Abstract
We investigate the properties of the function sending each N-tuple of points to minus the logarithm of the product of their mutual distances. We prove that, as a function defined on the product of N spheres, this function is subharmonic, and indeed its (Riemannian) Laplacian is constant. We also prove a mean value equality and an upper bound on the derivative of the function. We use these results to get sharp upper bounds for the precision needed to describe an approximation to elliptic Fekete points (in the sense demanded by Smale’s 7th problem). We also conclude that Smale’s 7th problem has solutions given by rational spherical points of bounded (small) bit length, proving that there exists an exponential running time algorithm which solves it on the Turing machine model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Smale refers to the unit sphere in ℝ3, but the two problems are equivalent by sending points \((a,b,c)\in \mathbb{S}\) to (2a,2b,2c−1).
More precisely, the running time of our procedure is polynomial(N)⋅(20N)36N.
As a linear operator in \(C^{2}(\mathcal{M})\), Δ is called the Laplace–Beltrami operator. Note that for some authors \(\Delta {f}=-\operatorname{div}(\operatorname{grad}(f))\) and hence has a minus sign, see for example [14, p. 88].
References
Armentano, D., Beltrán, C., Shub, M.: Minimizing the discrete logarithmic energy on the sphere: the role of random polynomials. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 363(6), 2955–2965 (2011)
Bendito, E., Carmona, A., Encinas, A.M., Gesto, J.M., Gómez, A., Mouriño, C., Sánchez, M.T.: Computational cost of the Fekete problem. I. The forces method on the 2-sphere. J. Comput. Phys. 228(9), 3288–3306 (2009)
Bendito, E., Carmona, A., Encinas, A.M., Gesto, J.M.: Computational cost of the Fekete Problem II: on Smale’s 7th problem. To appear. Available at http://www-ma3.upc.es/users/bencar/papers.html
Bergersen, B., Boal, D., Palffy-Muhoray, P.: Equilibrium configurations of particles on a sphere: the case of logarithmic interactions. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 27, 2579–2586 (1994)
Besse, A.L.: Manifolds all of Whose Geodesics are Closed. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas], vol. 93. Springer, Berlin (1978). With appendices by D.B.A. Epstein, J.-P. Bourguignon, L. Bérard-Bergery, M. Berger and J.L. Kazdan
Blum, L., Cucker, F., Shub, M., Smale, S.: Complexity and Real Computation. Springer, New York (1998)
Blum, L., Shub, M., Smale, S.: On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: NP-completeness, recursive functions and universal machines. Bull., New Ser., Am. Math. Soc. 21(1), 1–46 (1989)
do Carmo, M.P.: Riemannian Geometry. Mathematics: Theory & Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston (1992). Translated from the second Portuguese edition by Francis Flaherty
Dragnev, P.D.: On the separation of logarithmic points on the sphere. In: Approximation Theory, X, St. Louis, MO, 2001. Innov. Appl. Math., pp. 137–144. Vanderbilt Univ. Press, Nashville (2002)
Dubickas, A.: On the maximal product of distances between points on a sphere. Liet. Mat. Rink. 36(3), 303–312 (1996)
Evans, L.C.: Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998)
Forrester, P.J.: Log-Gases and Random Matrices. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)
Jost, J.: Postmodern Analysis, 3rd edn. Universitext. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Jost, J.: Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis, 5th edn. Universitext. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Kuijlaars, A.B.J., Saff, E.B.: Asymptotics for minimal discrete energy on the sphere. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350, 523–538 (1998)
Rakhmanov, E.A., Saff, E.B., Zhou, Y.M.: Minimal discrete energy on the sphere. Math. Res. Lett. 1, 647–662 (1994)
Rakhmanov, E.A., Saff, E.B., Zhou, Y.M.: Electrons on the sphere. In: Computational Methods and Function Theory, Penang, 1994. Ser. Approx. Decompos., vol. 5, pp. 293–309. World Scientific, River Edge (1995)
Schmutz, E.: Rational points on the unit sphere. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 6(3), 482–487 (2008)
Shub, M., Smale, S.: Complexity of Bezout’s theorem. III. Condition number and packing. J. Complex. 9(1), 4–14 (1993). Festschrift for Joseph F. Traub, Part I
Smale, S.: Mathematical problems for the next century. Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives, pp. 271–294. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2000)
Whyte, L.L.: Unique arrangements of points on a sphere. Am. Math. Mon. 59, 606–611 (1952)
Willmore, T.J.: Mean value theorems in harmonic Riemannian spaces. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 25, 54–57 (1950)
Zhong, Q.: Energies of zeros of random sections on Riemann surfaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57(4), 1753–1780 (2008)
Zhou, Y.: Arrangements of points on the sphere. Ph.D. Thesis. Math. Department, University of South Florida (1995)
Hartman, P.: Ordinary Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1964)
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Cecilia Pola for many conversations, and to Jean Pierre Dedieu, Luis Miguel Pardo, Mike Shub, and two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions. Thanks also to Joaquim Ortega Cerdà for his comments on harmonic manifolds.
Partially supported by MTM2010-16051 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation MICINN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Edward B. Saff.
Appendix: Topics from Riemannian Geometry and Harmonic Analysis in Manifolds
Appendix: Topics from Riemannian Geometry and Harmonic Analysis in Manifolds
To facilitate the reading of this manuscript, we include two short sections with some results from Riemannian geometry and harmonic analysis that have been used in the paper. The contents of this appendix are mainly taken from [8, 14].
1.1 A.1 Riemannian Geometry
By a “Riemannian manifold” \(\mathcal{M}\), we mean here a smooth (C ∞) differentiable manifold with a smooth Riemannian structure, that is, a smooth section \(\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle:T\mathcal{M}\times T\mathcal{M}\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathbb{R}\), where \(T\mathcal{M}\) is the tangent bundle of \(\mathcal{M}\) and for each \(p\in \mathcal{M}\), \(\langle \cdot,\cdot\rangle_{p}:T_{p}\mathcal{M}\times T_{p}\mathcal{M}\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathbb{R}\) is a definite positive, symmetric bilinear map. We denote by n the dimension of \(\mathcal{M}\). Associated with 〈⋅,⋅〉 p , we consider the norm \(\|v\|_{p}=\langle v,v\rangle_{p}^{1/2}\) for \(v\in T_{p}\mathcal{M}\). We denote by C 2(U) the set of C 2 functions defined in some open set \(U\subseteq \mathcal{M}\).
Given a collection \(\mathcal{M}^{(1)},\ldots,\mathcal{M}^{(r)}\) of Riemannian manifolds, we can define in \(\mathcal{M}=\mathcal{M}^{(1)}\times\cdots\times \mathcal{M}^{(r)}\) a product Riemannian structure as follows: Let \(p=(p^{(1)},\ldots,p^{(r)})\in \mathcal{M}\), and let \(v^{(i)},w^{(i)}\in T_{p^{(i)}}\mathcal{M}^{(i)}\), 1≤i≤r, be a collection of tangent vectors. Then define
The length of a piecewise C 1 curve \(\gamma:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathcal{M}\) with tangent vector \(\dot{\gamma}\) (i.e., \(\dot{\gamma}(t)\in T_{\gamma (t)}\mathcal{M},t\in[a,b]\)) is defined as
The distance between two points \(p,q\in \mathcal{M}\) is then defined as the infimum of the lengths of piecewise C 1 curves with extremes p,q. This gives \(\mathcal{M}\) a structure of metric space and allows us to define open and closed balls as usual.
Given a coordinate chart \(\phi:U\subseteq \mathcal{M}\,{\rightarrow}\, V\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}\), the Riemannian product is represented by a positive definite, symmetric matrix
such that given \(v,w\in T_{p} \mathcal{M}\) with p∈U, v=(v 1,…,v n ) and w=(w 1,…,w n ) in coordinates, we have
where w T is the transpose of w. A function f:U → ℝ is called (Lebesgue-)measurable or integrable if f(ϕ −1(x))|det(DG(x))|1/2 is (Lebesgue-)measurable or integrable as a function of x∈V. In that case, the integral of f in U is defined as
Given \(f:\mathcal{M}\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathbb{R}\), we define
where {ρ α } is a partition of the unity subordinate to some open cover of \(\mathcal{M}\) by coordinate charts {(U α ,ϕ α )} (f is called measurable or integrable if it is so in each U α ). The volume of some measurable subset \(U\subseteq \mathcal{M}\) is
If \(\operatorname {Vol}{(U)}<\infty\), we define the expected value of f:U → ℝ in U as
We denote by g ij the components of the inverse matrix G(x)−1. The Chirstoffel symbols associated with ϕ are then
A smooth curve \(\gamma:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathcal{M}\) is a geodesic if it is a critical point of the energy functional \(\int_{a}^{b}\|\dot{\gamma}\|^{2}\,dt\). In coordinates, denoting x(t)=(x 1(t),…,x n (t))=ϕ(γ(t)), for i∈{1,…n},
Given \(p\in \mathcal{M}\) and \(v\in T_{p}\mathcal{M}\), there exists ε>0 and a unique geodesic \(\gamma:[0,\varepsilon]\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathcal{M}\) such that γ(0)=p and \(\dot{\gamma}(0)=v\). From the geodesic equation above, we can easily see that if \(\mathcal{M}^{(1)}\times\cdots\times \mathcal{M}^{(r)}\) has the product structure, then a curve \(\gamma=(\gamma^{(1)},\ldots,\gamma ^{(r)}):[a,b]\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathcal{M}\) is a geodesic in \(\mathcal{M}\) if and only if \(\gamma ^{(i)}:[a,b]\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathcal{M}^{(i)}\) is a geodesic in \(\mathcal{M}^{(i)}\) for i∈{1,…,r}. If \(\mathcal{M}\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{k}\) is a smooth submanifold of ℝk with the Riemannian structure inherited from ℝk (that is, 〈v,w〉 p =〈v,w〉 the usual inner product in ℝk), the geodesic equation reads
We are most interested in the cases \(\mathcal{M}=\mathbb{S}\) with the Riemannian structure inherited from ℝ3 and \(\mathcal{M}=\mathbb{S}^{N}=\mathbb{S}\times\cdots \times \mathbb{S}\) (N times) with the product Riemannian structure. Of course, this product structure is also the Riemannian structure of \(\mathbb{S}^{N}\) as a submanifold of ℝ3N. Note that \(\mathbb{S}\) has dimension 2 and \(\mathbb{S}^{N}\) has dimension 2N. Geodesics in \(\mathbb{S}\) are great circles parametrized with constant speed. More exactly, the geodesic γ(t) such that \(\gamma(0)=p\in \mathbb{S}\) and \(\dot{\gamma}(0)=v\in T_{p}\mathbb{S}\), where ∥v∥=1, is given by
Indeed, the reader may check that \(\gamma(0)=p,\dot{\gamma}(0)=v,\dot{\gamma}(t)\perp T_{\gamma(t)}\mathbb{S},\|\dot{\gamma}(t)\|=1\) for all t.
1.2 A.2 Harmonic Analysis in Manifolds
The Hessian of a function f∈C 2(U) is a bilinear form defined as
where ∇ is the Levi-Civita connection and X,Y are vector fields such that X(p)=v, Y(p)=w. In coordinates,
If γ(t) is the unique geodesic such that γ(0)=p and \(\dot{\gamma}(0)=v\), then
The LaplacianFootnote 3 \(\Delta {f}=\operatorname {div}(\operatorname{grad}(\mathcal{E}))\) of f is the trace of \(\operatorname{Hess}({f})\) as a bilinear operator, that is, the trace of (h ij ), or in coordinates,
A function f∈C 2(U), \(U\subseteq \mathcal{M}\) open, is called harmonic (subharmonic) if Δf=0 (Δf≥0). Note that Δ is a uniformly elliptic operator and satisfies the hypotheses of [13, Sect. 24]. Thus, the classical strong maximum principle applies. Namely:
Theorem 6.1
(Strong maximum principle)
Let f∈C 2(U) be a nonconstant subharmonic function. Then for any open set Ω⊆U such that \(\overline{\varOmega }\subseteq U\), we have
In particular, the supremum is reached only in the boundary of Ω.
The trace of (h ij ) is equal to the trace of Q ∗(h ij )Q for any orthogonal matrix Q. Hence, we also have
The classical mean value theorem for harmonic functions in ℝn (see for example [11, Sect. 2.2]) claims that, if f:U⊆ℝn → ℝ is harmonic (U an open set), then \(f(x)= \mathchoice {{\setbox0=\hbox{$\displaystyle{\textstyle-}{\int}$}\vcenter{\hbox{$\textstyle-$}}\kern-.5\wd0}}{{\setbox0=\hbox{$\textstyle{\scriptstyle-}{\int}$}\vcenter{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$}}\kern-.5\wd0}}{{\setbox0=\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\scriptscriptstyle-}{\int}$}\vcenter{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$}}\kern-.5\wd0}}{{\setbox0=\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle{\scriptscriptstyle-}{\int}$}\vcenter{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$}}\kern-.5\wd0}}\!\int _{B(x,\varepsilon)}f(y)\,dy\) for each ball B(x,ε)⊆U. Unfortunately, no similar equality is valid in general for harmonic functions on Riemannian manifolds, but there is a class of manifolds for which it holds. These are called locally harmonic manifolds, and the corresponding mean value equality was first proved by Willmore [22] (see also [5, Chap. 6]). Following the proof of [5, Prop. 6.21], if \(\mathcal{M}\) is a locally harmonic manifold and \(f:\mathcal{M}\,{\rightarrow}\,\mathbb{R}\) is such that Δf=C is constant, then for small enough t>0, we have
The sphere \(\mathbb{S}\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{3}\) is locally harmonic, and moreover, (A.2) can be stated for every t>0 such that f is defined in B(x,t). Thus, the classical mean value theorem is valid in the case of \(\mathbb{S}=\mathcal{M}\):
Theorem 6.2
Let f:U → ℝ (\(U\subseteq \mathbb{S}\) an open set) be such that Δf=C. Let p∈U. Then, for every ε>0 such that B p (ε)⊆U, we have
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beltrán, C. Harmonic Properties of the Logarithmic Potential and the Computability of Elliptic Fekete Points. Constr Approx 37, 135–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-012-9158-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-012-9158-y
Keywords
- Elliptic Fekete points
- Subharmonic function
- Logarithmic energy
- Smale’s 7th problem
- Harmonic manifold
- Simply exponential algorithm