Abstract
This paper identifies two sources of uncertainties in model projections of temperature and precipitation: internal and inter-model variability. Eight models of WCRP-CMIP3 and WCRP-CMIP5 were compared to identify improvements in the reliability of projections from new generation models. While no significant differences are observed between both datasets, some improvements were found in the new generation models. For example, in summer CMIP5 inter-model variability of temperature was lower over northeastern Argentina, Paraguay and northern Brazil, in the last decades of the 21st century. Reliability of temperature projections from both sets of models is high, with signal to noise ratio greater than 1 over most of the study region. Although no major differences were observed in both precipitation datasets, CMIP5 inter-model variability was lower over northern and eastern Brazil in summer (especially at the end of the 21st century). Reliability of precipitation projections was low in both datasets. However, the signal to noise ratio in new generation models was close to 1, and even greater than 1 over eastern Argentina, Uruguay and southern Brazil in some seasons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WCRP:
-
World Climate Research Program
- CMIP:
-
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
- SRES:
-
Special Report on Emission Scenarios
- RCP:
-
Representative Concentrations Pathways
- SESA:
-
Southeastern South America
- ITCZ:
-
Intertropical Convergence Zone
- SACZ:
-
South Atlantic Convergence Zone
References
Arakawa A, Konor CS (1996) Vertical differencing of the primitive equations based on the Charney-Phillips grid in hybrid σ-p vertical coordinates. Mon Weather Rev 124:511–528
Arakawa A, Schubert WH (1974) Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment; Part I. J Atmospheric Sci 31:674–701. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:IOACCE>2.0.CO;2
Bidegain M, Camilloni I (2006) Performance of GCMs and climate future scenarios for southeastern South America. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on southern hemisphere meteorology and oceanography, 24–28 April, 2006, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil
Blázquez J, Nuñez MN, Kusunoki S (2012) Climate projections and uncertainties over South America from MRI/JMA global model experiments. Atmos Clim Sci (in press)
Cabré MF, Solman S, Nuñez MN (2010) Creating regional climate change scenarios over southern South America for the 2020’s and 2050’s using the pattern caling technique: validity and limitations. Clim Change 98:449–469. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9737-5
Carril AF, Menéndez CG, Nuñez MN (1997) Climate change scenarios over the South American region: an intercomparison of coupled general atmosphere-ocean circulation models. Int J Climatol 17:1613–1633. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199712)17:15<1613:AID-JOC209>3.0.CO;2-8
Cheng MD, Arakawa A (1997) Inclusion of rainwater budget and convective downdrafts in the Arakawa–Schubert cumulus parameterization. J Atmos Sci 54:1359–1378. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1359:IORBAC>2.0.CO;2
Chikira M, Sugiyama M (2009) A cumulus parameterization with state-dependent entrainment rate. Part I: description and sensitivity to temperature and humidity profiles. J Atmos Sci 67:2171–2193. doi:10.1175/2010JAS3316.1
Chylek P, Li J, Dubey MK, Wang M, Lesins G (2011) Observed and model simulated 20th century Arctic temperature variability: Canadian Earth System Model CanESM2. Atmos Chem Phys 11:22893–22907. doi:10.5194/acpd-11-22893-2011
Collins WJ, Bellouin N, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Gedney N, Hinton T, Jones CD, Liddicoat S, Martin G, O’Connor F, Rae J, Senior C, Totterdell I, Woodward S, Reichler T, Kim J (2009) Evaluation of HadGEM2 Model. Met Office, Exeter. Hadley Centre Technical Note 74
Cox P, Stephenson D (2007) A changing climate for prediction. Science 317:207–208. doi:10.1126/science.1145956
Flato GM (2005) The Third Generation Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3). Available online en http://www.cccma.bc.ec.gc.ca/models/cgcm3.shtml
Garreaud R, Falvey M (2008) The coastal winds off western subtropical South America in future climate scenarios. Int J Climatol 29:543–554. doi:10.1002/joc.1716
Giorgi F, Bi X (2009) Time of emergence (TOE) of GHG-forced precipitation change hot-spots. Geophys Res Lett 36:L06709. doi:10.1029/2009GL037593
Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000) Uncertainties in Regional Climate Change Prediction: a regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 coupled AOGCM. Clim Dyn 16:169–182. doi:10.1007/PL00013733
Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “reliability ensemble averaging” (REA) method. J Clim 15:1141–1158. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1141:COAURA>2.0.CO;2
Gordon HB, Rotstayn LD, McGregor JL, Dix MR, Kowalczyk EA, O’Farrell SP, Waterman LJ, Hirst AC, Wilson SG, Collier MA, Watterson IG, Elliott TI (2002) The CSIRO Mk3 climate system model. Aspendale: CSIRO atmospheric research, CSIRO Atmospheric Research technical paper; no. 60, 130 pp. (http://www.dar.csiro.au/publications/gordon_2002a.pdf)
Hasumi H, Emori S (eds) (2004) K-1 coupled model (MIROC) description, K-1 technical report, 1, Center for climate system research, University of Tokyo, 34 pp. Available at http://www.ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/kyosei/hasumi/MIROC/tech-repo.pdf
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1107. doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2ensamblede607.1
Hawkins E, Sutton RT (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37:407–418. doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6
Hosaka (2011) MRI New land surface model HAL. The Second Symposium on Polar Science “The Front Line of Ice Core Studies” Program. Disponible en: http://www.nipr.ac.jp/symposium2011/program/Pmg/P_HosakaMasahiro_P.pdf
Johns TC, Durman CF, Banks HT, Roberts MJ, McLaren AJ, Ridley JK, Senior CA, Williams KD, Jones A, Rickard GJ, Cusack S, Ingram WJ, Crucifix M, Sexton DMH, Joshi MM, Dong BW, Spencer H, Hill RSR, Gregory JM, Keen AB, Pardaens AK, Lowe JA, Bodas-Salcedo A, Stark S, Searl Y (2006) The new Hadley Centre climate model HadGEM1: evaluation of coupled simulations. J Clim 19:1327–1353
Kitoh A, Kusunoki S, Nakaegawa T (2011) Climate change projections over South America in the late 21st century with the 20 and 60 km mesh Meteorological Research Institute atmospheric general circulation model (MRI-AGCM). J Geophys Res 116:D06105. doi:10.1029/2010JD014920
Knutti R, Allen MR, Friedlingstein P, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Meehl GA, Meinshausen M, Murphy JM, Plattner GK, Raper SCB, Stocker TF, Stott PA, Teng H, Wigley TLM (2008) A review of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century. J Clim 21:2651–2663. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI2119.1
Labraga LC, Lopez M (1997) A comparison of the climate response to increased carbon dioxide simulated by general circulation models with mixed-layer and dynamic ocean representations in the region of South America. Int J Climatol 17:1635–1650. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199712)17:15<1635:AID-JOC223>3.0.CO;2-G
Li J, Barker HW (2005) A radiation algorithm with correlated k-distribution. Part I: local thermal equilibrium. J Atmos Sci 62:286–309. doi:10.1175/JAS-3396.1
Marengo JA, Ambrizzi T, Rocha RP, Alves LM, Cuadra SV, Valverde MC, Ferraz SET, Torres RR, Santos DC (2009a) Future change of climate in South America in the late XXI century: intercomparison of scenarios from three regional climate models. Clim Dyn 33:1073–1097. doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0721-6
Marengo JA, Jones R, Alves LM, Valverde MC (2009b) Future change of temperature and precipitation extremes in South America as derived from the PRECIS regional climate modeling system. Int J Climatol 29:2241–2255. doi:10.1002/joc.1863
Marengo JA, Chou SC, Kay G, Alves LM, Pesquero JF, Soares WR, Santos DC, Lyra AA, Sueiro G, Betts R, Chagas DJ, Gomes JL, Bustamante JF, Tavares P (2011) Development of regional future climate change scenarios in South America using the Eta CPTEC/HadCM3 climate change projections: climatology and regional analyses for the Amazon, Sao Francisco and the Parana River basins. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1155-5
Marti O, Braconnot P, Bellier J, Benshila R, Bony S, Brockmann P, Cadule P, Caubel A, Denvil S, Dufresne JL, Fairhead L, Filiberti MA, Foujols MA, Fichefet T, Friedlingstein P, Gosse H, Grandpeix JY, Hourdin F, Krinner G, Lévy C, Madec G, Musat I, de Noblet N, Polcher J, Talandier C (2005) The new IPSL climate system model: IPSLCM4. Tech. rep., Institut Pierre Simon Laplace des Sciences de l’Environnement Global, IPSL, Case 101, 4 place Jussieu, Paris, France
Martin GM, Bellouin N, Collins WJ, Culverwell ID, Halloran PR, Hardiman SC, Hinton TJ, Jones CD, McDonald RE, McLaren AJ, O’Connor FM, Roberts MJ, Rodriguez JM, Woodward S, Best MJ, Brooks ME, Brown AR, Butchart N, Dearden C, Derbyshire SH, Dharssi I, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Edwards JM, Falloon PD, Gedney N, Gray LJ, Hewitt HT, Hobson M, Huddleston MR, Hughes J, Ineson S, Ingram WJ, James PM, Johns TC, Johnson CE, Jones A, Jones CP, Joshi MM, Keen AB, Liddicoat S, Lock AP, Maidens AV, Manners JC, Milton SF, Rae JGL, Ridley JK, Sellar A, Senior CA, Totterdell IJ, Verhoef A, Vidale PL, Wiltshire A (2011) The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model Climate configurations. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 4:765–841. doi:10.5194/gmdd-4-765-2011
Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(9):1383–1394. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383
Moss RH, Babiker M, Brinkman S, Calvo E, Carter T, Edmonds J, Elgizouli I, Emori S, Erda L, Hibbard K, Jones R, Kainuma M, Kelleher J, Lamarque JF, Manning M, Matthews B, Meehl J, Meyer L, Mitchell J, Nakicenovic N, O’Neill B, Pichs R, Riahi K, Rose S, Runci P, Stouffer R, van Vuuren D, Weyant J, Wilbanks T, van Ypersele JP, Zurek M (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823
Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772. doi:10.1038/nature02771
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Lebre La Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner HH, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nuñez MN, Solman SA, Cabré MF (2009) Regional climate change experiments over southern South America. II: climate change scenarios in the late twenty-first Century. Clim Dyn 32:1081–1095. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0449-8
Pan DM, Randall DA (1993) Implementation of the Arakawa-Schubert cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Meteorol Monogr 46:137–144
Pan DM, Randall DA (1998) A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:949–981. doi:10.1002/qj.49712454714
Randall D, Pan DM (1993) Implementation of the Arakawa-Schubert cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Meteorological monograph/the representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. J Atmos Sci 46:137–144. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0449-8
Rotstayn L, Collier M, Dix M, Feng Y, Gordon HO, Farrell S, Smith I, Syktus J (2010) Improved simulation of Australian climate and ENSO-related climate variability in a GCM with an interactive aerosol treatment. Int J Climatol 30:1067–1088. doi:10.1002/joc.1952
Soares W, Marengo J (2008) Assessments of moisture fluxes east of the Andes in South America in a global warming scenario. Int J Climatol 29:1395–1414. doi:10.1002/joc.1800
Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Takemura T, Nozawa T, Emori S, Nakajima TY, Nakajima T (2005) Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport-radiation model. J Geophys Res 110:D02202. doi:10.1029/2004JD005029
Takemura T, Egashira M, Matsuzawa K, Ichijo H, O’ishi R, Abe-Ouchi A (2009) A simulation of the global distribution and radiative forcing of soil dust aerosols at the Last Glacial Maximum. Atmos Chem Phys 9:3061–3073
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
Urrutia R, Vuille M (2009) Climate change projections for the tropical Andes using a regional climate model: temperature and precipitation simulations for the end of the 21st century. J Geophys Res 114:D02108. doi:10.1029/2008JD011021
Vera C, Silvestri G, Liebmann B, Gonzalez P (2006) Climate change scenarios for seasonal precipitation in South America from IPCC-AR4 models. Geophys Res Lett 33:L13707. doi:10.1029/2006GL025759
Vera C, Gonzalez PLM, Silvestri G (2009) About uncertainties in WCRP/CMIP3 climate simulations over South America. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on southern hemisphere meteorology and oceanography. 9–13 February, 2009, Melbourne, Australia
Volodin EM, Diansky NA (2004) El-Niño reproduction in coupled general circulation model of atmosphere and ocean. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 12:5–14
Volodin EM, Diansky NA, Gusev AV (2010) Simulating present day climate with the INMCM4.0 Coupled Model of the atmospheric and oceanic general circulations. Izvestiya Atmos Ocean Phys 46:414–431. doi:10.1134/S000143381004002X
von Salzen K, McFarlane N (2002) Parameterization of the bulk effects of lateral and cloud-top 10 entrainment in transient shallow cumulus clouds. J Atmos Sci 59:1405–1429. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1405:POTBEO>2.0.CO;2
Watanabe S, Miura H, Sekiguchi M, Nagashima T, Sudo K, Emori S, Kawamiya M (2008) Development of an atmospheric general circulation model for integrated Earth system modeling on the Earth simulator. J Earth Simul 9:28–35
Watanabe M, Emori S, Satoh M, Miura H (2009) A PDF-based hybrid prognostic cloud scheme for general circulation models. Clim Dyn 33:795–816. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0489-0
Watanabe M, Suzuki T, O’ishi R, Komuro Y, Watanabe S, Emori S, Takemura T, Chikira M, Ogura T, Sekiguchi M, Takata K, Yamazaki D, Yokohata T, Nozawa T, Hasumi H, Tatebe H, Kimoto M (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J Clim 23:6312–6335. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1
Watanabe S, Hajima T, Sudo K, Nagashima T, Takemura T, Okajima H, Nozawa T, Kawase H, Abe M, Yokohata T, Ise T, Sato H, Kato E, Takata K, Emori S, Kawamiya M (2011) MIROC-ESM: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3 m experiments. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 4:1063–1128. doi:10.5194/gmdd-4-1063-2011
Wilson DR, Ballard SP (1999) A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125:1607–1636. doi:10.1002/qj.49712555707
Yukimoto S, Noda A (2002) Improvements of the meteorological research institute global ocean-atmosphere coupled GCM (MRI-CGCM2) and its climate sensitivity. Technical report 10, NIES, Japan
Yukimoto S, Yoshimura H, Hosaka M, Sakami T, Tsujino H, Hirabara M, Tanaka TY, Deushi M, Obata A, Nakano H, Adachi Y, Shindo E, Yabu S, Ose T, Kitoh A (2011) Meteorological Research Institute-Earth System Model Version 1 (MRI-ESM1). Model description. Technical Reports of the Meteorological Research Institute, No. 64
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, in charge of CMIP, and the climate modelling groups (listed in Tables 1, 2 of this paper) for producing and making available their model outputs. For CMIP the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Edward Hawkins for his help with the methodology used in this paper and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped to improve this paper. This study was supported with grants from UBACYT-X160, PIP CONICET 112-200801-00195 and CLARIS-LPB (A Europe-South America Network for Climate Change Assessment and Impact Studies in La Plata Basin).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The new generation models (WCRP-CMIP5) present some differences regarding the previous generation (WCRP-CMIP3). Some of them are listed below:
-
CanESM2 model (Chylek et al. 2011): presents a new algorithm of radiation (k-correlated distribution, Li and Barker 2005): an improvement in the aerosol optical property parameterization, direct and indirect radiative effects in aerosols using a prognostic bulk aerosol scheme, a new shallow convection scheme (von Salzen and McFarlane 2002).
-
CSIRO-Mk3.6 model (Rotstayn et al. 2010): this version includes an interactive aerosol scheme (sulfate, dust, sea salt and carbonaceous aerosol); an updated in the radiation scheme; a modification in the boundaru-layer treatment (non-local scheme); some minor changes are introduced in convection and clouds schemes (including direct and indirect effects of aerosols and aerosols from volcanic eruptions).
-
INM-CM4 model (Volodin et al. 2010): the time step has reduced from 12 to 5 min; the horizontal resolution is increased; some physical parameterizations have slightly changed: radiation, shallow and deep convections, orographic and nonorographic gravity waves resistances and processes related to vegetation and soil. IPSL-CM5A-LR (http://icmc.ipsl.fr/images/internal/ipsl-esm-20100228-1.pdf): improved horizontal resolution, inclusion of the carbon cycle; connection between tropospheric chemistry and layer.
-
MIROC5 model (Watanabe et al. 2010): the vertical coordinate σ was changed to the hybrid σ-p (Arakawa and Konor 1996); the radiative scheme was updated (improvements in the line absorption and continuum absorption with an increase in the number of absorption bands from 18 to 29); the cumulus parameterization was changed (Chikira and Sugiyama 2009): it is an entraining-plume model, where the lateral entrainment rate varies vertically depending on the surrounding environment; in order to better represent cloud and cloud-radiative feedback, it was developed a prognostic LSC scheme (Watanabe et al. 2009) and a bulk microphysical scheme was implemented (Wilson and Ballard 1999); a aerosol module (SPRINTARS, Takemura et al. 2005, 2009) was coupled with the radiation and cloud microphysics schemes to calculate the direct and indirect effects of the aerosols.
-
MIROC5-ESM model (Watanabe et al. 2011): based on the global climate model MIROC includes an atmospheric chemistry component (CHASER), a nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton-detritus (NPZD) type 10 ocean ecosystem component, and a terrestrial ecosystem component dealing with dynamic vegetation (SEIB-DGVM). This model has the fully resolved stratosphere and mesosphere (Watanabe et al. 2008). The hybrid terrain-following (sigma) pressure vertical coordinate system is used, and there are 80 vertical layers between the surface and about 0.003 hPa. In order to obtain the spontaneously generated equatorial quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), a fine vertical resolution of about 680 m is used in the lower stratosphere. Some parameterizations were modified, especially those who are crucial for the representation of the large-scale dynamical and thermal structures in the stratosphere and mesosphere.
-
MRI-CGCM3 model (Yukimoto et al. 2011): some settings were changed. For example, in the cumulus scheme (Arakawa and Schubert 1974) a prognostic mass flux method is used to express the condition of away from quasi-equilibrium (Randall and Pan 1993; Pan and Randall 1993, 1998). The cumulus downdraft is also considered (Cheng and Arakawa 1997). A mid-level convection scheme is included to express the mid-latitude convection accompanying the front and synoptic-scale disturbances. In the radiative scheme, the short and long wave radiation are treated separately. The long-wave (short-wave) region of the spectrum is divided into 9 (22) bands. The radiative flux is calculated in each band. In the cloud scheme, the model can recognize the spatial and temporal distribution of aerosols due to coupling between the aerosol model and the chemistry. It was implemented a new soil model (HAL; Hosaka 2011).
-
HadGEM2-ES model (Martin et al. 2011, Collins et al. 2009): it was implemented an adaptive detrainment parameterization in the convection scheme, which improves the simulation of tropical convection and leads to a much reduced (and more realistic) wind stress over the tropical Pacific, and a package of changes including an alteration to the treatment of excess water from super-saturated soil surfaces and improved representation of the lifetime of convective cloud. Several changes and additions to the representation of aerosol have been carried out. Improvements include changes to existing aerosol species, such as sulphate and biomass-burning aerosols, and representation of additional species, such as mineral dust, fossil-fuel organic carbon, and secondary organic aerosol from biogenic terpene emissions. New Earth System components include the terrestrial and oceanic ecosystems and tropospheric chemistry. The ecosystem components are introduced principally to allow simulation of the carbon cycle and its interactions with climate.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blázquez, J., Nuñez, M.N. Analysis of uncertainties in future climate projections for South America: comparison of WCRP-CMIP3 and WCRP-CMIP5 models. Clim Dyn 41, 1039–1056 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1489-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1489-7