Yes↓ | |||
7 | At least 1 purchase month of GR 7 (apomorphine) | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
Note: As of step 8, all criteria are applied to the examined interval | |||
8 | During the examined interval, at least 24 purchase months of GR 1, 2, 4, or 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
9 | If age at first purchase <75: during at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 9 purchase months of GR 1, 2, or 4; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 18 purchase months of GR 5 if age at first purchase ≥75: during at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 9 purchase months of GR 1 or 2; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 18 purchase months of GR 4 or 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
10 | During at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of two groups or more, any combination excluding (4 + 5) | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
11 | If age at first purchase <75: during at least one of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 purchase months of GR 1, 2, or 4, or 9 purchase months of GR 5; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 16 purchase months of GR 5 if age at first purchase ≥75: during at least one of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 purchase months of GR 1 or 2, or 9 purchase months of GR 4 or 5; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 16 purchase months of GR 4 or 5 | Yes→ | Go to step 13 |
No↓ | |||
12 | During at least one of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of GR (4 + 5), OR minimum 3 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of two groups or more, any combination excluding (4 + 5) | No→ | Go to step 14 |
Yes↓ | |||
13 | Final purchase gap <365 days | Yes→ | Certainty level: probable |
No↓ | |||
14 | Remaining subjects | Yes→ | Certainty level: possible |
End | |||
Algorithm for subjects with FUP <3 years | |||
15 | Age at first purchase ≤65; OR lag to first purchase ≥1 year and deceased during the study period | Yes→ | Go to step 6 |
No↓ | |||
16 | At least 1 observation segment with a minimum of 3 purchase months, OR during any two observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 4 purchase months, OR—for subjects with FUP <2 years—minimum 3 purchase months within the entire FUP | No→ | Exclusion |
Yes↓ | |||
17 | Lag to first purchase <1 year and deceased during the study period | Yes→ | Go to step 7 |
No↓ | |||
18 | At least 1 purchase month of GR 7 (apomorphine) | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
19 | During the examined interval, at least 24 purchase months of GR 1, 2, 4, or 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
20 | During at least one of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 purchase months of GR 1, 2, or 4; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 18 purchase months of GR 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
21 | During at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of two groups or more, any combination excluding (4 + 5), OR minimum 3 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of two groups or more, any combination of GR 1, 2, 4, 6 | Yes→ | Certainty level: definite |
No↓ | |||
22 | During at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 9 purchase months of GR 5; OR during any two of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 16 purchase months of GR 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: probable |
No↓ | |||
23 | During at least 1 of the observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 6 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of GR (4 + 5), OR minimum 3 simultaneous purchase months of drugs of two groups or more, any combination excluding (4 + 5) | Yes→ | Certainty level: probable |
No↓ | |||
24 | Final purchase gap <365 days | No→ | Go to step 26 |
Yes↓ | |||
25 | At least 1 observation segment with a minimum of 3 purchase months of GR 1, 2, or 4 OR during any two observation segments within the examined interval, minimum 4 purchase months and no purchases of GR 3 or 5, OR—for subjects with FUP <2 years—minimum 3 purchase months within the entire FUP and no purchases of GR 3 or 5 | Yes→ | Certainty level: probable |
No↓ | |||
26 | Remaining subjects | Yes→ | Certainty level: possible |
End |
.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chillag-Talmor, O., Giladi, N., Linn, S. et al. Estimation of Parkinson’s disease survival in Israeli men and women, using health maintenance organization pharmacy data in a unique approach. J Neurol 260, 62–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6584-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6584-5