Abstract
Introduction
The Tönnis classification is widely accepted for grading hip arthritis, but its usefulness as a reference in hip-preserving surgery is yet to be demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate reproducibility of the Tönnis classification in early stages of hip osteoarthritis, and thus determine whether it is a reliable reference for hip-preserving surgery.
Materials and methods
Three orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of experience examined 117 hip X-rays that were randomly mixed of two groups: a group of 31 candidates for hip-preserving surgery and a control group of 30 patients that were asymptomatic with respect to the hip joint. The surgeons were asked to rate an eventual osteoarthritis according to the Tönnis classification. After 2 months, the surgeons were asked to re-evaluate the X-rays in a random order. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated by comparing the observers’ two estimations using Kappa statistics.
Results
Kappa values for interobserver reliability were slight or fair (range 0.173–0.397). Kappa values for intraobserver reproducibility were fair (range 0.364–0.397). Variance in grading no and slight osteoarthritis was the most frequent cause for intra- and interobserver disagreements (76.3 and 73.01 % of the non-concordant observations, respectively). The confidence interval analysis showed that the observers’ experience did not affect reproducibility.
Conclusions
The Tönnis classification is a poor method to assess early stages of hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that its routine use in therapeutic decision-making for conservative hip surgery should be reconsidered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogunovic L, Gottlieb M, Pashos G, Baca G, Clohisy JC (2013) Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2523–2529
Byrd JW, Jones KS (2010) Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:741–746
Domb BG, Gui C, Lodhia P (2015) How much arthritis is too much for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:520–529
Domb BG, Linder D, Finley Z, Botser IB, Chen A, Williamson J, Gupta A (2015) Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients aged 50 years or older compared with a matched-pair control of patients aged 30 years or younger. Arthroscopy 31:231–238
Horisberger M, Brunner A, Herzog RF (2010) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement of the hip: a new technique to access the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:182–190
Kamath AF, Componovo R, Baldwin K, Israelite CL, Nelson CL (2009) Hip arthroscopy for labral tears. Review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1721–1727
Larson CM, Giveans MR, Taylor M (2011) Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve function with radiographic arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1667–1676
Skendzel JG, Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Goljan P (2014) The effect of joint space on midterm outcomes after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 42:1127–1133
Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2008) Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1633–1644
Brückl R, Hepp WR, Tönnis D (1972) Eine Abgrenzung normaler und dysplastischer Hüftgelenke durch den Hüftwert. Arch Orthop and Trauma Surg 74:13–32
Busse J, Gasteiger W, Tönnis D (1972) Eine neue Methode zur röntgenologischen Beurteilung eines Hüftgelenkes—Der Hüftwert. Arch Orthop and Trauma Surg 72:1–9
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PL, Millis M (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:666–675
Gedouin JE, May O, Bonin N et al (2010) Assessment of arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. A prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96 (Supl):59–67
Haviv B, O’Donnell J (2010) The incidence of total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritic patients. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2:18
Kim KC, Hwang DS, Lee CH, Kwon ST (2007) Influence of femoroacetabular impingement on results of hip arthroscopy in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456:128–132
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim Y, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47–66
Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1747–1770
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Nepple JJ, Martell JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Millis MB, Podeszwa DA, Sucato DJ, Sink EL, Clohisy JC, ANCHOR Study Group (2014) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. Am J Sports Med 42:2393–2401
Croft P, Cooper C, Wickham C, Coggon D (1990) Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 132:514–522
Lane NEE, Nevitt MC, Hochberg MC, Hung YY, Palermo L (2004) Progression of radiographic hip osteoarthritis over eight years in a community sample of elderly white women. Arthritis Rheum 50:1477–1486
Wright AA, Cook C, Abbott JH (2009) Variables associated with the progression of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 61:925–936
Vignon E, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Richard S, Carrillon Y, Fantino O (1999) Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:434–436
Resnick D, Niwayama G, Coutt D (1977) Subchondral cysts (Geodes) in arthritic disorders: pathologic and radiographic appearance of the hip joint. Am J Roentgenol 128:799–806
Günther KP, Sun Y (1999) Reliability of radiographic assessment in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:239–246
Pitt MJ, Graham AR, Shipman JH, Birkby W (1982) Herniation Pit of the Femoral Neck. AJR 138:1115–1121
Goker B, Sancak A, Arac M, Shott S, Block JA (2003) The radiographic joint space width in clinically normal hips: effects of age, gender and physical parameters. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11:328–334
Goker B, Sancak A, Haznedaroglu S, Arac M, Block JA (2005) The effects of minor hip flexion, abduction or adduction and X-ray beam angle on the radiographic joint space width of the hip. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13:379–386
Altman RD, Bloch DA, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Lohmder S, Pavelka K, Spector T, Vignon E (2004) Measurement of structural progresssion in osteoarthritis of the hip: the Barcelona consensus group. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:515–524
Pogrund H, Bloom R, Mogle P (1983) The normal width of the adult hip joint: the relationship to age, sex, and obesity. Skeletal Radiol 10:10–12
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502
Reijman M, Hazes JMW, Koes BW, Verhagen AP, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA (2004) Validity, reliability, and applicability of seven definitions of hip osteoarthritis used in epidemiological studies: a systematic appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis 63:226–232
Ochoa LM, Dawson L, Patzkowski JC, Hsu JR (2010) Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in a young population with hip complaints is high. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2710–2714
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valera, M., Ibañez, N., Sancho, R. et al. Reliability of Tönnis classification in early hip arthritis: a useless reference for hip-preserving surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 27–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2356-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2356-x