Abstract
Purpose
Enhanced recovery programmes (ERP) are now becoming integral to the management of patients undergoing colorectal resection. The benefits of ERP in patients undergoing open colorectal resections have been well recognized; however, the value of ERP in patients undergoing laparoscopic resections is still uncertain. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of ERP in our unit where nearly 90 % of elective colorectal resections are performed laparoscopically.
Methods
A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing colorectal resections between Jan 2008 to December 2012 was analysed. The ERP programme was introduced in Aug 2010. The primary outcome measure was post-operative length of stay. Secondary outcome measures were post-operative morbidity and mortality.
Results
A total of 506 patients underwent major colorectal resections in the study period (282 patients since introduction of ERP). There were no demographic differences between the pre-ERP and post-ERP groups of patients. The median length of stay prior to the introduction of ERP was 6 days (right-sided resections = 6, left-sided resections = 7.5 and rectal resections = 5.5). For post-ERP, the median length of stay was 5 days (right = 5.5, left = 5 and rectal = 4). Patients who had their laparoscopic procedure converted to open had a course similar to open resections. The morbidity and mortality was lesser in the ERP group but did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion
The introduction of an ERP adds additional value in laparoscopic colorectal resections, with further reductions in morbidity and length of stay.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57. doi:10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008
Kehlet H (2011) Fast-track surgery - an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396:585–590. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y
Rao PKD, Haray P (2014) Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: principles and current practice. Surgery 32(4):185–189. doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2014.02.014
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:295–284. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multi-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
Trastulli S (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Color Dis 14(6):96. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02985.x
Dhruva Rao PK, Shah P, Haray P (2013) The stepwise approach to laparoscopic colorectal resection - making training safer. Color Dis 15(Suppl 3):31
Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, LAFA study group (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce
Patel GN, Rammos CK, Patel JV, Estes NC (2010) Further reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic colon resection by modifications of the fast-track care plan. Am J Surg 199(3):391–394. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.009, discussion 394–395
Khreiss W, Huebner M, Cima RR, Dozois ER, Chua HK, Pemberton JH, Harmsen WS, Larson DW (2014) Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57(5):557–563. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000101
Lindsetmo RO, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected? Am J Surg 197(3):408–412. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.009
Dhruva Rao PK, Howells S, Haray P (2014) Enhanced recovery programme implementation – does a dedicated specialist nurse practitioner improve compliance? Color Dis 16(Suppl 2):79
Acknowledgments
All members of the colorectal multi-disciplinary team, in particular, Mr P R Shah, Mr AG Masoud (Surgeons), Mrs D Williams, Mrs S Hawkins, Mrs M Lewis (Specialist Nurses).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dhruva Rao, P.K., Howells, S. & Haray, P.N. Does an enhanced recovery programme add value to laparoscopic colorectal resections?. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 1473–1477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2320-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2320-9