Skip to main content
Log in

Atmospheric moisture budget and its regulation of the summer precipitation variability over the Southeastern United States

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atmospheric moisture budget and its regulation of the summer (June–July–August) precipitation over the Southeastern United State (SE U.S.) were examined during 1948–2007 using PRECipitation REConstruction over Land and multiple reanalysis datasets. The analysis shows that the interannual variation of SE U.S. summer precipitation can be largely explained by the leading Empirical Orthogonal Function mode showing a spatially homogenous sub-continental scale pattern. Consequently, areal-averaged precipitation was investigated to focus on the large-scale rainfall changes over the SE U.S. The wavelet analysis identifies an increased 2–4 year power spectrum in recent 30 years (1978–2007), suggesting an intensification of the interannual variability. Analysis of the atmospheric moisture budget indicates that the increase in precipitation variability is mainly caused by moisture transport, which exhibits a similar increase in the 2–4 year power spectrum for the same period. Moisture transport, in turn, is largely controlled by the seasonal mean component rather than the subseasonal-scale eddies. Furthermore, our results indicate that dynamic processes (atmospheric circulation) are more important than thermodynamic processes (specific humidity) in regulating the interannual variation of moisture transport. Specifically, the North Atlantic Subtropical High western ridge position is found to be a primary regulator, with the ridge in the northwest (southwest) corresponding to anomalous moisture divergence (convergence) over the SE U.S. Changes in moisture transport consistent with the increased frequency of these two ridge types in recent 30 years favor the intensification of summer precipitation variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. During 1958–1978, the time series are calculated as the average of NCEP/NCAR and ERA-40; during 1979–2002, the time series are calculated as the average of NCEP/NCAR, ERA-40, JRA-25 and NARR; during 2003–2007, the average is among NCEP/NCAR, JRA-25 and NARR. From 1948–1957, the time series are shown as NCEP/NCAR results.

  2. NCEP/NCAR reanalysis instead of ensemble time series is used hereafter for the following reasons. First, The NCEP/NCAR is the only one of the four reanalysis datasets covering the entire 60-year period. Second, the credibility of using NCEP/NCAR is ensured because the NCEP/NCAR shows qualitative similarity in characterizing SE U.S. summertime hydroclimate to the other three datasets during their overlapping period. Third, the usage of NCEP/NCAR data matches the geopotential height data applied in our following study.

  3. As convention, 850 hPa geopotential height is usually plotted at 60-m intervals with the reference level 1,500 m. For the NASH, the 1,500-gpm line is far into the continent while 1,620-gpm isoline is still over the North Atlantic; the 1,560-gpm line is also closely related to the distribution of precipitation and vertical motion over the eastern coast of U.S. (Li et al. 2012).

  4. From PV balance, strong mass convergence is expected north of the western ridge-line to balance the advection of planetary vorticity by southerly wind (Wu and Liu 2003; Liu et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2009). Thus, when the ridge moves southwestward, the SE U.S. is located north of the ridge-line, strong mass convergence facilitates moisture convergence and thus excessive rainfall there (Fig. 8a–c). In contrast, when the ridge moves northwestward into the U.S. continent, mass convergence is weakened over the SE U.S., which depresses summer precipitation (Fig. 8b–d).

  5. The domain used to derive the Nino indices are: \( Ni\tilde{n}o2 \): 90°W–80°W, 10S–0; \( Ni\tilde{n}o3 \): 150°W–90°W, 5S–5°N; \( Ni\tilde{n}o3.4 \): 170°W–120°W, 5S–5°N; \( Ni\tilde{n}o4\): 160E–150°W, 5S–5°N.

References

  • Alexander MA (2010) Extratropical air-sea interaction, SST variability and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). In: Sun D, Bryan F (eds) Climate dynamics: why does climate vary? AGU Monograph #189, Washington, DC, pp 123–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BT, Ruane AC, Roads JO, Kanamitsu M (2009) Estimating the influence of evaporation and moisture-flux convergence upon seasonal precipitation rates. Part II: analysis for North America based on NCEP-DOE reanalysis II model. J Hydrometeorol 10:893–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah E, Bosart LF, Aiyyer AR (2007) Precipitation distribution associated with landfalling tropical cyclones over the Eastern United States. Mon Weather Rev 135:2185–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baigorria GA, Jones JW, O’Brien JJ (2007) Understanding rainfall spatial variability in southeast USA at different timescales. Int J Climatol 27:749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow M (2011) Influence of hurricane-related activity on North American extreme precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 38:L04705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow M, Nigam S, Berbery EH (2001) ENSO, Pacific decadal variability, and U.S. summertime precipitation, drought, and stream flow. J Clim 14:2105–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros AP, Bowden GJ (2008) Toward long-lead operational forecasts of drought: an experimental study in the Murray-Darling River Basin. J Hydrol 357:349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosilovich MG, Schubert SD (2002) Water vapor tracers as diagnostics of the regional hydrologic cycle. J Hydrometeorol 3:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosilovich MG, Sun W-Y (1999) Numerical simulation of the 1993 Midwestern flood: land-atmosphere interactions. J Clim 12:1490–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucharel J, Dewitte B, Garel B, du Penhoat Y (2009) ENSO’s non-stationary and non-Gaussian character: the role of climate shifts. Nonlinear Process Geophys 16:453–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker KL, Entekhabi D, Eagleson PS (1993) Estimation of continental precipitation recycling. J Clim 6:1077–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Xie P, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA (2002) Global land precipitation: a 50-yr monthly analysis based on gauge observations. J Hydrometeorol 3:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Pollard D, Barron EJ (2003) Comparison of future climate change over North America simulated by two regional models. J Geophys Res Atmos 108:4348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH et al (2007) Regional climate projection. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Millor HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis S (2008) The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and extreme daily precipitation over the US and Mexico during the hurricane season. Clim Dyn 30:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dairaku K, Emori S (2006) Dynamic and thermodynamic influences on intensified daily rainfall during the Asian summer monsoon under doubled atmospheric CO2 conditions. Geophys Res Lett 33:L01704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RE, Hayden BP, Gay DA, Phillips WL, Jones GV (1997) The North Atlantic subtropical anticyclone. J Clim 10:728–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deser C, Alexander MA, Xie SP, Phillips AS (2010) Sea surface temperature variability: patterns and mechanisms. Annu Rev Mar Sci 2:115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz HF, Hoerling MP, Eischeid JK (2001) ENSO variability, teleconnections and climate change. Int J Climatol 21:1845–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirmeyer PA, Kinter JL (2010) Floods over the U.S. Midwest: a regional water cycle perspective. J Hydrometeorol 11:1172–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas EM, Barros AP (2002) Probable maximum precipitation estimation using multifractals: application in the Eastern United States. J Hydrometeorol 4:1012–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumond A, Nieto R, Gimeno L (2011) On the contribution of the Tropical Western Hemisphere Warm Pool source of moisture to the Northen Hemisphere precipitation through a Lagrangian approach. J Geophys Res Atmos 116:D00Q04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emori S, Brown SJ (2005) Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme precipitation under changed climate. Geophys Res Lett 32:L17706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield DB (1996) Relationships of inter-American rainfall to tropical Atlantic and Pacific SST variability. Geophys Res Lett 23:3305–3308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotvald AJ, McCallum BE (2010) Epic flooding in Georgia, 2009: US geological survey fact sheet 2010–3107, 2 p

  • Henderson KG, Vega AJ (1996) Regional precipitation variability in the southeastern United States. Phys Geogr 17:93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins RW, Shi W, Yarosh E, Joyce R (2000) Improved United States precipitation quality control system and analysis. NCEP/Climate Prediction Center ATLAS No. 7, 40 pp, Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA

  • Hoerling M, Kumar A (2003) The perfect ocean for drought. Science 299:691–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Huang B (2009) Interferential impact of ENSO and PDO on dry and wet conditions in the U.S. great plains. J Clim 22:6047–6065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H-P, Seager R, Kushnir Y (2005) The 1976/77 transition in precipitation over the Americas and the influence of tropical sea surface temperature. Clim Dyn 24:721–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkstein LS, Tan G, Skindlov J (1987) An evaluation of objective clustering procedures for use in synoptic climatological classification. J Clim Appl Meteorol 26:717–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP-NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RW, Parlange MB, Tebaldi C (2003) Stochastic modeling of the effects of large-scale circulation on daily weather in the southeastern US. Clim Change 60:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawase H, Abe M, Yamada Y, Takemura T, Yokohata T, Nozawa T (2010) Physical mechanism of long-term drying trend over tropical North Africa. Geophys Res Lett 37:L09706

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight DB, Davis RE (2007) Climatology of tropical cyclone rainfall in the southeastern United States. Phys Geogr 28:126–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight DB, Davis RE (2009) Contribution of tropical cyclones to extreme rainfall events in the southeastern United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:D23102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CE (1997) Synoptic-scale features associated with warm season heavy rainfall over the interior southeastern United States. Weather Forecast 12:557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CE, Perry LB (2010) Relationships between tropical cyclones and heavy rainfall in the Carolina region of the USA. Int J Climatol 30:522–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Li L, Fu R, Deng Y, Wang H (2011) Changes to the North Atlantic Subtropical High and its role in the intensification of summer rainfall variability in the Southeastern United States. J Clim 24:1499–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Li W, Kushnir Y (2012) Variation of North Atlantic Subtropical High western ridge and its implication to the Southeastern US summer precipitation. Clim Dyn 39:1401–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang XZ, Pan J, Zhu J, Kunkel KE, Wang JXL, Dai A (2006) Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change. J Geophys Res Atmos 111:D10108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Alexander M (2007) Atmospheric bridge, oceanic tunnel, and global climatic teleconnections. Rev Geophys 45:RG2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wu G (2004) Progress in the study on the formation of the summertime subtropical anticyclone. Adv Atmos Sci 21:322–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wu G, Ren R (2004) Relation between the subtropical anticyclone and diabetic heating. J Clim 17:682–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuel J (2008) Drought in the southeast: lessons for water management. Environ Health Perspect 116:A168–A171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez CJ, Baigorria GA, Jones JW (2009) Use of climate indices to predict corn yields in southeast USA. Int J Climatol 29:1680–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Palecki MA, Betancourt JL (2004) Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influence on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:4136–4141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhaden MJ, Zebiak SE, Glantz MH (2006) ENSO as an integrating concept in Earth science. Science 314:1740–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO, Giorgi F, McDaniel L, Shields C (2003) Climate scenarios for the southeastern U.S. based on GCM and regional model simulations. Clim Change 60:7–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger F et al (2006) North American regional reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minobe S, Miyashita M, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Tokinaga H, Xie S-P (2010) Atmospheric response to the Gulf Stream: seasonal variations. J Clim 23:3699–3719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo KC, Schemm JE (2008) Relationship between ENSO and drought over the Southeastern United States. Geophys Res Lett 35:L15701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo KC, Schemm J-KE, Yoo S-H (2009) Influence of ENSO and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation on drought over the United States. J Clim 22:5962–5982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller B et al (2011) Evaluation of global observations-based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 38:L06402

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam S, Ruiz-Barradas A (2006) Seasonal hydroclimate variability over North America in global and regional reanalysis and AMIP simulations: varied representation. J Clim 19:815–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninomiya K, Kobayashi C (1999) Precipitation and moisture balance of the Asian summer monsoon in 1991 Part II: moisture transport and moisture balance. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 77:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Onogi K et al (2007) The JRA-25 reanalysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 85:369–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan B, Cook E, Lall U, Ray BK (2000) Spatiotemporal variability of ENSO and SST teleconnections to summer drought over the United States during the twentieth century. J Clim 13:4244–4255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee J, Im J, Carbone GJ, Jensen JR (2008) Delineation of climate regions using in situ and remotely-sensed data for the Carolinas. Remote Sens Environ 112:3099–3111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riha SJ, Wilks DS, Simoens P (1996) Impact of temperature and precipitation variability on crop model predictions. Clim Change 32:293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropelewski CF, Halpert MS (1987) Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 115:1606–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane AC (2010) NARR’S atmospheric water cycle components. Part II: summertime mean and diurnal interactions. J Hydrometeorol 11:1220–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the Southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J Clim 22:5021–5045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Naik N, Vecchi GA (2010) Thermodynamic and dynamic mechanisms for large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle in response to global warming. J Clim 23:4651–4668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JM, Grundstein A, Mote TL (2007) Quantifying the contribution of tropical cyclones to extreme rainfall along the coastal southeastern United States. Geophys Res Lett 34:L23810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skific N, Francis JA, Cassano JJ (2009) Attribution of seasonal and regional changes in Arctic moisture convergence. J Clim 22:5115–5134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Reynolds RW, Peterson TC, Lawrimore J (2008) Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J Clim 21:2283–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Barros AP (2012) The impact of forcing datasets on the high-resolution simulation of Tropical Storm Ivan (2004) in the Southern Appalachians. Mon Weather Rev 140:3300–3326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Guillemot CJ (1995) Evaluation of the global atmospheric moisture budget as seen from analyses. J Clim 8:2255–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uppala SM et al (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oldenborgh GJ, Burgers G (2005) Searching for decadal variations in ENSO precipitation teleconnections. Geophys Res Lett 32:L15701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Lee S-K, Enfield DB (2008) Climate response to anomalously large and small Atlantic warm pools during the summer. J Clim 21:2437–2450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Fu R, Kumar A, Li W (2010) Intensification of summer rainfall variability in the Southeastern United States during recent decades. J Hydrometeorol 11:1007–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver SJ, Ruiz-Barradas A, Nigam S (2009) Pentad evolution of the 1988 drought and 1993 flood over the great plains: an NARR perspective on the atmospheric and terrestrial water balance. J Clim 22:5366–5384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Liu Y (2003) Summertime quadruplet heating pattern in the subtropics and the associated atmospheric circulation. Geophy Res Lett 30:1201–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Liu Y, Zhu X, Li W, Ren R, Duan A, Liang X (2009) Multi-scale forcing and the formation of subtropical desert and monsoon. Ann Geophys Ger 27:3631–3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

ICOADS data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. We thank Drs. M. Susan Lozier, Yimin Liu and Jiangyu Mao, Mr. Kai Zhu, editor Dr. Schneider and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, and Mr. Kenneth Ells, Ian Stuart for editorial assistance. This work is supported by the NSF AGS 1147608. A. P. Barros is supported by NASA Grant NNX1010H66G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laifang Li.

Appendix: Spatial heterogeneity of SE U.S. summer precipitation

Appendix: Spatial heterogeneity of SE U.S. summer precipitation

To assess the heterogeneity of SE U.S. summer precipitation, cluster analysis is applied to the 60-year summer precipitation records at each SE U.S. grid point. The clustering algorithm used in this study is K-means clustering method (Kalkstein et al. 1987). The algorithm assigns the SE U.S. grid point into n clusters so that the variance within each cluster is minimized and the variance between each cluster is maximized.

The within cluster variance is calculated as the square distance between grid point precipitation to their corresponding cluster centroid:

$$ \frac{1}{M - 1}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M} {\left( {P_{i} - P_{c} } \right)^{2} } , $$
(7)

where M is the number of grid point in the cluster.

The between cluster variance is calculated as the square distance between cluster centroids and the domain average over the SE U.S.:

$$ \frac{1}{n - 1}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {P_{c\_i} - \left[ P \right]} \right)^{2} } , $$
(8)

Where n is the number of clusters identified over the SE U.S. domain; and \( \left[ P \right] \) is the areal-averaged summer precipitation over the SE U.S.

In the K-means algorithm, the determination of the number of clusters is subjective. In the analysis, we determine the number of clusters by tracing the within and between cluster variances, respectively, in response to the number of clusters assigned in K-means algorithm. The algorithm is repeated 30 times.

From our analysis, the within-cluster (between-cluster) variance rapidly decreases (increases) as the number of clusters increases; however, they saturate as the number of SE U.S. precipitation clusters increases to six. Thus, the six clusters are sufficient to generally reflect the spatial heterogeneity of SE U.S. summer precipitation. The six identified SE U.S. summer precipitation clusters are shown in Fig. 11.

Fig. 11
figure 11

SE U.S. summer precipitation clusters identified using K-means algorithm (“Appendix”)

From our analysis, the interannual variation of SE U.S. summer precipitation shows certain spatial heterogeneity (inter-cluster spread), in addition to the dominance of the large-scale domain-wide signal (EOF mode 1, Fig. 1). However, the two major features concerning the temporal variation of SE U.S. summer precipitation are in general agreement among clusters. First, the summer precipitation experiences increased variability during the recent 30 years among all six clusters. Averaged over the six clusters, the standard deviation of the summer precipitation variability increases by 0.15 mm day−2 in recent 30 years (Fig. 12), although the increase is relatively small in cluster 5 (northern Florida and the coastal regions of Georgia, Fig. 12). Second, moisture divergence largely explains the interannual variation of summer precipitation in each of the six clusters. Summer precipitation shows close linear relationship with the moisture divergence term (\( \nabla \cdot \overline{{\int_{0}^{{p_{s} }} {q\vec{V}dp} }} \)) (Fig. 13), and the correlation coefficient passes the \( \alpha = 0.01 \) significance level.

Fig. 12
figure 12

The standard deviation of summer precipitation within each cluster as shown in Fig. 11. The blue slashed bars represent the 1948–1977 period, and the red slashed bars represent the 1978–2007 period

Fig. 13
figure 13

The JJA mean moisture divergence anomaly (total) versus precipitation anomaly within each SE U.S. clusters (blue dots): af. The red solid lines are the best least squares fitting lines and the red dashed lines are the \( y = - x \) line

The cluster analysis suggests that interannual variation of summer precipitation over the six SE U.S. clusters shares similar characteristics in terms of the recent precipitation variability change and the dominant moisture budget processes. That is: (1) the summer precipitation variability has increased domain wide in recent 30 years (Fig. 12); (2) moisture transport is the predominant process for the interannual variation of SE U.S. summer precipitation (Fig. 13). See Figs. 11, 12 and 13.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Li, W. & Barros, A.P. Atmospheric moisture budget and its regulation of the summer precipitation variability over the Southeastern United States. Clim Dyn 41, 613–631 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1697-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1697-9

Keywords

Navigation