Abstract
This paper extends an optimal frequency domain test for the detection of synchronous patterns in multiple time series to the case of fuzzy patterns, which are not confined to single frequencies or narrow frequency bands. Applying this extension to corn futures with different delivery dates, we obtain significant results only for the spreads between the different contracts but not for the original contracts, which is an indication that spread trading has the advantage of increased predictability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abken PA (1989) An analysis of intra-market spreads in heating oil futures. J Futur Mark 9:77–86
Dunis CL, Laws J, Evans B (2008) Trading futures spread portfolios: applications of higher order and recurrent networks. Eur J Finance 14:503–521
Girma PB, Paulson AS (1998) Seasonality in petroleum futures spreads. J Futur Mark 18:581–598
Geweke J, Porter-Hudak S (1983) The estimation and application of long memory time series models. J Time Ser Anal 4:221–238
Granger CWJ, Joyeux R (1980) An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. J Time Ser Anal 1:15–29
Hassler U, Scheithauer J (2011) Detecting changes from short to long memory. Stat Pap 52:847–870
Hirschfeld D (1983) A fundamental overview of the energy futures market. J Futur Mark 3:75–100
Hosking JRM (1981) Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68:165–176
Meisel DV, Byrne RA, Kuba M, Mather J, Ploberger W, Reschenhofer E (2006) Contrasting activity patterns of two related octopus species, Octopus macropus and Octopus vulgaris. J Comp Psychol 120:191–197
Nouira L, Boutahar M, Marimoutou V (2009) The effect of tapering on the semiparametric estimators for nonstationary long memory processes. Stat Pap 50:225–248
Ploberger W, Reschenhofer E (2010) Testing for cycles in multiple time series. J Time Ser Anal 31:427–434
Sibbertsen P, Willert J (2012) Testing for a break in persistence under long-range dependencies and mean shifts. Stat Pap 53:357–370
Siegel DR, Siegel DF (1990) Futures markets. The Dryden Press, Chicago
Teweles RJ, Jones FJ (1987) The futures game: who wins? Who loses? Why?, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors very much appreciate the referees’ comments, which substantially improved this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Under the additional assumption of normality, the statistics \(\hat{a}_h (j)\), \(\hat{b}_h (j)\), h=1,...,H, j=1,...,k are i.i.d. \(N(0,\underline{\sigma }^2)\) and the statistics
are i.i.d. \(\chi ^{2}\)-variables with 2 degrees of freedom, hence
Theorem The test statistic \(T=\sum _{h=1}^H {R_h }\) has the same limiting distribution as the simpler statistic \(T^*=\sum _{h=1}^H {R_h^*}\) , i.e.,
Proof Using (14), we see that \(R_{h}\) can be written as
where \(X_2 (h)\) and \(X_{2k} (h)\) are \(\sigma ^{2}\)-variables with 2 and 2\(k\) degrees of freedom, respectively. We have
because
Thus,
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reschenhofer, E., Ploberger, W. & Lehecka, G.V. Detecting fuzzy periodic patterns in futures spreads. Stat Papers 55, 487–496 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-012-0493-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-012-0493-7