Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian inference in measurement error models from objective priors for the bivariate normal distribution

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In regression analysis, when the covariates are not exactly observed, measurement error models extend the usual regression models toward a more realistic representation of the covariates. It is common in the literature to directly propose prior distributions for the parameters in normal measurement error models. Posterior inference requires Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) computations. However, the regression model can be seen as a reparameterization of the bivariate normal distribution. In this paper, general results for objective Bayesian inference under the bivariate normal distribution were adapted to the regression framework. So, posterior inferences for the structural parameters of a measurement error model under a great variety of priors were obtained in a simple way. The methodology is illustrated by using five common prior distributions showing good performance for all prior distributions considered. MCMC methods are not necessary at all. Model assessment is also discussed. Results from a simulation study and applications to real data sets are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger JO, Sun D (2008) Objective priors for the bivariate normal model. Ann Stat 36:963–982

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bolfarine H, Cordani LK (1993) Estimation of a structural linear regression model with a known reliability ratio. Ann Inst Stat Math 45:531–540

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buonaccorsi JP (2010) Measurement error: models, methods, and applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM (2006) Measurement error in nonlinear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-H, Shao QM, Ibrahim JG (2000) Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-L, Riu J (2006) On estimating linear relationships when both variables are subject to heteroscedastic measurement errors. Technometrics 48:511–519

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-L, Van Ness JW (1999) Statistical regression with measurement error. Arnold, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro M, Bolfarine H, Galea M (2013) Bayesian inference in measurement error models for replicated data. Environmetrics 24:22–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K-T, Li R (1999) Bayesian statistical inference on elliptical matrix distributions. J Multivar Anal 70:66–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller WA (1987) Measurement error models. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gamerman D, Lopes HF (2006) Markov chain Monte Carlo: stochastic simulation for bayesian inference, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs FE (1983) Grubbs’s estimator. In: Kotz S (ed) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol 3. Wiley, New York, pp 542–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson P (2004) Measurement error and misclassification in statistics and epidemiology. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson VE (2007) Bayesian model assessment using pivotal quantities. Bayesian Anal 2:719–734

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lachos VH, Cancho VG, Aoki R (2010) Bayesian analysis of skew-\(t\) multivariate null intercept measurement error model. Stat Papers 51:531–545

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X-L (1994) Posterior predictive \(p\)-values. Ann Stat 22:1142–1160

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson S, Gilks WR (1993) A Bayesian approach to measurement error problems in epidemiology using conditional independence models. Am J Epidemiol 138:430–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal I, Iglesias P (2008) Comparison between a measurement error model and a linear model without measurement error. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:92–102

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (2004). Some Bayesian methods in the estimation of parameters in the measurement error models and crossover trial. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati

  • Wang G, Sivaganesan S (2013) Objective priors for parameters in a normal linear regression with measurement error. Commun Stat Theory Methods 42:2694–2713

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and three referees for their valuable comments, which led to an improved version of the paper. This work was partially supported by Proyecto FONDECYT-1130375, Chile. The first author also acknowledges support from CNPq, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Vidal.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Sampling under the right-Haar prior

For the right-Haar prior in Section 3, samples from the posterior distribution of the parameters in (3) are drawn by cycling the steps 1–6 below:

  1. (1)

    Draw independent \(Z_1, Z_2, Z_3 \sim N(0,1)\), \(C_1 \sim \chi ^2_{n-1}\) and \(C_2 \sim \chi ^2_{n-2}\),

  2. (2)

    Compute \(\sigma _1 = (s_{11} / C_1)^{1/2}\),

  3. (3)

    Compute

    $$\begin{aligned} \sigma _2 = \big [s_{22} (1 - r^2)\big ]^{1/2} \left[ \frac{1}{C_2} + \frac{1}{C_1} \bigg ( \frac{Z_3}{C_2^{1/2}} - \frac{r}{(1-r^2)^{1/2}} \bigg )^2\right] ^{1/2}, \end{aligned}$$
  4. (4)

    Compute \(\rho = \psi (W)\) and

    $$\begin{aligned} W = -\frac{Z_3}{C_1^{1/2}} + \frac{C_2^{1/2}}{C_1^{1/2}} \frac{r}{\big (1-r^2\big )^{1/2}}, \quad \text {where} \ \psi (v) = \frac{v}{\big (1+v^2\big )^{1/2}}, \end{aligned}$$
  5. (5)

    Compute \(\mu _1 = \bar{x} + Z_1 s_{11}^{1/2} / (n C_1)^{1/2}\) and

  6. (6)

    Compute

    $$\begin{aligned} \mu _2 = \bar{y} + \frac{Z_1 r s_{22}^{1/2}}{(n C_1)^{1/2}} + \bigg ( \frac{Z_2 }{C_2^{1/2}} - \frac{Z_1 Z_3}{(C_1 C_2)^{1/2}} \bigg ) \bigg (\frac{s_{22} \big (1-r^2\big )}{n} \bigg )^{1/2}. \end{aligned}$$

Appendix 2: Tables

In this appendix, we present tables summarizing some results from our simulation study. ‘Median’, ‘Length’ and ‘CP’ stand for the average of the posterior medians, the average of the length of the 95% HPD intervals and the coverage probability of the 95% HPD intervals, respectively (Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8).

Table 3 Case 1
Table 4 Case 2
Table 5 Case 3
Table 6 Case 4
Table 7 Case 5
Table 8 Case 6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Castro, M., Vidal, I. Bayesian inference in measurement error models from objective priors for the bivariate normal distribution. Stat Papers 60, 1059–1078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0863-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0863-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation